Skip to main content
Log in

Wilderness permit accuracy: Differences between reported and actual use

  • Research
  • Published:
Environmental Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Wilderness permits are valuable tools for recording backcountry use patterns. They provide a valuable basis upon which management decisions are made. Unfortunately, significant inaccuracies in reporting permit data result from noncompliance, transmission errors, and changes in visitor plans. Data from Sequoia and Kings Canyon National Parks in California show that in 1978, 97 percent of the parties obtained wilderness permits. Changes in visitor plans resulted in an over-reporting of total persons by 8 percent and of visitor nights by 23 percent. The latter was due primarily to shortening of trip length. Over-reporting was greatest when permits were issued well in advance of the trip. Backcountry managers should be aware of possible inaccuracies in permit data and may want to adjust for them under certain circumstances.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature cited

  • Fazio, J. R., and D. L. Gilbert. 1974. Mandatory wilderness permits: Some indications of success.J. For. 72:753–756.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hendee, J. C., and R. C. Lucas. 1973. Mandatory wilderness permits: a necessary management tool.J For. 71:206–209.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hendee, J. C., G. H. Stankey, and R. C. Lucas. 1978. Wilderness Management. USDA Forest Service Misc. Pub. 1365. 381 pp.

  • Kantola, W. W. 1976. Opinions and preferences of visitors towards alternatives for limiting use in the backcountry of Sequoia and Kings Canyon National Parks. M.S. Theis. Univ. of Oregon, Eugene, OR. 83 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lime, D. W., and R. G. Buchman. 1974. Putting wilderness permit information to work.J. For. 72:622–626.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lime, D. W., and G. A. Lorence. 1974. Improving estimates of wilderness use from mandatory travel permits. USDA For. Serv. Res. Paper NC-101, St Paul, MN. 7 pp.

  • Nie, N., C. Hull, J. Jenkins, K. Steinbrenner, and D. Brent. 1975. Statistical Package for the Social Sciences, 2nd edition. McGraw-Hill, New York, NY. 675 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parsons, D. J., T. J. Stohlgren, and P. A. Fodor. 1981. Establishing backcountry use quotas: An example from Mineral King, California.Environ. Manage. 5:335–340.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plager, A., and P. Womble. 1981. Compliance with backcountry permits in Mt. McKinley National Park.J. For. 79:155–156.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Wagtendonk, J. W. and J. M. Benedict. 1980. Wilderness permit compliance and validity.J. For. 78:388–401.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vaus, H. J., Jr. 1975. The distribution of income among wilderness uses.J. Leisure Res. 7:2937.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Parsons, D.J., Stohlgren, T.J. & Kraushaar, J.M. Wilderness permit accuracy: Differences between reported and actual use. Environmental Management 6, 329–335 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01875064

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01875064

Keywords

Navigation