Abstract
This paper addresses questions of affective responses of residents of rural Arizona to changes in proximate community and riparian landscapes and the congruence of their perceptions of change with physical measures of change in those landscapes. Based on findings and concepts from previous studies, perceptions of change were assessed using a mail survey. Physical measures of land use and vegetation change were obtained from aerial photography for two points in time spanning approximately 13 years and were analyzed using a geographic information system. Significant differences were found in perceptions of change in the community and riparian landscapes. In contrast with previous findings, a majority of respondents found the changes as either improving or having no effect on landscape quality. Those who were more frequent users of the riparian landscape tended to be more aware of changes in it. The findings also suggest challenges for planners and resource managers working in rural areas adjacent to riparian landscapes.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Literature cited
Aldwin, C., and D. Stokols. 1988. The effects of environmental change on individuals and groups: Some neglected issues in stress research.Journal of Environmental Psychology 8(1):57–75.
Dillman, D. A. 1978. Mail and telephone surveys. John Wiley & Sons, New York.
Jones, R. C. 1980. Behavioral causes and consequences of rural-urban migration: Special reference to Venezuela.In R. N. Thomas and J. M. Hunter (eds.), Internal migration systems in the developing world. GK Hall and Co., Boston.
Mileti, D. S. 1980. Human adjustment to the risk of environmental extremes.Sociology and Social Research 65:327–347.
Mitchell, J. K. 1984. Hazard perception studies: Convergent concerns and divergent approaches during the past decade.In T. F. Saarinen, D. R. Seamon and J. L. Sell (eds.), Environmental perception and behavior: Inventory and prospect. Department of Geography Research Paper No. 209. University of Chicago, Chicago.
Moore, G. T. 1982. Applied architectural research: Post-occupancy evaluation of buildings.Environment and Behavior 13(6):Special issue.
Newman, S. J., and G. J. Duncan. 1979. Residential problems, dissatisfaction and mobility.American Planning Association Journal 45:154–166.
Sell, J. L., and E. H. Zube. 1986. Perception of and response to environmental change.Journal of Architectural and Planning Research 3(1):33–54.
Sell, J. L., E. H. Zube, and C. Kennedy. 1988. Perception of land use change in a desert city.Journal of Architectural and Planning Research 5(2): 145–162.
Zube, E. H. 1987. Perceived land use patterns and landscape values.Landscape Ecology 1(1):37–45.
Zube, E. H., and J. L. Sell. 1986. Human dimensions of environmental change.Journal of Planning Literature 1(2): 192–176.
Zube, E. H., and D. E. Simcox. 1987. Arid lands, riparian landscapes and management conflicts.Environmental Management 11(4):529–535.
Zube, E. H., C. S. Law, and E. H. Carpenter. 1984. Arizona survey reveals anti-development attitude.Landscape Architecture 74(6):97–100.
Zube, E. H., D. E. Simcox, and M. H. Hoffman. 1986. Public perceptions and attitudes towards land use and land use change in the Upper San Pedro River Valley. School of Renewable Natural Resources, University of Arizona, Tucson.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zube, E.H., Friedman, S. & Simcox, D.E. Landscape change: Perceptions and physical measures. Environmental Management 13, 639–644 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01874970
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01874970