Environmental Management

, Volume 9, Issue 1, pp 27–34 | Cite as

Woodlot scale: A method for rapid assessment of woodlot values

  • John R. Dorney
  • Lawrence A. Leitner
Profile

Abstract

A method is described for the rapid survey and determination of the ecological value of woodlots. The three dominant tree species in a stand are given a visual ranking that is converted to awoodlot index through the use of species adaptation values. The woodlot index is scaled by presettlement vegetation type to yield awoodlot scale. The ecologically most valuable woodlots in a region are identified by using the woodlot scale and data on woodlot area, human disturbance, and tree density. The woodlot index corresponds closely to results from conventional methods of woodlot surveys. This method should be valuable to land-use planners for environmental impact assessment and regional planning.

Key words

Environmental impact assessment Regional planning Site evaluation techniques Presettlement vegetation 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature cited

  1. Archibold, O. W., and M. R. Wilson. 1980. The natural vegetation of Saskatchewan prior to agricultural settlement.Canadian Journal of Botany 58:2031–2042.Google Scholar
  2. Bakuzis, E. V., and H. I. Hansen. 1959. A provisional assessment of species synecological requirements in Minnesota forests. Minnesota Forestry Notes no. 84. University of Minnesota, St. Paul.Google Scholar
  3. Brady, R. F., T. Tobias, P. F. J. Eagles, R. Ohrner, J. Micak, B. Veale, and R. S. Dorney. 1979. A typology for the urban ecosystem and its relationship to larger biogeographic landscape units.Urban Ecology 4:11–28.Google Scholar
  4. Brush, R. O., D. N. Williamson, and J. G. Fabos. 1979. Visual screening potential of forest vegetation.Urban Ecology 4:207–216.Google Scholar
  5. Bryant, W. S., M. E. Wharton, W. H. Martin, and J. B. Varner. 1980. The Blue Ash-Oak savanna woodland, a remnant of presettlement vegetation in the Inner Bluegrass of Kentucky.Castanea 45:149–164.Google Scholar
  6. Buell, M. F., A. N. Langford, D. W. Davidson, and L. F. Ohmann. 1966. The upland forest continuum in northern New Jersey.Ecology 47:416–432.Google Scholar
  7. Chanasyk, V. 1970. The Haldimand-Norfolk environmental assessment. Ontario Ministry of Treasury, Economics and Intergovernmental Affairs, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.Google Scholar
  8. Cottam, G. 1949. The phytosociology of an oak woods in southwestern Wisconsin.Ecology 30:271–287.Google Scholar
  9. Curtis, J. T. 1959. The vegetation of Wisconsin: an ordination of plant communities. University of Wisconsin Press, Madison, WI. 657 pp.Google Scholar
  10. Delcourt, H. R., and P. A. Delcourt. 1974. Primeval magnolia-holly-beech climax in Louisiana.Ecology 55:638–644.Google Scholar
  11. Delcourt, H. R., and P. A. Delcourt. 1977. Presettlement magnolia-beech climax of the Gulf Coastal Plain: quantitative evidence from the Appalachicola River bluffs, north-central Florida.Ecology 58:1085–1093.Google Scholar
  12. Dorney, J. R. 1981. Presettlement vegetation of southeastern Wisconsin: edaphic relationships and disturbance. MS thesis, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee.Google Scholar
  13. Dorney, R. S. 1977. Biophysical and cultural-historical land classification and mapping for Canadian urban and urbanizing land.In Ecological (biophysical) land classification in urban areas. Ecological Land Classification series no. 3, Lands Directorate, Fisheries and Environment Canada.Google Scholar
  14. Eagles, P. F. J. 1981. Environmentally sensitive area planning in Ontario, Canada.American Planning Association Journal 47:313–323.Google Scholar
  15. Finley, R. W. 1976. Original vegetation cover of Wisconsin from U.S. General Land Office notes. USDA Forest Service, North Central Forest Experiment Station, St. Paul, MN.Google Scholar
  16. Forman, R. T. T., A. E. Galli, and C. F. Leck. 1976. Forest size and avian diversity in New Jersey woodlots with some land use implications.Oecologia 26:1–8.Google Scholar
  17. Forman, R. T. T., and M. Godron. 1981. Patches and structural components for a landscape ecology.BioScience 31:733–740.Google Scholar
  18. Gehlbach, F. R. 1975. Investigation, evaluation, and priority ranking of natural areas.Biological Conservation 8:79–88.Google Scholar
  19. Goff, F. G., G. A. Dawson, and J. J. Rochow. 1982. Site examination for threatened and endangered plant species.Environmental Management 6:307–316.Google Scholar
  20. Goodfellow, S., and G. F. Peterken. 1981. A method for survey and assessment of woodlands for nature conservation using maps and species lists: the example of Norfolk woodlands.Biological Conservation 21:177–195.Google Scholar
  21. Keyes, D. L. 1976. Land development and the natural environment: estimating impacts. Urban Institute, Washington, DC 128 pp.Google Scholar
  22. Kline, V. M., and G. Cottam. 1979. Vegetation response to climate and fire in the driftless area of Wisconsin.Ecology 60:861–868.Google Scholar
  23. Leitner, L. A., and M. T. Jackson. 1981. Presettlement forests of the unglaciated portion of southern Illinois.American Midland Naturalist 105:290–304.Google Scholar
  24. Levenson, J. P. 1976. Forested woodlots as biogeographic islands in an urban-agricultural matrix. PhD dissertation, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee.Google Scholar
  25. Lindsey, A. A., R. O. Petty, D. K. Sterling, and W. van Asdall. 1961. Vegetation and environment along the Wabash and Tippecanoe rivers.Ecological Monographs 31:105–156.Google Scholar
  26. Little, E. L., Jr. 1979. Checklist of United States trees (native and naturalized). USDA Forest Service, Agricultural Handbook no. 541. Washington, DC 375 pp.Google Scholar
  27. Lussenhop, J. 1978. Urban cemetaries as bird refuges.Condor 79:456–461.Google Scholar
  28. Matthiae, P., and F. Stearns. 1981. Mammals in forest islands in southeastern Wisconsin.In R. L. Burgess and D. M. Sharpe (eds.), Forest dynamics in man-dominated landscapes. Springer-Verlag, New York.Google Scholar
  29. McBride, J. R. 1977. Evaluation of vegetation in environmental planning.Landscape Planning 4:291–312.Google Scholar
  30. McEntyre, J. G. 1978. Land survey systems. John Wiley and Sons, New York. 537 pp.Google Scholar
  31. Mudrak, F. 1978. Equilibrium dynamics of oak islands in southeastern Wisconsin. MS thesis, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee.Google Scholar
  32. Mueller-Dombois, D., and H. Ellenberg. 1974. Aims and methods of vegetation ecology. John Wiley and Sons, New York. 547 pp.Google Scholar
  33. Rau, J. G., and D. C. Wooten (eds.). 1980. Environmental impact analysis handbook. McGraw-Hill, New York 642 pp.Google Scholar
  34. Robbins, C. S. 1979. Effects of forest fragmentation on bird populations.In R. M. De Graaf and K. E. Evans (eds.), Proceedings of the workshop on management of northcentral and northeastern forests for nongame birds. USDA Forest Service, North Central Forest Experiment Station, St. Paul, MN.Google Scholar
  35. Russell, E. W. B. 1981. Vegetation of northern New Jersey before European settlement.American Midland Naturalist 105:1–12.Google Scholar
  36. Siccama, T. 1971. Presettlement and present forest vegetation in northern Vermont with special reference to Chittenden County.American Midland Naturalist 85:153–172.Google Scholar
  37. Suffling, R. 1980. An index of ecological sensitivity to disturbance, based on ecosystem age, and related to landscape diversity.Journal of Environmental Management 10:235–262.Google Scholar
  38. Van der Ploeg, S. W. F., and L. Vlijm. 1978. Ecological evaluation, nature conservation and land use planning with particular reference to methods used in the Netherlands.Biological Conservation 14:197–221.Google Scholar
  39. Wikum, D. A., and G. F. Shanholtzer. 1978. Application of the Braun-Blanquet cover-abundance scale for vegetation analysis in land development studies.Environmental Management 2:323–329.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag New York Inc. 1985

Authors and Affiliations

  • John R. Dorney
    • 1
  • Lawrence A. Leitner
    • 1
  1. 1.Botany DepartmentUniversity of Wisconsin-MilwaukeeMilwaukeeUSA

Personalised recommendations