Abstract
The proposed restoration of an abandoned hydroelectric dam on the Quinebaug River, Connecticut, is studied using energy analysis. The analysis considers the effects of alternative minimum flow releases, ranging from 0 to 34 cubic meters per second (cms), on the total energy flow of the affected system. The principal system components affected by differing minimum flows are hydroelectric power generation, aquatic habitat, and gross aquatic ecosystem productivity.
The minimum flow alternative resulting in the highest annual energy flow in the affected system is considered optimal. From this purely analytical point of view, the optimum minimum flow is 0 cms, due to the short length and low productivity of the regulated reach, and the lack of floodplain interactions.
Simulations of longer and more productive river reaches were conducted. For very short, unproductive reaches, in the absence of a floodplain, the contribution of aquatic community productivity to total system energy flow is negligible compared to hydroelectric generation. Optimum minimum flows are higher for longer and more productive reaches. For such cases the operation of hydroelectric dams could reduce total system energy flow because the energy supplied by hydroelectric generation may be offset by losses in aquatic productivity due to diminished riverine habitat.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Literature cited
Bayley, S. E., H. T. Odum, and W. M. Kemp. 1976. Energy evaluation and management alternatives for Florida's East Coast. Pages 87–104in Trans. 41st North American Wildlife and Natural Resources Conference.
Evans, E. D. 1979. Estimating stream macrobenthos benefits from low flow augmentation. Pages 491–495in The mitigation symposium: a national workshop on mitigating losses of fish and wildlife habitats. US Forest Service, Fort Collins, CO. Gen. Tech. Rep. RM-65.
Huer, J. H. 1975. An evaluation of the Thames River Watershed, Connecticut, using estimates of community metabolism.In R. L. Hames (ed.), An evaluation of the fishery resources of the Thames River Watershed, Connecticut. Bull. 435. University of Connecticut, Storrs.
McKellar, H., M. Homer, L. Pearlstine, and W. Kitchens. 1981. Preliminary analysis of energy flow impacts of a river rediversion. Pages 315–326in M. J. Mitsch, R. W. Bosserman, and J. M. Klopatek (eds.), Energy and ecological modelling. Elsevier, New York.
Odum, H. T. 1956. Primary production in flowing waters.Limnol. Oceanogr. 1:102–117.
Odum, H. T. 1971. Environment, power, and society. John Wiley and Sons, New York. 331 pp.
Odum, H. T. 1978. Energy analysis energy quality and environment. Pages 75–87in M. W. Gilliland (ed.), Energy analysis: a new public policy tool. Westview Press, Boulder, CO.
Odum, H. T., and E. C. Odum. 1976. Energy basis for man and nature. McGraw-Hill, New York. 296 pp.
Tribus, M., and E. C. McIrvine. 1971. Energy and information.Sci. Am. 224:179–190.
US Army Corps of Engineers. 1976. Design memorandum no. 9: intake and tailrace canals. The Cooper River Rediversion Project. Charleston District, Charleston, SC.
US Environmental Protection Agency. 1976. National eutrophication survey, Connecticut. Washington, DC.
US Geological Survey. 1979. Water resources data for Connecticut. CT-79-1. Washington, DC.
US Geological Survey. 1980. Water resources data for Connecticut. CT-80-1. Washington, DC.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Williams, J.B., McKellar, H.N. Determination of optimum minimum flow from a dam by using energy analysis. Environmental Management 8, 345–352 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01868033
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01868033