Advertisement

Environmental Management

, Volume 4, Issue 5, pp 391–405 | Cite as

Environmental problem-solving and land-use management: A proposed structure for Australia

  • Arthur Conacher
Profile

Abstract

A three-tiered structure of land-use and environmental management is here proposed for Australia. The structure is based on the idea that “environment” means the environment of people, and that “environmental problems” arise when a change in the interaction between people and their environment leads to conflicts about the use of land and resources. The heterogeneity of society means that a range of human aspirations and value systems must be satisfied by environmental managers. Existing methods of environmental management fail to achieve these objectives, due to inadequate perception of environmental problems by decision-makers, and the inability of currently available impact assessment techniques to resolve human conflicts associated with the use of land and resources. The main work of planning and managing land use and the environment would be carried out by regional authorities, supported by federal and state policy. Examples are given of moves towards regional administration in England and Wales, Western Australia, Australia and New Zealand. Community participation in the decision-making process is essential and can be achieved by electoral representation to the authoritative bodies and through procedures that ensure informed public comment on planning proposals.

Key words

Environmental management land use environmental problem quality of life community participation Australia federal state, and regional authorities environmental impact assessment Land Use and Environmental Management Authorities (LUEMAS) 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature cited

  1. Alcoa Australia. 1978. Wagerup alumina project environmental review and management programme. Perth. 486 pp., Appendices.Google Scholar
  2. Australian Advisory Committee on the Environment. 1974. Land use in Australia. Australian Advisory Committee on the Environment Report 4, Department of Environment and Conservation, Austr. Govt. Publ. Serv., Canberra. 73 pp.Google Scholar
  3. Basinski, J. J., ed. 1978. Land use on the South Coast of New South Wales. A study in methods of acquiring and using information to analyse regional land use options. Volume 1, General Report. Comm. Sci. & Ind. Res. Organisation, Melbourne. 129 pp.Google Scholar
  4. Bowman, M. 1979. Australian approaches to environmental management: the response of State planning. Environmental Law Reform Group Publn. 6, University of Tasmania, Hobart. 511 pp.Google Scholar
  5. Bowmar, C. E. 1977. Rural opposition to large regions. N.Z. Local Govt. 13(3). 13 pp.Google Scholar
  6. Canter, L. W. 1977. Environmental impact assessment. McGraw-Hill, N.Y. 331 pp.Google Scholar
  7. Conacher, A. J. 1975. Environment-industry conflict: the Manjimup woodchip industry proposal, southwestern Australia. Geowest 4, Department of Geography, University of Western Australia. 43 pp.Google Scholar
  8. Conacher, A. J. 1977. Conservation and geography: the case of the Manjimup woodchip industry, southwestern Australia. Aust. Geog. Studies 15(2): 104–22.Google Scholar
  9. Conacher, A. J. 1978. Resources and environmental management: some fundamental concepts and definitions. Search 9(12):437–41.Google Scholar
  10. Conacher, A. J. 1979. Water quality and forests in southwestern Australia: review and evaluation. Aust. Geog. 14(3): 150–9.Google Scholar
  11. Conacher, A. J. 1980. Environmental legislation in Western Australia. Aust. Geog. Studies.Google Scholar
  12. Dames and Moore. 1975. A report on data management for power plant siting: Delmarva Interface Study. Dames and Moore Planning Systems Group, Los Angeles. 68 pp.Google Scholar
  13. Department of Conservation and Environment Western Australia. 1978. Procedures for environmental assessment of proposals in Western Australia. Dept. Cons. & Envt. Bull. 38. 11 pp.Google Scholar
  14. Department of Environment Welsh Office. 1974. Local government in England and Wales: a guide to the new system. H.M. Stationery Office, London. 275 pp.Google Scholar
  15. Department of Urban and Regional Development. 1973. Regions: a suggested delimitation of regions for the purpose of Section 17 of the Grants Commission Act, October 1973. Aust. Govt. Publ. Serv., Canberra. Parl. Paper 246.65 pp.Google Scholar
  16. Dickinson, R. E. 1947. City region and regionalism: a geographical contribution to human ecology. Routledge & Kegan Paul Ltd., London. 327 pp.Google Scholar
  17. Dickinson, R. E. 1964. City and region: a geographical interpretation. Routledge & Kegan Paul Ltd., London. 588 pp.Google Scholar
  18. Elliott, M., ed. 1977. Ground for concern: Australia's uranium and human survival. Penguin, Harmondsworth, England. 235 pp.Google Scholar
  19. Forests Department Western Australia. n.d. (1973) Marri wood chip project environmental impact statement. Perth. 34 pp., Appendices.Google Scholar
  20. Gentilli, J. 1979. Regions and landscapes: nature and size, function and change. Ch. 1in J. Gentilli (Ed.), Western Landscapes, University of Western Australia Press, pp. 3–48.Google Scholar
  21. Hagan, J. 1972. Clutha: the politics of pollution. Politics 7:136–48.Google Scholar
  22. Lake Pedder Committee of Enquiry. 1974. Final report, April 1974. The flooding of Lake Pedder: an analysis of the Lake Pedder controversy and its implications for the planning of major development projects and the management of natural resources in Australia. Aust. Govt. Publ. Serv. for the Dept. Cons. & Envt., Canberra. 317 pp.Google Scholar
  23. Leopold, L. B., F. E. Clarke, B. B. Hanshaw and J. R. Balsley. 1971. A procedure for evaluating environmental impact. U.S. Geol. Surv. Circular 645. 13 pp.Google Scholar
  24. Lustig, K. 1979. Entropy and environmental impact. Search 10(4): 115.Google Scholar
  25. MacKinnon, G. C. and K. Newman. 1977. Agreement on guidelines for co-operation in environmental analysis of proposals by the Commonwealth Minister for Environment, Housing and Community Development and the Western Australian Minister for Conservation and the Environment, 17 May 1977. 3 pp.Google Scholar
  26. McHarg, I. L. 1969. Design with nature. Natural History Press for the Amer. Museum of Natural History, New York. 1977 197 pp.Google Scholar
  27. Mercer, D. 1979. Victoria's land conservation council and the alpine region. Aust. Geog. Studies 17(2): 107–30.Google Scholar
  28. Mitchell, C. W. 1973. Terrain evaluation. Longman, London. 221 pp.Google Scholar
  29. Munn, R. E., ed. 1975. Environmental impact assessment: principles and procedures. Scientific Committee on Problems of the Environment Report 5, Toronto. 173 pp.Google Scholar
  30. O'Brien, B. J. and R. B. Lansdown. 1977. Arrangements concerning co-operation in the environmental assessment of proposals between the Commonwealth Department of Environment, Housing and Community Development and the Western Australian Department of Conservation and Environment, 15 July 1977. 8 pp.Google Scholar
  31. Office of Regional Administration and the North West. 1977. Regional administration and planning in Western Australia. Perth. (not paginated).Google Scholar
  32. O'Riordan, T. 1971. Perspectives on resource management. Pion Ltd., London. 183 pp.Google Scholar
  33. O'Riordan, T. 1976. Environmentalism. Pion Ltd., London. 373 pp.Google Scholar
  34. Porter, C. F., P. R. Adams and A. R. Main. 1978. Wagerup Alumina refinery proposal by Alcoa of Australia Limited: report and recommendations by the Environmental Protection Authority. Dept. Cons. & Envt. Western Australia Bull. 50. 37 pp.Google Scholar
  35. Rankin, D. G. 1979. Auckland Regional Authority 1963–1978. N.Z. Geog. 35(1):41–3.Google Scholar
  36. Reynolds Australia Alumina Ltd. 1978. Worsley Alumina project environmental review and management programme. Paginated by sections.Google Scholar
  37. Rosen, S. J. 1976. Manual for environmental impact evaluation. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J. 232 pp.Google Scholar
  38. Routley, R. and V. Routley. 1975. The fight for the forests: the takeover of Australian forests for pines, wood chips and intensive forestry, 3rd ed. Research School of Social Sciences, Australian National University, Canberra. 407 pp.Google Scholar
  39. Senate Standing Committee on Science and the Environment. 1977. Woodchips and the environment. Austr. Govt. Publ. Service, Canberra. 454 pp.Google Scholar
  40. South-West Forests Defence Foundation. 1979. Noncompliance with the provisions for environmental protection in the marri woodchip project environmental impact statement. P.O. Box 203, Nedlands, Western Australia. 28 pp.Google Scholar
  41. Technical Advisory Group. 1978. Bauxite mining in the Darling Range Western Australia: A review for the Environmental Protection Authority. Dept. Cons. & Envt. Western Australia Bull. 44. 126 pp.Google Scholar
  42. Thomas, K. J. 1977. Reorganisation of Local Government in New Zealand. N.Z. Local Govt. 13(4). 31 pp.Google Scholar
  43. Walter, T. S. 1976. Some cost-benefit aspects of wood chipping in Western Australia. Economic Activity 19(4):56–65.Google Scholar
  44. Western Mining Corporation Ltd. 1978. Yeelirrie uranium project draft environmental impact statement/environmental review and management programme. Paginated by sections.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag New York Inc 1980

Authors and Affiliations

  • Arthur Conacher
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of GeographyUniversity of Western AustraliaNedlandsAustralia

Personalised recommendations