Impact of human trampling in different zones of a coral reef flat
- 340 Downloads
The effects of trampling on the coral communities of the outer reef flat and reef crest were investigated at Heron Island at the southern end of the Great Barrier Reef. Eighteen months of trampling at various intensities increased the percentage cover of unoccupied substrate and the cover of mobile rubble. The morphology of the coral was the most important feature relating to trampling resistance. Branching corals were reduced on the outer reef flat, and most broken branches were recorded in the initial phases of the experiment. The reef crest was much more resistant.
A short-term trampling experiment showed that trampling detached a greater mass and larger fragments of coral on the outer reef flat than on the reef crest. Further trampling reduced the sizes of the detached fragments on the outer reef flat. A drift experiment indicated that greatest movement of fragments occurred on the reef crest and here the largest fragments moved greater distances.
We concluded that all habitats would be changed by reef walking and that by one measure the outer reef flat was 16 times more vulnerable than the reef crest. The routes taken by reef walkers need to be chosen in relation to the trampling resistance of the habitat.
Key wordsTrampling Coral Reef zones Tourist management Morphology
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Bottjer, D. J. 1980. Branching morphology of the reef coralAcropora cervicornis in different hydraulic regimes.Journal of Paleobiology 54:1102–1107.Google Scholar
- Chamberlain, J. A., Jr. 1978. Mechanical properties of coral skeleton: Compressive strength and its adaptive significance.Paleobiology 4:419–435.Google Scholar
- Endean, R. 1976. Destruction and recovery of coral reef communities. Pages 215–254in O. A. Jones and R. Endean (eds.), Biology and geology of coral reefs, Vol. 3. Academic Press, London.Google Scholar
- Graus, R. R., J. A. Chamberlain, and A. M. Boker. 1977. Structural modification of corals in relation to waves and currents. Pages 135–153in S. H. Frost, M. P. Weiss, and J. B. Saunders (eds.), Studies in Geology, 4, Reefs and related carbonates—ecology and sedimentology. American Association of Petrology and Geology.Google Scholar
- Kay, A. M., and M. J. Liddle. 1984. Tourist impact on reef corals, 1984. Report to Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority.Google Scholar
- Kuss, F. R. 1986. A review of major factors influencing plant responses to recreation impacts.Environmental Management 10:637–650.Google Scholar
- Liddle, M. J. 1975. A selective review of the ecological effects of human trampling on natural ecosystems.Biological Conservation 7:17–36.Google Scholar
- Liddle, M. J. 1988. Recreation and the environment: The ecology of recreation impacts. Section 2, Vegetation and wear. Division of Australian Environmental Studies, Griffith University Brisbane. Working Paper 1/88.Google Scholar
- Liddle, M. J., and A. M. Kay. 1987. Resistance survival and recovery of trampled corals on the Great Barrier Reef.Biological Conservation 42:1–18.Google Scholar
- Stoddart, D. R. 1969. The ecology and morphology of recent coral reefs.Biological Review 44:433–498.Google Scholar
- Wall, G., and C. Wright. 1977. The environmental impact of outdoor recreation. Department of Geography, University of Waterloo, Ontario Publication Series No. 11.Google Scholar
- Winer, B. J. 1971. Statistical principles in experimental design. McGraw-Hill, New York.Google Scholar
- Woodland, D. J., and J. N. A. Hooper. 1977. The effect of human trampling on coral reefs.Biological Conservation 11:1–4.Google Scholar