Advertisement

The Journal of Membrane Biology

, Volume 27, Issue 1, pp 393–408 | Cite as

On the mechanism of electrical coupling between cells of earlyXenopus embryos

  • R. A. DiCaprio
  • A. S. French
  • E. J. Sanders
Article

Summary

The mechanism of electrical coupling between cells of earlyXenopus embryos has been studied by examination of the nonjunctional membrane resistances and capacitances as a function of cleavage stage, the junctional and nonjunctional membrane resistances as functions of time during the first cleavage, and the electrical properties of the primitive blastocoel. The changes in membrane resitances and capacitances during the first two cleavages may be completely explained by the addition of new membrane, identical in specific resistance and capacitance to the original membrane, at a constant rate to furrows which are electrically connected to the perivitelline space. Microelectrode recording from the primitive blastocoel indicates that there is no electrical difference detectable between it and the perivitelline space. These results are discussed in the context of current theories of the mechanism of intercellular electrotonic coupling.

Keywords

Human Physiology Electrical Property Current Theory Membrane Resistance Cleavage Stage 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Azarnia, R., Larsen, W.J., Loewenstein, W.R. 1974. The membrane junctions in communicating and non-communicating cells, their hybrids and segregants.Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 71:880PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Bennett, M.V.L. 1973. Function of electrotonic junctions in embryonic and adult tissues.Fed. Proc. 32:65PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Bennett, M.V.L., Spira, M.E., Pappas, D.G. 1972. Properties of electrotonic junctions between embryonic cells ofFundulus.Dev. Biol. 29:419PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Bluemink, J.G., deLaat, S.W. 1973. New membrane formation during cytokinesis in normal and Cytochalasin-B treated eggs ofXenopus laevis. I. Electron microscope observations.J. Cell Biol. 59:89PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Dawid, I.B. 1965. Deoxyribonucleic acid in amphibian eggs.J. Mol. Biol. 12:581PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. deLaat, S.W., Bluemink, J.G. 1974. New membrane formation during cytokinesis in normal and Cytochalasin-B treated eggs ofXenopus laevis. II. Electrophysiological observations.J. Cell Biol. 60:529PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. deLaat, S.W., Luchtel, D., Bluemink, J.G. 1973. The action of Cytochalasin-B during egg cleavage inXenopus laevis: Dependence on cell membrane permeability.Dev. Biol. 31:163PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. DiCaprio, R.A., French, A.S., Sanders, E.J. 1974. Dynamic properties of electrotonic coupling between cells of earlyXenopus embryos.Biophys. J. 14:387Google Scholar
  9. DiCaprio, R.A., French, A.S., Sanders, E.J. 1975. Intercellular connectivity in the eight-cellXenopus embryo: Correlation of electrical and morphological investigations.Biophys. J. 15:373PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. French, A.S. 1973. Automated spectral analysis of neurophysiological data using intermediate magnetic tape storage.Comput. Programs Biomed. 3:45PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. French, A.S. 1974. Synthesis of low frequency noise for use in biological experiments.IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 21:251PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Furshpan, E.J., Potter, D.D. 1968. Low resistance junctions between cells in embryos and tissue culture.Curr. Top. Dev. Biol. 3:95PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Gilula, N.B., Reeves, O.R., Steinbach, A. 1972. Metabolic coupling, ionic coupling and cell contacts.Nature (London) 235:262Google Scholar
  14. Hamburger, V. 1960. A Manual of Experimental Embryology, University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  15. Ito, S., Hori, N. 1966. Electrical characteristics ofTriturus eggs during cleavage.J. Gen. Physiol. 49:1019PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Ito, S., Loewenstein, W.R. 1969. Ionic communication between early embryonic cells.Dev. Biol. 19:228PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Ito, S., Sato, E., Loewenstein, W.R. 1974a. Studies on the formation of a permeable cell membrane junction. I. Coupling under various conditions of membrane contact. Effects of Colchicine, Cytochalasin-B, Dinitrophenol.J. Membrane Biol. 19:305Google Scholar
  18. Ito, S., Sato, E., Loewenstein, W.R. 1974b. Studies on the formation of a permeable cell membrane junction. II. Evolving junctional conductance and junctional insulation.J. Membrane Biol. 19:339Google Scholar
  19. Kalt, M.R. 1971a. The relationship between cleavage and blastocoel formation inXenopus laevis. I. Light microscope observations.J. Embryol. Exp. Morphol. 26:37PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Kalt, M.R. 1971b. The relationship between cleavage and blastocoel formation inXenopus laevis. II. Electron microscope observations.J. Embryol. Exp. Morphol. 26:51PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Loewenstein, W.R. 1966. Permeability of membrane junctions.Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 137:441PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Loewenstein, W.R. 1968. Communication through cell junctions. Implications in growth control and differentiation.Dev. Biol. 19(Suppl. 2):151Google Scholar
  23. McNutt, N.S., Weinstein, R.S. 1973. Membrane ultrastructure at mammalian intercellular junctions.Prog. Biophys. Mol. Biol. 26:45PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Payton, B.W., Bennett, M.W.L., Pappas, G.D. 1969. Permeability and structure of junctional membranes at an electrotonic synapse.Science 166:1641PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Revel, J.P., Karnovsky, M.J. 1967. Hexagonal array of subunits in intercellular junctions of the mouse heart and liver.J. Cell. Biol. 33:C7PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Sanders, E.J., Zalik, S.E. 1972. The blastomere periphery ofXenopus laevis with special reference to intercellular relationships.Wilhelm Roux' Arch. Entwicklungsmech. Org. 171:181Google Scholar
  27. Selman, G.G., Perry, M.M. 1970. Ultrastructural changes in the surface layers of the newt's egg in relation to the mechanism of its cleavage.J. Cell Sci 6:207PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Sheridan, J.D. 1971. Dye movement and low-resistance junctions between reaggregated embryonic cells.Dev. Biol. 26:627PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Singal, P.K., Sanders, E.J. 1974. An ultrastructural study of the first cleavage ofXenopus embryos.J. Ultrastruct. Res. 47:433PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Slack, C., Warner A.E. 1973. Intracellular and intercellular potentials in the early amphibian embryo.J. Physiol. 232:313PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Woodward, D.J. 1968. Electrical signs of new membrane production during cleavage inRana pipiens eggs.J. Gen. Physiol. 52:509PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag New York Inc. 1976

Authors and Affiliations

  • R. A. DiCaprio
    • 1
  • A. S. French
    • 1
  • E. J. Sanders
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PhysiologyUniversity of AlbertaEdmontonCanada

Personalised recommendations