Applied Mathematics and Mechanics

, Volume 6, Issue 6, pp 569–578 | Cite as

Selection of the optimum parameters for sandwich construction with honeycomb core

  • Zhou Zhu-lin


The minimum weight of sandwich construction which is regarded as objective function has been discussed. Under given constraint condition of the strength or the stiffness, the four optimum parameters of sandwich construction with honeycomb core (thickness of the face tf, thickness of the honeycomb core hc, thickness of the honeycomb wall ts, side length of the honeycomb cell c) are evaluated. By using constraint condition of the strength, a equation of high degree is finally solved. In the constraint condition of the stiffness, the constraint optimization problem is treated as inconstraint optimization problem with the method of obtaining extreme value solution by undetermined parameter multiplication. Also, the results are discussed.


Mathematical Modeling Objective Function Optimum Parameter Industrial Mathematic Side Length 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. [1]
    Zhou Zhu-lin, Manufacture, properties and design of GRP sandwich construction with honeycomb core,Glassfiber Reinforced Plastic 4 (1980), 26–37. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    Nanking University,Optimization Method (1978). (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    Shanghai GRP Research Institute,Design of GRP Construction (1980). (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  4. [4]
    Shanghai GRP Research Institute, Basic properties of GRP sandwich construction with honeycomb core,Glassfiber Reinforced Plastic,2 (1975), 13–54. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    Zhou Zhu-lin, Ultimate strongth of sandwich panels with honeycomb core,Acta Mechanica Sinica,1 (1983), 62–69. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  6. [6]
    Zhou Zhu-lin, Ultimate strongth of GRP sandwich column with honeycomb core in compression (1979). (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    Institute of Mechanics Academia Sinica,Bend, Stability and Vibration of Sandwich Plate and Shell (1978). (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  8. [8]
    AD 709656. Weight optimization of structural sandwich panels (1970).Google Scholar
  9. [9]
    AD 715989, Minimum weight structural sandwich (1970).Google Scholar
  10. [10]
    Alspaugh, D. W. and S. N. Huang, Minimum weight design of axisymmetric sandwich plates,AIAA J. 14, 12 (1976).Google Scholar
  11. [11]
    Huang, S. N. and D. W. Alspaugh, Minimum weight sandwich beam design,AIAA J.,12 (1974).Google Scholar
  12. [12]
    Stehlin, P. and L. Holsteinson, Minimum weight design of orthotropic sandwich panels loaded in compression and shear,FFA Report 122.Google Scholar
  13. [13]
    Arcksadrov, A. E., M. P. Nawumovar Optimum parameters for sandwich plate and shell with honoycomb core in compression,Calculation of Aviation Structural Element,4, (1965). (in Russian)Google Scholar
  14. [14]
    Turvey G. J., Uniformly loaded simply supported, antisymmetrically laminated, cross and angle-ply strips on a winkler/pasternak foundation,Aeronautical Journal (1976), 222–226.Google Scholar
  15. [15]
    Turvey, G. J., Buckling of simply supported laminated plates on elastic foundations,Aeronautical Journal (1976), 530–535.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Shanghai University of Technology (SUT), Shanghai, China 1985

Authors and Affiliations

  • Zhou Zhu-lin
    • 1
  1. 1.Shanghai GRP Research InstituteShanghai

Personalised recommendations