Advertisement

The Journal of Membrane Biology

, Volume 118, Issue 2, pp 179–192 | Cite as

Gap junction formation and functional interaction between neonatal rat cardiocytes in culture: A correlative physiological and ultrastructural study

  • M. B. Rook
  • B. de Jonge
  • H. J. Jongsma
  • M. A. Masson-Pévet
Articles

Summary

The time course of gap junction formation and growth, following contraction synchronization of cardiac myocytes in culture, has been studied in a combined (electro)physiological and ultrastructural study. In cultures of collagenase-dissociated neonatal rat cardiocytes, pairs of spontaneously beating myocytes synchronized their contractions within one beat interval within 2–20 min after they apparently had grown into contact, 45 sec after the first synchronized beat an appreciable junctional region containing several small gap junctions was already present. In the following 30 min, neither the area of individual gap junctions nor their total area increased, 75 min after synchronization both the area of individual gap junctions and their total area had increased by a factor of 10–15 with respect to what was found in the first half hour. In the period between 75 and 300 min again no further increase in gap junctional area was found. In double voltage-clamp experiments, gap junctions between well-coupled cells behaved like ohmic conductors. In poorly coupled cells, in which the number of functional gap-junctional channels was greatly reduced, the remaining channels showed voltage-dependent gating. Their single-channel conductance was 40–50 pS. The electrophysiologically measured junctional conductance agreed well with the conductance calculated from the morphometrically determined gap-junctional area. It is concluded that a rapid initial gap junction formation occurs during the 2–20 min period prior to synchronization by assembly of functional channels from existing channel precursors already present in the cell membranes. It then takes at least another 30 min before the gap-junctional area increases possibly byde novo synthesis or by recruitment from intracellular stores or from nonjunctional membranes, a process completed in the next 45 min.

Key Words

beat-rate synchronization morphometry junctional conductance voltage clamp single-channel conductance 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abney, J.R., Braun, J., Owicki, J.C. 1987. Lateral interactions among membrane proteins—implications for the organization of gap junctions.Biophys. J. 52:441–454Google Scholar
  2. Bennett, M.V.L. 1966. Physiology of electrotonic junctions.Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 137:509–539Google Scholar
  3. Beyer, E.C., Kistler, J., Paul, D.L., Goodenough, D.A. 1989. Antisera directed against connexin43 peptides react with a 43 kD protein localized to gap junctions in myocardium and other tissues.J. Cell Biol. 108:595–605Google Scholar
  4. Burt, J.M., Spray, D.C. 1988. Single-channel events and gating behavior of the cardiac gap junction channel.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 85:3431–3434Google Scholar
  5. Clay, J.R., Shrier, A. 1981. Analysis of subthreshold pacemaker currents in chick embryonic heart cells.J. Physiol. (London) 312:471–490Google Scholar
  6. De Haan, R.L., Hirakow, R. 1972. Synchronization of pulsation rates in isolated cardiac myocytes.Exp. Cell Res. 70:214–220Google Scholar
  7. El Aoumari, A., Fromaget, C., Dupont, E., Reggio, H., Durbec, P., Briand, J.-P., Böller, K., Kreitman, B., Gros, D. 1990. Conservation of a cytoplasmic carboxy-terminal domain of connexin 43, a gap junctional protein, in mammal heart and brain.J. Membrane Biol. 115:229–240Google Scholar
  8. Flagg-Newton, J.L., Dahl, G., Loewenstein, W.R. 1981. Cell junction and cyclic AMP: I. Upregulation of junctional membrane permeability and junctional membrane particles by administration of cyclic nucleotide or phosphodiesterase inhibitor.J. Membrane Biol. 63:105–121Google Scholar
  9. Gros, D., Mocquard, J.P., Challice, C.E., Schrevel, J. 1978. Formation and growth of gap junctions in mouse myocardium during ontogenesis: A freeze-cleave study.J. Cell Sci. 30:45–61Google Scholar
  10. Gros, D., Mocquard, J.P., Challice, C.E., Schrevel, J. 1979. Formation and growth of gap junctions in mouse myocardium during ontogenesis: Quantitative data and their implications on the development of intercellular communication.J. Molec. Cell. Cardiol. 11:543–554Google Scholar
  11. Hamill, O.P., Marty, A., Neher, E., Sackmann, B., Sigworth, F.J. 1981. Improved patch-clamp techniques for high-resolution current recording from cells and cell-free membrane patches.Pfluegers Arch. 391:85–100Google Scholar
  12. Hille, B. 1984. Ionic Channels of Excitable Membranes. p. 184. Sinauer, Sunderland, MAGoogle Scholar
  13. Johnson, R.G., Hammer, M., Sheridan, J., Revel, J.P. 1974. Gap junctions between reaggregated Novikoff hepatoma cells.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 71:4536–4540Google Scholar
  14. Jongsma, H.J., Masson-Pévet, M., Tjernina, L. 1987. The development of beat-rate synchronization of rat myocyte pairs in cell culture.Basic Res. Cardiol. 82:454–464Google Scholar
  15. Jongsma, H.J., Wilders, R., Van Ginneken, A.C.G., Rook, M.B. 1990. Modulatory effect of the transcellular electrical field on gap-junction conductance.In: Biophysics of Gap Junctions. C. Peracchia, editor. CRC, Boca Raton (in press)Google Scholar
  16. Loewenstein, W.R., 1981. Junctional intercellular communication: The cell-to-cell membrane channel.Physiol. Rev. 61:829–913Google Scholar
  17. Manjunath, C.K., Page, E. 1985. Cell biology and protein composition of cardiac gap junctions.Am. J. Physiol. 17:H783-H791Google Scholar
  18. Masson-Pévet, M. 1979. The fine structure of cardiac pacemaker cells in the sinus node and in tissue culture. Ph.D. Thesis. University of Amsterdam. Rodopi, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  19. Masson-Pévet, M., Jongsma, H.J., De Bruijne, J. 1976. Collagenase-and trypsin-dissociated heart cells: A comparative ultrastructural study.J. Mol. Cell. Cardiol. 8:747–757Google Scholar
  20. Neyton, J., Trautmann, A. 1985. Single-channel currents of an intercellular junction.Nature (London) 317:331–335Google Scholar
  21. Payet, M.D., Rousseau, E., Sauvé, R. 1985. Single-channel analysis of a potassium inward rectifier in myocytes of newborn rat heart.J. Membrane Biol. 86:79–88Google Scholar
  22. Radu, A., Dahl, G., Loewenstein, W.R. 1982. Hormonal regulation of cell junction permeability: Upregulation by catecholamine and prostaglandin E1.J. Membrane Biol. 70:239–251Google Scholar
  23. Rook, M.B., Jongsma, H.J., Van Ginneken, A.C.G. 1988. Properties of single gap junctional channels between isolated neonatal rat heart cells.Am. J. Physiol. 255:H770-H782Google Scholar
  24. Rüdisüli, A., Weingart, R. 1989. Electrical properties of gap junction channels in guinea-pig ventricular cell pairs revealed by exposure to heptanol.Pfluegers Arch. 415:12–21Google Scholar
  25. Shibata, Y., Nakata, K., Page, E. 1980. Ultrastructural changes during development of gap junctions in rabbit left ventricular myocardial cells.J. Ultrastruct. Res. 71:258–271Google Scholar
  26. Small, J.V. 1968. Measurements of section thickness.In: Proceedings 4th European Congress on Electron Microscopy. D.S. Bociarelli editor. Vol. 1, pp. 609–610. Tipografia Poliglotta Vaticana, RomeGoogle Scholar
  27. Tadvalkar, G., Pinto da Silva, P. 1983. In vitro, rapid assembly of gap junctions is induced by cytoskeleton disruptors.J. Cell Biol. 96:1279–1287Google Scholar
  28. Veenstra, R.D. 1990. Developmental changes in voltage-sensitivity of gap junctional conductance.Biophys. J. 57:244a (abstr.)Google Scholar
  29. Veenstra, R.D. De Haan, R.L. 1986. Electrotonic interactions between aggregates of chick embryo cardiac pacemaker cells.Am. J. Physiol. 250:H453-H463Google Scholar
  30. Watanabe, A., Grundfest, H. 1961. Impulse propagation at the septal and commissural junctions of crayfish lateral giant axons.J. Gen. Physiol. 45:267–308Google Scholar
  31. Weingart, R. 1986. Electrical properties of the nexal membrane studied in rat ventricular cell pairs.J. Physiol. (London) 370:267–284Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag New York Inc. 1990

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. B. Rook
    • 1
  • B. de Jonge
    • 1
  • H. J. Jongsma
    • 1
  • M. A. Masson-Pévet
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Physiology, A.M.C.University of AmsterdamAmsterdamThe Netherlands
  2. 2.CNRS URA1332, Laboratoire de ZoologieUniversité Louis PasteurStrasbourgFrance

Personalised recommendations