Abstract
A spatial and temporal equilibrium model of production, consumption, prices, and transmission is constructed to determine the efficient pricing and allocation of electrical energy in the United States. Regional coordination is technically feasible and economically attractive. It also maximizes environmental efficiencies. The duplication of electrical generation and transmission facilities yields a misallocation of resources.
The utilities put forth specific arguments against coordinated operations. Yet in a fully integrated power system, each region would be expected to maximize the benefits of time diversity by purchasing from outside the region in lieu of the expansion of regional capacity. The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission has not yet made a serious move to encourage regional coordination and planning, but the Commission has the authority to promote such operations if it chooses to do so.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Literature cited
Breyer, S. G., and P. W. MacAvoy. 1974. Energy regulation by the Federal Power Commission. Brookings Institution, Washington. 163 pp.
Federal Power Commission. 1970. Federal Power Act. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington. 340 pp.
Federal Power Commission. 1971.1970 natural power survey. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington. 958 pp.
Graaff, J. de V. 1957. Theoretical welfare economics. Cambridge University Press, London. 178 pp.
Hotelling, H. 1938. The general welfare in relation to problems of taxation and of railway and, utility rates. Econometrica 6:242–269.
Joint Committee on Atomic Energy. 1973. Understanding the “national energy dilemma.” U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington. 66 pp.
Jurewitz, J. 1975. Toward a positive theory of pricing behavior in the regulated electric utility industry. Pages 119–150in C. T. Cicchetti and T. Turewitz, eds. Studies in electric utility regulation. Ballinger Publishing Company, Cambridge.
Mohring, H. 1970. The peak load pricing problems with increasing returns and pricing constraints. American Economic Review 60:693–705.
National Electric Reliability Council. 1975a. Review of overall reliability and adequacy of the North American bulk power systems. National Electric Reliability Council, Princeton. 24 pp.
National Electric Reliability Council. 1975. A study of interregional energy transfers. National Electric Reliability Council, Princeton. 41 pp.
Nixon, R. M. 1973. Messages from the President of the United States concerning energy resources. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington. 391 pp.
Samuelson, P. A. 1952. Spatial price equilibrium and linear programming. American Economic Review 42:283–303.
Takayama, T., and G. G. Judge. 1964. Equilibrium among spatially separated markets: a reformulation. Econometrica 32:510–524.
—. 1971. Spatial and temporal price and allocation models. North-Holland Publishing Company, Amsterdam. 528 pp.
Takayama, T., and A. D. Woodland. 1970. Equivalence of price and quantity formulations of spatial equilibrium: purified duality in quadratic and concave programming. Econometrica 38:889–906.
Turvey, R. 1969. Marginal cost. Economic Journal 79:282–299.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
The author is an economist with the Department of Energy. The views expressed are those of the author and do not necessarily represent the policies of the Department of Energy or the views of other staff members.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Uri, N.D. A Spatial equilibrium perspective for planning the production of electrical energy. Environmental Management 2, 413–421 (1978). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01872916
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01872916