Skip to main content
Log in

Turgor pressure and cell volume relaxation inHalicystis parvula

  • Articles
  • Published:
The Journal of Membrane Biology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

The elastic modulus, ε, for the cell wall ofHalicystis parvula (defined by\(\varepsilon = V\frac{{dP}}{{dV}}\)) was determined by two different ways:

  1. 1)

    By measuring the stationary pressure-volume curve and by calculating the long-term elastic coefficient,ɛ s, from the slope of the curve at a given volume and

  2. 2)

    By measuring differential changes in cell turgor pressure and cell volume using the pressure probe technique and by calculating the short-term elastic coefficient, ε, according to the definition equation. The values of the elastic coefficients differ considerably and show different dependences on cell turgor pressure.ɛ s is about 0.5 to 2 bar, and is therefore in agreement with measurements of Graves and Gutknecht (Graves, J., Gutknecht, J. (1976)J. Gen. Physiol. 67 ∶ 579) on perfused cells ofH. parvula.ɛ s is almost pressure independent within the pressure range of 0.05 to 0.9 bar.

On the other hand, ε assumes values of about 1 to 2 bar at a low pressure (about 0.05 to 0.15 bar) and increases to about 16 bar at 0.9 bar turgor pressure. Evidence is presented that the short-term elastic coefficient, ε, determined from differential changes in cell turgor pressure,dP, and cell volume,dV, reflects the true elastic properties of the cell wall, whereas the long-term elastic coefficient,ɛ s, also includes other mechanical properties of the cell wall, which could not be identified up to now. The hydraulic conductivity,L p, of the cell membrane ofH. parvula was determined by directly measuring both the turgor pressure relaxation process (pressure probe) and the volume changes (microscope) in response to osmotic stress.L p was calculated from the slope of volume-time curves without knowledge of the elastic modulus. It has a value of about 0.8 to 2×10−6 cm sec−1 bar−1. The calculation ofL p from the turgor pressure relaxation process leads to identical results when using the short-term elastic coefficient. Under these conditionsL p assumes values of about 1.5 to 2.5×10−6 cm sec−1 bar−1.L p increases as the plasmolytic point is approached.

The result demonstrates that the short-term elastic coefficient determined by the pressure probe technique controls the instantaneous water transport between the cell interior and the external medium. The high extensibility of the cell wall (resulting from the low elastic coefficient) is the reason whyH. parvula exhibits a change in cell volume rather than a change in cell turgor. The results are discussed in relation to pressure measurements in individual cells of higher plant tissues.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Blinks, L.R. 1934. Protoplasmic potentials inHalicystis. IV. Vacuolar perfusion with artificial sap and sea-water.J. Gen. Physiol. 18:409

    Google Scholar 

  2. Cleland, R. 1971. Cell wall extension.Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. 22:197

    Google Scholar 

  3. Dainty, J. 1963. Water relations of Plant cells.Adv. Bot. Res. 1:279

    Google Scholar 

  4. Dainty, J. 1972. Plant water relations: The elasticity of the cell wall.Proc. R. Soc. Edinburgh A 70:89

    Google Scholar 

  5. Graves, J., Gutknecht, J. 1976. Ion transport studies and determination of the cell wall elasticity in the marine algaeHalicystis parvula.J. Gen. Physiol. 67:579

    Google Scholar 

  6. Graves, J., Gutknecht, J. 1977a. Chloride transport and membrane potential in the marine algaHalicystis parvula.J. Membrane Biol. 36:65

    Google Scholar 

  7. Graves, J., Gutknecht, J. 1977b. Current-voltage relationship and voltage sensitivity of the Cl-pump inHalicystis parvula.J. Membrane Biol. 36:83

    Google Scholar 

  8. Gutknecht, J., Hastings, D.F., Bisson, M.A. 1978. Ion transport and turgor pressure regulation in giant algal cells.In: Membrane Transport in Biology. G. Giebisch, D.C. Tosteson, and H.H. Ussing, editors. pp. 125–174 Springer Verlag, Berlin-Heidelberg-New York

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hüsken, D., Steudle, E., Zimmermann, U. 1978. Pressure probe technique for measuring water relations of cells in higher plants.Plant Physiol. 61:158

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kamiya, N., Tazawa, M., Takata, T. 1963. The relation of turgor pressure to cell volume inNitella with special reference to mechanical properties of the cell wall.Protoplasma 57:501

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kedem, O., Katchalsky, A. 1958. Thermodynamic analysis of the permeability of biological membranes to non-electrolytes.Biochim. Biophys. Acta 27:229

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kornmann, P. 1938. Zur Entwicklungsgeschichte von Derbesia und Halicystis.Planta 28:464

    Google Scholar 

  13. Philip, J.R. 1958. The osmotic cell wall, solute diffusibility, and the plant water economy.Plant Physiol. 33:264

    Google Scholar 

  14. Steudle, E., Lüttge, U., Zimmermann, U. 1975. Water relations of epidermal bladder cells of the hylophytic speciesMesembryanthemum crystallinum: Direct measurements of the hydrostatic pressure and hydraulic conductivity.Planta 126:229

    Google Scholar 

  15. Steudle, E., Zimmermann U. 1974. Determination of the hydraulic conductivity and of reflection coefficients inNitella flexilis by means of direct cell-turgor pressure measurements.Biochim. Biophys. Acta 332:399

    Google Scholar 

  16. Steudle, E., Zimmermann, U., Lüttge, U. 1977. Effect of turgor pressure and cell size on the wall elasticity of plant cells.Plant Physiol. 59:285

    Google Scholar 

  17. Tazawa, M., Kamiya, N. 1965. Water relations of a Characean internodal cell.Annu. Rev. Biol. Works Fac. Sci. Osaka 13:123

    Google Scholar 

  18. Zimmermann, U. 1978. Physics of turgor- and osmoregulation.Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. 29:121

    Google Scholar 

  19. Zimmermann, U., Hüsken, D. 1979. Theoretical and experimental exclusion of errors in the determination of the elasticity and water transport parameters of plant cells by the pressure probe technique.Plant Physiol. 64:18

    Google Scholar 

  20. Zimmermann, U., Steudle, E. 1974a. The pressure dependence of the hydraulic conductivity, the membrane resistance and membrane potential during turgor pressure regulation inValonia utricularis.J. Membrane Biol. 16:331

    Google Scholar 

  21. Zimmermann, U., Steudle, E. 1974b. Hydraulic conductivity and volumetric elastic modulus in giant algal cells: Pressure- and volume-dependence.In: Membrane Transport in Plants. U. Zimmermann, and J. Dainty, editors. pp. 64–71. Springer Verlag, Berlin-Heidelberg-New York

    Google Scholar 

  22. Zimmermann, U., Steudle, E. 1978. Physical aspects of water relations of plant cells.Adv. Bot. Res. 6:45

    Google Scholar 

  23. Zimmermann, U., Steudle, E. 1980. Fundamental water relations parameters.In: Plant Membrane Transport: Current Conceptual Issues. R.M. Spanswick, W.J. Lucas, and J. Dainty, editors. pp. 113–127. Elsevier/North-Holland, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zimmermann, U., Hüsken, D. Turgor pressure and cell volume relaxation inHalicystis parvula . J. Membrain Biol. 56, 55–64 (1980). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01869352

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01869352

Keywords

Navigation