Advertisement

Child and Adolescent Social Work Journal

, Volume 12, Issue 1, pp 33–50 | Cite as

Evaluation of the Late Nite Basketball Project

  • David Derezotes
Articles

Abstract

The author's research team evaluated the Late Nite Basketball Project, an innovative recreational gang diversion program. Data were collected from in-depth interviews of over 100 gang members, family members, and staff and then analyzed using qualitative methodology. Reported benefits included: fun, jobs and scholarships, skill-building workshops, reduction of inter-gang violence, and formation of new relationships. Key recommendations included: institutionalization; expansion of services to younger children, girls, and non-athletes; linkage to suburban leagues; establishment of peer-counseling; increased parental involvement; improved selection, training, and ongoing support for staff; and improved integration with other programs.

Keywords

Family Member Young Child Research Team Social Psychology Parental Involvement 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Armstrong, S. (May 17, 1990). L.A. Fights Gangs with Basketballs. The Christian Science Monitor 6.Google Scholar
  2. Bry, B. H. (1989). The multiple risk factors hypothesis: An integrating concept of the etiology of drug abuse. InDrug and Alcohol Use Issues and Factors, Stanley Einstein (Ed.). Plenum Press, New York and London, pp. 37–43.Google Scholar
  3. Bryant, D. (September 1989). Communitywide responses crucial for dealing with youth gangs. Juvenile Justice Bulletin. p 1–6.Google Scholar
  4. Cadoret, R., O'Gorman, T., Troughton, E., & Heywood, E. (1985). Alcoholism and antisocial personality: Interrelationships, genetic, and environmental factors.Archives of General Psychiatry, 42, 161–167.Google Scholar
  5. Carnegie Council on Adolescent Development. (1989).Turning points: Preparing American yough for the 21st century. New York, NY: Carnegie Corporation.Google Scholar
  6. Cloninger, R., Bohnam, M., & Sigvardsson, S., (1981). Inheritance of Alcoholic Abuse: Interrelationships, genetic, and environmental factors.Archives of General Psychiatry, 38, 861–868.Google Scholar
  7. Fagen, J. (1989). The social organization of drug use and drug dealing among urban gangs.Criminology, 27(4): 633–667.Google Scholar
  8. Fox, J. R. (1989). Mission impossible? Social work practice with Black urban youth gangs.Social Work, 30:25–31.Google Scholar
  9. Goldstein, A. & Huff, R. C. (1993). The Gang Intervention Handbook. Champaign Ill: Research Press.Google Scholar
  10. Gottfredson, D.C. (1986). An empirical test of school-based environmental and individual interventions to reduce the risk of delinquent behavior.Criminology, 24(4), 705–730.Google Scholar
  11. Hagedorn, J. (November 1991). Gangs, Neighborhoods and Public Policy. Social Problems 38(4), 529–541.Google Scholar
  12. Hawkins, J. D., & Weis, J. G. (1986). The social development model: An integrated approach to delinquency prevention.Journal of Primary Prevention, 6(2), Winter, 73–97.Google Scholar
  13. Hochhaus, C. & Sousa, F. (1987). Why Children Belong to Gangs: A comparison of Expectations and Reality. The High School Journal 71(2) 74–77.Google Scholar
  14. Huff, R. C. (1990).Gangs in America. Newbury Park: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  15. Jankowski, M. S. (1991).Islands in the street: Gangs and American urban society. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  16. Kirby, D. & Waszack, C. (1989).An assessment of state policies affecting adolescent pregnancy and parenting. Washington, DC: Center for Population Options.Google Scholar
  17. Knox, G. (1991). An Introduction to Gangs. Berin Springs, MI: Vande Vere Publications.Google Scholar
  18. Lingwall, J. (1990). Gangs in Des Moines: Getting them to SCAT.Public Management, 72(10):15–16.Google Scholar
  19. Lovell, R. & Pope, C. (1993). Recreational Interventions. In A. Goldstein & R.C. Huff (Eds.),The gang intervention handbook (pp. 319–333). Champaign, Ill. Research Press.Google Scholar
  20. Marin, G. (1993). Defining culturally appropriate community interventions: Hispanics in a case study.Journal of Community Psychology, 21, 149–159.Google Scholar
  21. McIvor, G. (1991). Social work intervention in community service.British Journal of Social Work, 21, 591–609.Google Scholar
  22. Meier, R. F. (1988). Discovering delinquency.Sociological inquiry, 58(3): 231–249.Google Scholar
  23. Philiber, S., Allen, J., Hoggson, N., & McNeil, W. (1988).A three-year evaluation of a program to prevent teen pregnancy and school dropout. New York, NY: Association of Junior Leagues.Google Scholar
  24. Ribisl, K. & Davidson II, W. (1993). Community Change Interventions in: A. Goldstein & R.C. Huff, The Gang Intervention Handbook. p. 333–354. Champaign, Ill; Research Press.Google Scholar
  25. Rideau, W. (1994). Why prisons don't work.Time, 143(12), 80.Google Scholar
  26. Rutter, M. (1979). Protective factors in children's responses to stress and disadvantage. In M. W. Kent and J. Rolf (Eds.),Primary Prevention of Psychopathology, Vol. III: Social Competence in Children, pp. 49–74. Hanover, N. H., University Press of New England.Google Scholar
  27. Rutter, M. (1987). Psychosocial resilience and protective mechanisms. In J. E. Rolf, A. S. Masten, D. Cicchetti, K. Nuechterlein, & S. Weintraub (Eds.),Risk and Protective Factors in the Development of Psychopathology, New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Sherraden, M. S. (1993). Community studies in the Baccalaureate Social Work Curriculum.Journal of Teaching in Social Work, 7(1), 75–88.Google Scholar
  29. Spergel, I. A. (March 1992). Youth Gangs: An Essay Review.Social Service Review. 8(4) p. 121–37.Google Scholar
  30. Spergel, I. A. (1990). Youth gangs: Continuity and change. In M. Tonry and N. Morris (Eds.),Crime and justice: A review of the research (pp. 267–371). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  31. Spergel, I. A. (1986). The violent gang problem in Chicago: A local community approach.Social Service Review, 68: 94–131.Google Scholar
  32. Spergel, I. A. (1984). Violent gangs in Chicago: In search of social policy.Social Service Review, 58: 199–226.Google Scholar
  33. Strauss, A. & Corbin, J. (1990).Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  34. Thompson, D. & Jason, L. (September, 1988). Street Gangs and Preventive Interventions. Criminal Justice and Behavior. 15(3). p. 323–333.Google Scholar
  35. Tobler, N. (1986). Meta-analysis of 143 adolescent drug prevention programs: Quantitative outcome results of program participants compared to a control or comparison groups.Journal of Drug Issues, 16(4), 537–567.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Human Sciences Press, Inc. 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • David Derezotes
    • 1
  1. 1.Graduate School of Social WorkUniversity of UtahSalt Lake City

Personalised recommendations