Advertisement

The Journal of Membrane Biology

, Volume 35, Issue 1, pp 39–55 | Cite as

Divalent cation binding to phospholipids: An EPR study

  • J. S. Puskin
Article

Summary

Divalent cation association to sonicated phospholipid liposomes has been examined with electron paramagnetic spectroscopy. Spectra were obtained suggesting that, in some cases, divalent cations associated with acidic phospholipid head groups are highly mobile.

Using the amplitude of its characteristic sextet signal as a measure of free Mn(H2O) 6 ++ , the apparent affinities of cardiolipin and phosphatidylserine for Mn2+ were measured as a function of monovalent electrolyte. Monovalent cations having smaller nonhydrated radii were more effective in displacing Mn from the phospholipids. Under conditions of low divalent cation concentrations, it is shown that the Gouy-Chapman diffuse double layer theory predicts a Mn-affinity (K A ) inversely proportional to the square of monovalent salt concentration. Although this relationship was closely obeyed for Mn binding to cardiolipin, the fall-off inK A with added sodium chloride was slower in the cases of Mn binding to phosphatidylserine or phosphatidic acid.

When phosphatidylcholine or cholesterol was incorporated into mixed vesicles along with a fixed amount of charged phospholipid, the Mn-binding strength was roughly proportional to the weight fraction of the latter. This result is consistent with: (1) a random dispersal of lipids in the bilayer, and (2) a 1:2 divalent cation-phospholipid interaction.

Keywords

Divalent Cation Phosphatidic Acid Diffuse Double Layer Phospholipid Liposome Monovalent Salt 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abramson, M.B., Katzman, R., Gregor, H., Curci, R. 1966. The reactions of cations with aqueous dispersions of phosphatidic acid. Determination of stability constants.Biochemistry 5:2207Google Scholar
  2. Barlow, C.A., Jr. 1970. The electrical double layer.In: Physical Chemistry, An Advanced TreatiseIXA. H. Eyring, D. Henderson, and W. Jost, editors. p. 167. Academic Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  3. Burlamacchi, L. 1971. Motional correlation time in the electron spin relaxation of6S spin state ions in solution.J. Chem. Phys. 55:1205Google Scholar
  4. Chapman, D.L. 1913. A contribution to the theory of electrocapillarity.Philos. Mag. 25:475Google Scholar
  5. Cohn, M., Townsend, J. 1954. A study of manganous complexes by paramagnetic resonance absorption.Nature (London) 173:1090Google Scholar
  6. Cole, K.S. 1969. Zeta potential and discretevs. uniform surface charges.Biophys. J. 9:465Google Scholar
  7. Gersmann, H.R., Swalen, J.D. 1962. Electron paramagnetic resonance spectra of copper complexes.J. Chem. Phys. 36:3221Google Scholar
  8. Gilbert, D.L., Ehrenstein, G. 1969. Effect of divalent cations on potassium conductance of squid axons: Determination of surface charge.Biophys. J. 9:447Google Scholar
  9. Goldammer, E. von, Müller, A., Conway, B.E. 1973. Electron paramagnetic relaxation and EPR-line shapes of manganese ions in sulfonated polysterene ion-exchange resin at various degrees of hydration.Ber. Bunsenges. Phys. Chem. 78:35Google Scholar
  10. Gouy, G. 1910. Sur la constitution de la charge électrique a la surface d'un électrolyte.J. Phys. (Paris) 4:457Google Scholar
  11. Hauser, H., Chapman, D., Dawson, R.M.C. 1969. Ca2+ binding to monolayers of phosphatidylserine and phosphatidylinositol.Biochim. Biophys. Acta 183:320Google Scholar
  12. Hauser, H., Darke, A., Phillips, M.C. 1976. Ion-binding to phospholipids. Interaction of calcium with phosphatidylserine.Eur. J. Biochem. 62:335Google Scholar
  13. Haynes, D.H. 1974. 1-Anilino-8-naphthalensulfonate: A fluorescent indicator of ion binding and electrostatic potential on the membrane surface.J. Membrane Biol. 17:341Google Scholar
  14. Hendrickson, H.S., Fullington, J.G. 1965. Stabilities of metal complexes of phospholipids.Biochemistry 4:1599Google Scholar
  15. Jacobson, K., Papahadjopoulos, D. 1975. Phase transitions and phase separations in phospholipid membranes induced by changes in temperature, pH and concentration of bivalent cations.Biochemistry 14:152Google Scholar
  16. Kivelson, D., Neiman, R. 1961. ESR studies on the bonding in copper complexes.J. Chem. Phys. 35:149Google Scholar
  17. Kneubühl, F.K. 1960. Line shapes of electron paramagnetic resonance signals produced by powders, glasses, and viscous liquids.J. Chem. Phys. 33:1074Google Scholar
  18. McLaughlin, S.G.A., Szabo, G., Eisenman, G. 1971. Divalent ions and the surface potential of charged phospholipid membranes.J. Gen. Physiol. 58:667Google Scholar
  19. Morgan, L.O., Noble, A.W. 1959. Proton spin relaxation in aqueous solutions of paramagnetic ions.J. Chem. Phys. 31:365Google Scholar
  20. Ohnishi, S., Ito, T. 1973. Clustering of lecithin molecules in phosphatidylserine membranes induced by calcium binding to phosphatidylserine.Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 51:132Google Scholar
  21. Poupko, R., Luz, Z. 1972. ESR and NMR in aqueous and methanol solutions of copper (II) solvates. Temperature and magnetic field dependence of electron and nuclear spin relaxation.J. Chem. Phys. 57:3311Google Scholar
  22. Reed, G.H., Cohn, M. 1970. Electron paramagnetic resonance spectra of manganese (II)-protein complexes. Manganese (II)-concanavlin A.J. Biol. Chem. 245:662Google Scholar
  23. Reed, G.H., Leigh, J.S., Jr., Pearson, J.E. 1971. Electron paramagnetic relaxation and EPR line shapes of manganous ion complexes in aqueous solutions. Frequency and ligand dependence.J. Chem. Phys. 55:3311Google Scholar
  24. Reed, G.H., Ray, W.J., Jr. 1971. Electron paramagnetic studies of manganese (II) coordination in the phosphoglucomutase system,Biochemistry 10:3191Google Scholar
  25. Seaman, G.V.F. 1973. The surface chemistry of the erythrocyte and thrombocyte membrane.J. Supramolec. Struct. 1:437Google Scholar
  26. Sheehan, W.H. 1970. Physical Chemistry. p. 516. Allyn & Bacon, BostonGoogle Scholar
  27. Stigter, D. 1975. Micelle Formation by ionic surfacants. III. Model of Stern layer, ion distribution, and potential fluctuations.J. Phys. Chem. 79:1008Google Scholar
  28. Umezawa, K., Yamabe, T. 1972. ESR investigation of copper ions on cation exchange resins.Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 45:56Google Scholar
  29. Verkleij, A.J., Kruyff, B. de, Ververgaert, P.H.J.Th., Tocanne, J.F., Deenen, L.L.M. van 1974. The influence of pH, Ca2+ and protein on the thermotropic behavior of the negatively charged phospholipid, phosphatidylglycerol.Biochim. Biophys. Acta 339:432Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag New York Inc. 1977

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. S. Puskin
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Radiation Biology and BiophysicsUniversity of Rochester School of Medicine and DentistryRochester

Personalised recommendations