Skip to main content
Log in

Smartness and stupidity in neurosis

  • Published:
The American Journal of Psychoanalysis Aims and scope

Conclusion

Neither absolute doubting of the validity of what others say, nor absolute acceptance, are healthy ways of using the intellect. In both instances real thinking is avoided and self-idealization increased. Unfettered thought, with real courage to make efforts at understanding, could express an ideal for analytic work as well as for living and growing. This is one of the freedoms an individual accords to himself and others, in the search for truth.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Authors

Additional information

Read before the Association for the Advancement of Psychoanalysis at the New York Academy of Medicine, November 22, 1950.

B.A., Cornell, 1927; M.D., Woman's Medical College of Pennsylvania, 1935; Lecturer, American Institute for Psychoanalysis and New School for Social Research; Fellow, American Psychiatric Association; Practicing psychoanalyst.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Van Bark, B.S. Smartness and stupidity in neurosis. Am J Psychoanal 11, 36–41 (1951). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01872803

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01872803

Navigation