Skip to main content
Log in

Wildlife management: Managing the hunt versus the hunting experience

  • Research
  • Published:
Environmental Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Deer hunter satisfaction is investigated from two perspectives, (1) satisfaction with the hunt/harvest and (2) satisfaction with the overall hunting trip experience. Regression analysis is used to determine what variables best predict satisfaction with the hunt and the hunting experience. Results indicate that animal population variables (number of deer seen, shot at, bagged) are the best determinants of a quality deer hunt, while environmental (outdoors) and social (crowding and hunter behavior) are the best predictors of a quality hunting trip experience. Wildlife managers and researchers need to realize that deer hunters view the hunt/harvest as different from the hunting trip experience and need to manage for both aspects of hunter satisfaction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature cited

  • Crissey, W. 1971. Some thoughts on wildlife research and management objectives.Wildlife Society News 134:27–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cundy, D. T., R. M. Schreyer, and Richard S. Krannich. 1988. Elements of hunter satisfaction: the Utah experience. Proceedings of the second symposium on social science in resource management. Institute for Environmental Studies, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, Illinois.

    Google Scholar 

  • Decker, D. J., T. L. Brown, and R. J. Gutierrez. 1980. Further insights into the multiple satisfactions approach for hunter management.Wildlife Society Bulletin 8(4):323–331.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dillman, D. A. 1978. Mail and telephone surveys: The total design method. Wiley-Interscience, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heberlein, T. A., J. N. Trent, and R. M. Baumgartner. 1982. The influence of hunter density on firearm deer hunters' satisfaction: A field experiment.Transactions of the 47th North American Wildlife Conference 47:665–676.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hendee, J. C. 1974. A multiple satisfaction approach to game management.Wildlife Society Bulletin 2(3):104–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy, J. 1974. Attitudes and behavior of deer hunters in a Maryland forest.Journal of Wildlife Management 38(1):1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Potter, D. C., J. C. Hendee, and R. N. Clark. 1973. Hunting satisfactions: Game, guns, or nature.Transactions of the 38th North American Wildlife Conference 38:62–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stankey, G., R. Lucas, and R. Ream. Relationships between hunting success and satisfaction.Transactions of the 38th North American Wildlife Conference 38:235–242.

  • Vaske, J. J., M. P. Donnelly, T. A. Heberlein, and B. B. Shelby. 1982. Differences in reported satisfaction ratings by consumptive and nonconsumptive recreationists.Journal of Leisure Research 14(3):195–206.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vaske, J. J., A. J. Fedler, and A. R. Graefe. 1986. Multiple determinants of satisfaction from a specific waterfowl hunting trip.Leisure Sciences 8(2):149–166.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hammitt, W.E., McDonald, C.D. & Noe, F.P. Wildlife management: Managing the hunt versus the hunting experience. Environmental Management 13, 503–507 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01867684

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01867684

Key words

Navigation