Skip to main content
Log in

Permeability parameters of the toad isolatedstratum corneum

  • Published:
The Journal of Membrane Biology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

A technique for isolating thestratum corneum from the subjacent layers of the epithelium was developed which permits studying thestratum corneum as an isolated membrane mounted between half-chambers. The method basically consists of an osmotic shock induced by immersing a piece of skin in distilled water at 50°C for 2 min. When the membrane is bathed on each surface by NaCl-Ringer's solution, its electrical resistance is 14.1±1.3 Ω cm2 (n=10). This value is about 1/100 of the whole skin resistance in the presence of the same solution. The hydraulic filtration coefficient (L p ) measured by a hydrostatic pressure method, with identical solutions on each side of the membrane, is 8.8×10−5±1.5×10−5 cm sec−1 atm−1 (n=10) in distilled water and 9.2×10−5±1.4×10−5 cm sec−1 atm−1 (n=10) in NaCl-Ringer's solution. These values are not statistically different and are within the range of 1/80 to 1/120 of the whole skinL p . Thestratum corneum shows an amphoteric character when studied by KCl diffusion potentials at different pH's. The membrane presents an isoelectric pH of 4.6±0.3 (n=10). Above the isoelectric pH the potassium transport number is higher than the chloride transport number; below it, the reverse situation is valid. Divalent cations (Ca++ or Cu++) reduce membrane ionic discrimination when the membrane is negatively charged and are ineffective when the membrane fixed charges are protonated at low pH.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Amberson, W.R. Klein, H. 1928. The influence of pH upon the concentration potentials across the skin of the frog.J. Gen. Physiol. 11:823

    Google Scholar 

  2. Biber, T.U.L., Sanders, M. 1973. Influence of transepithelial potential difference on the sodium uptake at the outer surface of the isolated frog skin.J. Gen. Physiol. 61:529

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Budtz, P.E., Larsen, L.O. 1973. Structure of the toad epidermis during the moulting cycle. I. Light microscopic observations inBufo bufo (L.).Z. Zellforsch. Mikrosk. Ana. 144:353

    Google Scholar 

  4. Eigler, J. 1970. Der Einfluß von Aldosteron auf Natriumtransport und, transepithelialen Wasserfluß durch isolierte Bauchhaut vonRana temporaria.Pfluegers Arch. 317:236

    Google Scholar 

  5. Ewer, R.F. 1951. Water uptake and moulting inBufo regularis Reuss.J. Exp. Biol. 28:369

    Google Scholar 

  6. Glasstone, S. 1946. Textbook of Physical Chemistry D. van Nostrand Company Inc., Toronto

    Google Scholar 

  7. Gunn, R.B., Curran, P.F. 1971. Membrane potentials and ion permeability in a cation exchange membrane.Biophys. J. 11:559

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Harned, H.S., Cook, M.A. 1937. The activity and osmotic coefficients of some hydroxidechloride mixtures in aqueous solution.J. Am. Chem. Soc. 59:1890

    Google Scholar 

  9. Harned, H.S., Gancy, A.B. 1958. The activity coefficient of hydrochloric acid in potassium chloride solutions.J. Phys. Chem. 62:627

    Google Scholar 

  10. Jorgensen, C.B. 1949. Permeability of the amphibianskin. II. Effect of moulting of the skin ofAnurans on the permeability to water and electrolytes.Acta Physiol. Scand. 18:171

    Google Scholar 

  11. Katchalsky A., Curran, P.F. 1967. Nonequilibrium Thermodynamics in Biophysics. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts

    Google Scholar 

  12. Lakshminarayanaiah, N. 1969. Transport Phenomena in Membranes. Academic Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  13. Larsen, E.H. 1969. Active and passive sodium transport and chord resistance in the isolated short-circuited toad skin during aldosterone induced slough formation.Gen. Comp. Endocrinol. 13:516 (Abstr.)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Larsen, E.H. 1970. Sodium transport and D.C. resistance in the isolated toad skin in relation to shedding of thestratum corneum.Acta Physiol. Scand. 79:453

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Larsen, E.H. 1971. Effect of aldosterone and oxytocin on the active sodium transport across the isolated toad skin in relation to loosening of thestratum corneum.Gen. Comp. Endocrinol. 17:543

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Larsen, E.H. 1971. The relative contributions of sodium and chloride ions to the conductance of toad skin in relation to shedding of thestratum corneum.Acta Physiol. Scand. 81:254

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Larsen, E.H. 1972. Characteristics of aldosterone stimulated transport in isolated skin of the toadBufo bufo (L.).J. Steroid Biochem. 3:111

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Lindemann, B., Thorns, U. 1967. Fast potential spike of the frog skin generated at the outer surface of the epithelium.Science 158:1473

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. MacInnes, D.A. 1961. The Principles of Electrochemistry. Dover Publications, Inc. New York

    Google Scholar 

  20. MacRobbie, E.A.C., Ussing, H.H. 1961. Osmotic behaviour of the epithelial cells of frog skin.Acta Physiol. Scand. 53:348

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Martinez-Palomo, A., Erlij, D., Bracho, H. 1971. Localization of permeability barriers in the frog skin epithelium.J. Cell Biol. 50:277

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Mudd, S. 1925. Electroendosmosis through mammalian serous membranes. I. The hydrogen ion reversal point with buffers containing polyvalent anions.J. Gen. Physiol. 7:389

    Google Scholar 

  23. Nielsen, R. 1969. The effect of aldosteronein vitro on the active sodium transport and moulting of the frog skin.Acta Physiol. Scand. 77:85

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Nielsen, R., Tomilson, R.W.S. 1970. The effect of amiloride on sodium transport in the normal and moulting frog skin.Acta Physiol. Scand. 79:238

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Nunes, M.A., Lacaz Vieira, F. 1975. Negative potential level in the outer layer of the toad skin.J. Membrane Biol. 24:161

    Google Scholar 

  26. Rawlins, F., Mateu, L., Fragachan, F., Whittembury, G. 1970. Isolated toad skin epithelium: Transport characteristics.Pfluegers Arch. 316:64

    Google Scholar 

  27. Robinson, R.A., Stokes, R.H. 1959. Electrolyte Solutions. Butterworths, London

  28. Scatchard, G. 1953. Ion exchanger electrodes.J. Am. Chem. Soc. 75:2883

    Google Scholar 

  29. Smyth, D.H., Wright, E.M. 1966. Streaming potentials in the rat small intestine.J. Physiol. London 182:591

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Staverman, A.J. 1952. Non-equilibrium thermodynamics of membrane processes.Trans. Faraday Soc. 48:176

    Google Scholar 

  31. Ussing, H.H., Zerahn, K. 1951. Active transport of sodium as the source of electric current in, the short-circuited isolated frog skin.Acta Physiol Scand. 23:110

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Varanda, W. 1975. Alterações de transporte na pele isolada do sapo associadas à substituições do sódio na solução interna por cátions monovalentes. Master Thesis. University of São Paulo, Brazil

    Google Scholar 

  33. Vôute, C.L., Dirix, R., Nielsen, R., Ussing, H.H. 1969. The effect of aldosterone on the isolated frog skin epithelium (R. temporaria.). A morphological study.Exp. Cell Res. 57:448

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Whittembury, G. 1964. Electrical potential profile of the toad skin epithelium.J. Gen. Physiol. 47:795

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Wright, E.M., Diamond, J.M. 1968. Effects of pH and polyvalent cations on the selective permeability of gall-bladder epithelium to monovalent ions.Biochim. Biophys. Acta 163:57

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Vieira, F.L., Nunes, M.A. & Cury, L. Permeability parameters of the toad isolatedstratum corneum . J. Membrain Biol. 27, 251–264 (1976). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01869139

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01869139

Keywords

Navigation