Skip to main content
Log in

Making decisions about environmental management when conventional economic analysis cannot be used

  • Profile
  • Published:
Environmental Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A process is described for making comparative valuations of a wide range of environmental management activities when the combined social, economic, managerial, and political benefits of some (but not all) of these activities cannot be adequately described in economic terms and when budgetary constraints do not permit funding of all activities under consideration. The process accounts for subjective judgment and contains a formal rigorous decision strategy that takes the place of intuition when quantitative and qualitative values of environmental activities need to be evaluated.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature cited

  • Armstrong, A. A. 1987. Decisions by design.Information World December:24–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bock, R. D., and L. V. Jones. 1968. The measurement and prediction of judgment and choice. Holden-Day, San Francisco. 370 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, J. B. 1987. Assessing subjective preferences for future fire research. Pages 121–127in Proceedings of Wildland Fire 2000. USDA Forest Service General Technical Report PSW-101, Berkeley, California.

  • Davis, J. B., and E. L. Shafer. 1984. The use of paired comparison techniques for evaluating forest research. Pages 4–8in Proceedings of Society of American Foresters, Portland, Oregon.

  • Iacocca, L. 1984. Iacocca, an autobiography. Bantam Books, New York. 352 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harker, P. T., and L. G. Vargas. 1987. The theory of ratio scale estimation: Saaty's analytic hierarchy process.Management Science 33:1383–1403.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, C. M. 1988. Utility functions for infinite-period planning.Management Science 34:645–665.

    Google Scholar 

  • Janis, I. L. 1983. Groupthink: psychological studies of policy decisions and fiascoes. Houghton Mifflin, Boston. 316 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keren, G. B., and J. G. W. Raaijmakers. 1988. On betweensubjects versus within subjects comparison in testing utility theory.Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 41:233–247.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCormack, M. H. 1984. What they don't teach you at Harvard Business School. Bantam Books, New York. 256 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Agricultural Research and Extension Users Advisory Board. 1983. Appraisal of the proposed budget for food and agricultural sciences. US Department of Agriculture, Washington, DC. 347 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Agricultural Research and Extension Users Advisory Board. 1984. New directions for science, education, and agriculture: Executive summary. US Department of Agriculture AGR 101, Washington, DC. 52 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ono, K., and J. H. Davis. 1988. Individual judgment and group interactions: A variable perspective approach.Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 41:211–232.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peters, T. 1988. Thriving on chaos. Alfred A. Knopf, New York. 561 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peters, T., and N. Austin. 1985. A passion for excellence. Random House, New York. 437 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saaty, T. L. 1980. The analytical hierarchy process. McGraw-Hill, New York. 287 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shafer, E. L., and J. B. Davis. 1988. Using priced and unpriced values to make environmental decisions. Pages 138–144in Proceedings of the 1988 Symposium on Systems Analysis in Forest Resources. USDA Forest Service General Technical Report RM-161, Fort Colins, Colorado.

  • Shafer, E. L., and J. Mietz. 1969. Aesthetic and emotional experience rate high with Northwest wilderness hikers.Environment and Behavior 1:187–197.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shafer, E. L., G. M. Moeller, and R. E. Getty. 1977. Future recreation environments. USDA Forest Service FS-316, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinden, J. A., and A. C. Worrell. 1979. Unpriced values—decision without market prices. John Wiley & Sons, New York. 511 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stillwell, W. G., D. Von Winterfeldt, and R. S. John. 1987. Comparing hierarchical and nonhierarchal weighting methods for eliciting multiatribute value models.Management Science 33:442–4503.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, M. G., E. P. Odum, R. Costanza, and T. M. Springer. 1988. Market and nonmarket values of the Georgia landscape.Environmental Management 12:209–217.

    Google Scholar 

  • USDA Forest Service. 1981. Criteria for deciding about forestry research programs. General Technical Report WO-29, Washington, DC. 347 pp.

  • USDA Forest Service. 1983. Draft environmental impact statement: 1985–2030 Resources Planning Act Program Staff Report. Washington, DC. 52 pp.

  • Viscusi, W. K. 1988. Irreversible environmental investments with uncertain benefit levels.Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 15:147–157.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Shafer, E.L., Davis, J.B. Making decisions about environmental management when conventional economic analysis cannot be used. Environmental Management 13, 189–197 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01868365

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01868365

Key words

Navigation