Advertisement

The Journal of Membrane Biology

, Volume 13, Issue 1, pp 37–60 | Cite as

Properties of membrane stationary states

I. The microcanonical membranes
  • Michael E. Starzak
Article

Summary

The flux of permeant species through a membrane is examined using discrete state stochastic models for the transport process within the membrane. While a membrane flux is maintained due to a concentration gradient between bathing solutions, the distribution of species within the membrane evolves to a time invariant configuration which can differ significantly from the equilibrium configuration. Some special properties of these stationary states are examined using linear, microcanonical models for the membrane transport process. Analysis of these models reveals properties which are masked by the phenomenological analysis of irreversible thermodynamics. For example, the models can be used to study the nature of multi-state relaxation within the membrane by observation of the time dependence of the net membrane flux when the membrane is perturbed from its stationary state distribution. Under some conditions, multi-state models will produce relaxation similar to that observed for single-state processes. The symmetry within the membrane is a critical factor for monitoring relaxation processes within the membrane. Because of the stationary nature of the membrane configuration, statistical thermodynamic variables can be defined for the membrane configuration. The total system is not in equilibrium since the baths must still be described by dissipation functions. In the stationary state, the configurational entropy of the membrane is lowered relative to equilibrium and is shown to depend quadratically on the time independent parameter (j/p) wherej is the membrane flux andp is a characteristic transition probability for intra-membrane transitions. The basic membrane system serves as a quantitative example of the entropy reduction possible in a stationary state system. An allosteric transition mediated by the stationary state configuration is examined as a means of utilizing this negentropy production.

Keywords

Stationary State Allosteric Transition Configurational Entropy Invariant Configuration Membrane Flux 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Blumenthal, R., Changeux, J.-P., Lefever, R. 1970. Membrane excitability and dissipative instabilities.J. Membrane Biol. 2:351.Google Scholar
  2. Goldman, D. 1943. Potential, impedance and rectification in membranes.J. Gen. Physiol. 27:37.Google Scholar
  3. Haydon, D. A., Hladky, S. B. 1972. Ion transport across thin lipid membranes: A critical discussion of mechanisms in selected systems.Quart. Rev. Biophys. 5:164.Google Scholar
  4. Heckmann, K., Lindemann, B., Schnakenberg, J. 1972. Current voltage curves of porous membranes in the presence of pore blocking ions. I. Narrow pores containing no more than one moving ion.Biophys. J. 12:683.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Hildebrand, F. 1968. Finite Difference Equations and Simulation. Prentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, N.J.Google Scholar
  6. Hill, T. L., Kedem, O. 1966. Studies in irreversible thermodynamics. III. Models for steady state and active transport across membranes.J. Theoret. Biol. 10:399.Google Scholar
  7. Hille, B. 1971. The permeability of sodium channels to organic cations in myelinated nerve.J. Gen. Physiol. 58:599.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Hladky, S. B., Harris, J. D. 1967. An ion displacement membrane model.Biophys. J. 7:537.Google Scholar
  9. Hodgkin, A. L., Huxley, A. F. 1952. A quantitative description of membrane current and its applications to conductance and excitability in nerve.J. Physiol. 117:500.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Hodgkin, A. L., Keynes, R. 1955. The potassium permeability of a giant nerve fiber.J. Physiol. 128:61.Google Scholar
  11. Macey, R. I., Oliver, R. M. 1967. The time dependence of single file diffusion.Biophys. J. 7:545.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Mazur, P., deGroot, S. R. 1962. Non Equilibrium Thermodynamics. North Holland Publishing Company, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  13. Morowitz, H. J. 1968. Energy Flow in Biology. Academic Press Inc., New York.Google Scholar
  14. Parlin, R. B., Eyring, H. 1954. Membrane permeability and electrical potential.In: Ion Transport across Membranes. H. T. Clarke, editor. p. 103. Academic Press Inc., New York.Google Scholar
  15. Prater, C. D., Wei, J. 1962. Analysis of complex reactions.In: Advances in Catalysis. Vol. 13, p. 204. Academic Press Inc., New York.Google Scholar
  16. Staff, P. J. 1967. Approximation method for equilibrium distributions in second order chemical reaction kinetios.J. Chem. Phys. 46:2209.Google Scholar
  17. Vol'kenshtein, M. V. 1969. Enzyme Physics. Plenum Press, New York.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag New York Inc 1973

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michael E. Starzak
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of ChemistryState University of New York at BinghamtonBinghamton

Personalised recommendations