Skip to main content
Log in

The use of bonding studies in child welfare permanency planning

  • Articles
  • Published:
Child and Adolescent Social Work Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article examines the use of bonding studies in permanency planning. It discusses the history, methods and controversies surrounding bonding studies. Approaches and protocols based on clinical experience are recommended.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ainsworth, M.D.S. & Wittig, B. (1969). Attachment and exploratory behavior of one year olds in a Strange Situation. In B. M. Foss (Ed.)Determinants of Infant Behavior, 111–136. London: Methuen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belsky, J., Youngblade, L. & Pensky, E. (1989). Childrearing history, marital quality, and maternal affect: Intergenerational transmission in a low-risk sample.Development and Psychopathology, 1, 291–304.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brodzinsky, David M. (1993). On the use and misuse of psychological testing in child custody evaluations.Professional Psychology Research & Practice, 24 (2), 213–219.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein, Joseph (1983). Interview with Joseph Goldstein. InSymposium: The Impact of Psychological Parenting on Child Welfare, Decision Making, New York University Review of Law and Social Change, XII (3), 575–590.

  • Goldstein, J., Freud, A., & Solnit, A. (1973).Beyond the Best Interests of the Child. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grisso, Thomas (1986).Evaluating Competencies: Forensic Assessments and Instruments. New York: Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jernberg, Ann M. (1979).Theraplay. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kobak, R. Rogers & Sceery, Amy (1988). Attachment in late adolescence: Working models, affect regulation, and representation of self and others.Child Development, 59, 135–146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lobar, Sandra L. & Phillips, Suzanne (1992). A clinical assessment strategy for maternal acquaintance-attachment behaviors.Issues in Comprehensive Pediatric Nursing, 15 (4), 249–259.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lowery, Carol R. (1984). The wisdom of Solomon: Criteria for child custody from the legal and clinical points of view.Law and Human Behavior, 8 (3/4).

  • Lytton, Hugh (1971). Observation studies of parent-child interaction: A methodological review.Child Development, 42 (3).

  • Main, M. & Goldwyn, R. (1985). An adult classification and rating system. Unpublished manuscript, University of California at Berkeley.

  • Marschak, Marianne (1960). A method for evaluating child-parent interaction under controlled conditions.The Journal of Genetic Psychology, 97, 3–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Mnookin, R. H. (1975). Child custody adjudication: Judicial functions in the face of indeterminacy.Law and Contemporary Problems, 39, 226–293.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schutz, Benjamin, Dixon, Ellen B., Lindenberger, Joanne C., & Ruther, Neil J. (1989).Solomon's Sword: A Practice Guide to Conducting Child Custody Evaluations. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solnit, Albert J. (1983). Psychological dimensions in child placement conflicts. InSymposium: The Impact of Psychological Parenting on Child Welfare Decision Making, New York University Review of Law and Social Change, XII (3), 495–500.

  • Spitz, Rene (1952). Shaping the Personality—the Role of Mother-Child Relations in Infancy. Denver: University of Colorado Medical School Film Archives.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stern, Daniel N. (1985).The Interpersonal World of the Infant. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Mr. Stokes is in private practice in Chicago, specializing in the treatment of children, adolescents and adoption issues. Ms. Strothman is in private practice in Chicago, specializing in family violence, treatment of children and adults, and foster care.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Stokes, J.C., Strothman, L.J. The use of bonding studies in child welfare permanency planning. Child Adolesc Soc Work J 13, 347–367 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01875913

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01875913

Keywords

Navigation