Advertisement

Annals of Operations Research

, Volume 2, Issue 1, pp 23–27 | Cite as

A taxonomy for decision models

  • Robert M. Thrall
Article

Abstract

Decision models can be classified according to the number of decision makers (x1), of decision criteria (x2), and of decisions called for (x3). If we allow eachx j to take one of the values ‘1’ or ‘m’ (many), we have 8 possible triples (x1,x2,x3) each of which defines or describes a class of decision models. The simplest and by far the most prevalent in textbooks and journals are the two (1, 1,m) and (1, 1, 1). The two classes (m, 1,x3) include most of game theory and models for fair allocation; the importance of these classes is widely comprehended. The classes (1,m,x3) are somewhat less well understood although increasingly recognized in the literature of decision models. The class (m, m, 1) has not achieved broad attention even though it relates to highly important national and worldwide problems. Finally, despite its potential importance, the class (m, m, m) has received almost no attention from modelers.

Keywords and phrases

Taxonomy classes decisions criteria decision makers 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    M.L. Balinski and H.P. Young,Fair Representation (Yale University Press, New Haven and London, 1982).Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    D. Cardus, C. Hammons and R.M. Thrall, Multiple objective benefit-cost models for decision makers, in:Decision Information, eds. Tsokos and Thrall (Academic Press, New York, 1979) Chapter 3.Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    A. Charnes, W.W. Cooper and E. Rhodes, Measuring the efficiency of decision making units, Eur. J. Oper. Res. 2(1978)429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    A. Charnes, W.W. Cooper and R.M. Thrall, Classifying and characterizing efficiencies and inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis, Center for Cybernetic Studies, Report 482, University of Texas at Austin, 1983.Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    R. Fare and C.A.K. Lovell, Measuring the technical efficiency of production, J. Economic Theory 19(1978)150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    R. Fare, S. Groskopf and C.A.K. Lovell, The measurement of efficiency of production, Dept. of Economics, Southern Illinois University at Carbondale, 1982.Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    R.A. Howard,Dynamic Programming and Markov Processes (MIT Press, Cambridge, 1960).Google Scholar
  8. [8]
    R.A. Howard,Dynamic Probabilistic Systems I: Markov Models (Wiley, New York, 1971).Google Scholar
  9. [9]
    R.L. Keeney and H. Raiffa,Decisions with Multiple Objectives, Preferences and Value Tradeoffs (Wiley, New York, 1976).Google Scholar
  10. [10]
    W.F. Lucas, The proof that a game may not have a solution, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 136 (1969)219.Google Scholar
  11. [11]
    G. Owen,Game Theory (2nd edition) (Academic Press, New York, 1982).Google Scholar
  12. [12]
    F.S. Roberts,Discrete Mathematical Models (Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, Prentice Hall, 1976).Google Scholar
  13. [13]
    M.K. Starr and M. Zeleny, eds.Multiple Criteria Decision Making, Vol. 6 ofStudies in the Management Sciences (North-Holland, Amsterdam-New York-Oxford, 1977).Google Scholar
  14. [14]
    R.M. Thrall and D. Cardus, Benefit-cost and cost effectiveness analysis in rehabilitation research programs, Methods of Information in Medicine 13(1974)147.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. [15]
    R.M. Thrall, D. Cardus and M.J. Fuhrer, Multicriterion decision analysis, inMathematical Frontiers of the Social and Policy Sciences, eds. Cobb and Thrall (Westview Press, Colorado, 1981) p. 131.Google Scholar
  16. [16]
    J. von Neumann and O. Morgenstern,The Theory of Games and Economic Behavior (2nd edition) (Princeton University Press, New Jersey, 1947).Google Scholar
  17. [17]
    H.M. Wagner,Principles of Operations Research (2nd edition) (Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, Prentice Hall, 1975).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© J. C. Baltzer A.G., Scientific Publishing Company 1984

Authors and Affiliations

  • Robert M. Thrall
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Mathematical SciencesRice UniversityHoustonUSA

Personalised recommendations