Environmental Management

, Volume 5, Issue 3, pp 213–224 | Cite as

Environmental management: A system approach

  • William J. Petak
Forum

Abstract

This paper presents a system framework whose purpose is to improve understanding of environmental management. By analyzing the links between elements of the environmental management system, it is possible to construct a model that aids thinking systematically about the decision-making subsystem, and other subsystems, of the entire environmental management system.

Through a multidisciplinary environmental approach, each of the individual subsystems is able to adapt to threats and opportunities. The fields of government, market economics, social responsibility and ecology, for example, are so complex that it is extremely difficult to develop a framework that gives full consideration to all aspects. This paper, through the application of a highly idealized system framework, attempts to show the general relationships that exist between complex system elements.

Keywords

Systems management Environmental management Decision making 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature cited

  1. Appleyard, D. 1973.Environmental planning and social sciences: Strategies for environmental decision making. Working Paper No. 217. Institute of Urban and Regional Development, University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar
  2. Arbuckle, J. G., S. W. Schroeden, and T. F. P. Sullivan. 1974.Environmental law for non-lawyers. Government Institutes, Inc., Bethesda, Maryland.Google Scholar
  3. Brecher, J. J. and M. E. Nestle. 1974.Environmental handbook. California Continuing Education of the Bar, Regents of the University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar
  4. Craik, K. H. and E. H. Zube (eds.). 1976.Perceiving environmental quality: Research and Applications. Vol. 9, Environmental Research. Plenum Publishing Company, New York.Google Scholar
  5. Davies, J. C. 1970.The politics of pollution. Pegasus, New York.Google Scholar
  6. Freeman, A. M., III, R. H. Haverman, and A. V. Kneese. 1973.The economics of environmental policy. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York.Google Scholar
  7. Industrial Union Department, AFL-CIO vs. American Petroleum Institute, et al. 2 July 1980. U.S. Supreme Court, 78–911.Google Scholar
  8. Joun, Y. P., 1973. Data requirements for aquality growth policy. InThe quality of life concept: A potential tool for decision makers. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D C. pp II-109–II-133.Google Scholar
  9. National Academy of Science-National Academy of Engineering. 1975.Planning for environmental indices. Environmental Studies Board, NAS-NAE, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  10. Petak, W. J. 1980. Environmental planning and management: The need for an integrated perspective.Environmental Management 4: 287–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Thomas, W. A. (ed.). 1972.Indicators of environmental quality. Plenum Publishing Corporation, New York.Google Scholar
  12. Yannacone, V., cited in Brecher, J. J. and M. E. Nestle. 1974.Environmental law handbook. California Continuing Education of the Bar, Regents of the University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag New York Inc. 1981

Authors and Affiliations

  • William J. Petak
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Public AdministrationUniversity of Southern CaliforniaUniversity Park, Los Angeles

Personalised recommendations