Abstract
The Supreme Court's interpretation of the commerce clause controls the balance of power between state and federal governments in the United States. An understanding of the relationship between the different government levels is essential for resource managers concerned with resource and environmental issues. This study examines selected Supreme Court decisions between 1976 and 1988 to answer three questions raised by the commerce clause: (1) Is the regulated item an article of commerce? (2) Do state laws burden interstate commerce? (3) Is federal commerce regulation limited? The balance of power among the justices and the commerce clause theories affecting the federal role in resource management are also examined. Since ratification of the Constitution, the Supreme Court has continuously increased federal power, but states have power to act independently as long as contradictory federal laws do not exist and state law does not impermissively affect commerce. If Congress regulates an individual's use of resources, their power is unquestioned. Future Court decisions will not significantly reduce the federal role in resource management even if the Court's membership changes. Even the supporters of states' rights on the Court realize increased federal power is a necessary part of the country's evolution. The purpose of the commerce clause is to create a national economic unit with free location principles. The Court supports this purpose today and will in the future.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Literature cited
Abraham, H. J. 1985. Justices and presidents, 2nd ed. Oxford University Press, New York.
American Trucking Assoc. Inc. v. Scheiner, 107 S.Ct. 2829. 1987.
Arizona Public Services v. Snead, 99 S.Ct. 1629. 1979.
Armco, Inc. v. Hardesty, 104 S.Ct. 2620. 1984.
Bacchus Imports, Ltd. v. Dias, 104 S.Ct. 3049. 1984.
Brown-Forman Distillers v. N.Y. State Liquor Authority, 106 S.Ct. 2080. 1986.
California Coastal Commission v. Granite Rock Co., 107 S.Ct. 1419. 1987.
Coggins, G. C. 1980. Wildlife and the Constitution: the walls come tumbling down.Washington Law Review. 55:295–358.
Coggins, G. C. 1983. Grizzly bears don't stop at customs: a preface to transboundary problems in natural resources law.Kansas Law Review 32:1–16.
Commonwealth Edison Co. v. Montana, 453 US 609. 1981.
Complete Auto Transit v. Brady, 97 S.Ct. 1076. 1977.
CTS Corp. v. Dynamics Corp. of America, 107 S.Ct. 1637. 1987.
Diamond, M. 1977. The Federalist on federalism: “Neither a national nor a federal Constitution, but a composition of both.”Yale Law Journal 86:1273–1285.
Dikshit, R. D. 1975. The political geography of federalism. John Wiley and Sons, New York.
Edgar v. MITE Corp., 102 S.Ct. 2629. 1982.
EEOC v. Wyoming, 103 S.Ct. 1054. 1983.
Eule, J. N. 1982. Laying the dormant commerce clause to rest.Yale Law Journal 91:425–485.
EXXON Corp. v. Governor of Maryland, 437 US 117. 1978.
FERC v. Mississippi, 456 US 742. 1982.
Frohnmayer, D. 1982. A new look at federalism: the theory and implications of “dual sovereignty.” Environmental Law. 12:903–919.
Garcia v. San Antonio Metropolitan Transit Authority. 105 S.Ct. 1005. 1985.
Geer v. Connecticut, 161 US 519. 1986.
Gibbons v. Ogden, 22 US 1. 1824.
Goetz, J. H. 1982. Federalism and natural resources.Montana Law Review 43:155–163.
Great Atlantic and Pacific Tea Co. Inc. v. Cottrell, 96 S.Ct. 923. 1976.
Harris, J. R., and C. C. Close. 1982. Redefining the state regulatory role.Environmental Law 12:921–930.
Hicklin v. Orbeck, 437 US 518. 1978.
Hodel v. Indiana, 452 US 314. 1981.
Hodel v. Virginia Surface Mining and Reclamation Association, 452 US 264. 1981.
Hudson County Water Co. v. McCarter, 209 US 349. 1908.
Huffman, J. 1982. Governing America's resources: federalism in the 1980's.Environmental Law 12:863–901.
Hughes v. Alexandria Scrap Corp., 426 US 794. 1976.
Hughes v. Oklahoma, 441 US 322. 1979.
Hunt v. Washington State Apple Advertising Commission, 432 US 333. 1977.
Kassel v. Consolidated Freightways, 450 US 662. 1981.
Lund, T. A. 1976. Early American wildlife law.New York University Law Review 51:703–730.
Lutz, R. E. 1983. Interstate environmental law: federalism bordering on neglect.South Western University Law Review 13:571–655.
Lyons, W. W. 1982. Federalism and resource development: a new role for states.Environmental Law 12:931–944.
Maine v. Taylor, 106 S.Ct. 2440. 1986.
Maltz, E. M. 1981. How much regulation is too much—an examination of commerce clause jurisprudence.George Washington Law Review 50:47–89.
Maryland v. Louisiana, 451 US 725. 1981.
McGinley, P. C. 1983. Federalism lives! reflections on the vitality of the federal system in the context of natural resource regulation.University of Kansas Law Review 32:147–163.
Merrion v. Jicarilla Apache Tribe, 102 S.Ct. 894. 1982.
Minnesota v. Clover Leaf Creamery Co., 449 US 456. 1981.
National League of Cities v. Usery, 426 US 833. 1976.
New England Power v. New Hampshire, 102 S.Ct. 1096. 1982.
Northeast Bancorp v. Board of Governors, 86 L. Ed. 2d 112. 1985.
Pacific Gas and Electric Co. v. State Energy Resources Conservation and Development Commission, 103 S.Ct. 1713. 1983.
Philadelphia v. New Jersey, 437 US 617. 1978.
Powell, J. 1982. The compleat Jeffersonian: Justice Rehnquist and federalism.Yale Law Journal 91:1317–1370.
Raymond Motor Transportation Inc. v. Rice, 434 US 429. 1978.
Reeves, Inc. v. Stake, 447 US 429. 1980.
Regan, D. H. 1986. The Supreme Court and state protectionism: making sense of the dormant commerce clause.Michigan Law Review 84:1001–1287.
Reid v. Colorado, 187 US 137. 1902.
Roalfe, W. R. 1965. How to find the law, 6th ed. West Publishing Co., St. Paul.
Rotunda, R. D. 1984. The doctrine of conditional preemption and other limitations on Tenth Amendment restrictions.University of Pennsylvania Law Review 132:289–325.
Sporhase v. Nebraska, 458 US 941. 1982.
South-Central Timber Development, Inc. v. Wunnicke, 104 S.Ct. 2237. 1984.
South Dakota v. Dole, 107 S.Ct. 2793. 1987.
State v. Sporhase, 305 N.W. 2d. 614 (Neb.). 1981.
Stewart, R. B. 1977. Pyramids of sacrifice? problems of federalism in mandating state implementation of national environmental policy.Yale Law Journal 86:1196–1272.
Stewart, R. B. 1982. Interstate resource conflicts: the role of the federal courts.Harvard Environmental Law Review 6:241–264.
Tarlock, A. D. 1983. National power, state resource sovereignty and federalism in the 1980's: scaling America's magic mountain.University of Kansas Law Review 32:111–145.
Thurlow v. Massachusetts, 46 US 504. 1847.
Tyler Pipe Industries v. Washington Department of Revenue, 107 S.Ct. 2810. 1987.
Tushnet, M. 1979. Rethinking the dormant commerce clause.Wisconsin Law Review 1979:125–165.
Wechsler, H. 1954. The political safeguards of federalism: the role of the states in the composition and selection of the national government.Columbia Law Review 54:543–560.
Western and Southern Life Insurance Co. v. State Board of Equalization, 101 S.Ct. 2070. 1981.
White v. Massachusetts Council of Construction Employees, Inc., 103 S.Ct. 1042. 1983.
Woodward, B., and S. Armstrong. 1979. The brethren: inside the Supreme Court. Simon and Schuster, New York.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Matthews, O.P. The Supreme Court, the commerce clause, and natural resources. Environmental Management 12, 413–427 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01873256
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01873256