Advertisement

Environmental Management

, Volume 11, Issue 4, pp 507–518 | Cite as

Determining regional water quality patterns and their ecological relationships

  • Tim W. Mcdaniel
  • Carolyn T. Hunsaker
  • John J. Beauchamp
Research

Abstract

A multivariate statistical method for analyzing spatial patterns of water quality in Georgia and Kansas was tested using data in the US Environmental Protection Agency's STORET data system. Water quality data for Georgia and Kansas were organized by watersheds. We evaluated three questions: (a) can distinctive regional water quality patterns be detected and predicted using only a few water quality variables, (b) are regional water quality patterns correlated with terrestrial biotic regions, and (c) are regional water quality patterns correlated with fish distributions? Using existing data, this method can distinguish regions with water quality very different from the average conditions (as in Georgia), but it does not discriminate well between regions that do not have diverse water quality conditions (as in Kansas). Data that are spatially and temporally adequate for representing large regions and for multivariate statistical analysis are available for only a few common water quality parameters. Regional climate, lithology, and biotic regimes all have the potential to affect water quality, and terrestrial biotic regions and fish distributions do compare with regional water quality patterns, especially in a state like Georgia, where watershed characteristics are diverse. Thus, identifiable relationships between watershed characteristics and water quality should allow the development of an integrated landaquatic classification system that would be a valuable tool for resource management. Because geographical distributions of species may be limited by Zoogeographic and environmental factors, the recognition of patterns in fish distributions that correlate with regional water quality patterns could influence management strategies and aid regional assessments.

Key words

Water quality Regional ecology Discriminant analysis Landscape ecology Ecoregions Watershed 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature cited

  1. Bailey, R. G. 1978. Description of the ecoregions of the United States. US Forest Service, Ogden, Utah.Google Scholar
  2. Bailey, R. G. 1983. Delineation of ecosystem ecoregions.Environmental Management 7(4):365–373.Google Scholar
  3. Beasley, D. B., E. J. Monke, E. R. Miller, and L. F. Huggins. 1985. Using simulation to assess the impacts of conservation tillage on movements of sediment and phosphorus into Lake Erie.Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 40(2):233–237.Google Scholar
  4. Cross, F. B. 1967. Handbook of fishes of Kansas. Miscellaneous Publication No. 45. University of Kansas Museum of Natural History, Lawrence.Google Scholar
  5. Cross, F. B. 1970. Fishes as indicators of Pleistocene and recent environments in the central Great Plains. Pages 241–257.in W. Dort, Jr., and J. K. Jones, Jr. (eds.), Pleistocene and recent environments of the central Great Plains. Department of Geology, University of Kansas Special Publication No. 3. University Press of Kansas, Lawrence.Google Scholar
  6. Dahlberg, M. D., and D. C. Scott. 1971. The freshwater fish of Georgia.Bulletin of The Georgia Academy of Science 29:1–64.Google Scholar
  7. Hubbs, C. 1957. Distributional patterns of Texas freshwater fishes.The Southwestern Naturalist 2(2–3):89–104.Google Scholar
  8. Lee, D. S., C. R. Gilbert, C. H. Hocutt, R. E. Jenkins, D. E. McAllister, and J. R. Stauffer, Jr. 1980. Atias of North American freshwater fishes. North Carolina Biological Survey Publication #1980-12. North Carolina State Museum of Natural History, Raleigh.Google Scholar
  9. Lotspeich, F. B. 1980. Watersheds as the basic ecosystem: This conceptual framework provides the basis for a natural classification system.Water Resources Bulletin 16(4): 581–586.Google Scholar
  10. Lotspeich, F. B., and W. S. Platt. 1982. An integrated landaquatic classification system.North American Journal of Fisheries Management 2:139–149.Google Scholar
  11. McDaniel, T. M., C. T. Hunsaker, and J. J. Beauchamp. 1986. Identifying regional water quality patterns and their relationships with terrestrial ecosystems and fish distributions. ORNL/TM-9916. Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee.Google Scholar
  12. Miller, R. J., and H. W. Robison. 1973. The fishes of Oklahoma. Oklahoma State University Press, Stillwater.Google Scholar
  13. Nelson, D., G. A. Harris, and T. E. Hamilton. 1978. Land and resource classification—Who cares?Journal of Forestry 76:644–646.Google Scholar
  14. Pflieger, W. L. 1975. The fishes of Missouri. Missouri Department of Conservation, Jefferson City.Google Scholar
  15. Pickering, S. M., Jr., and J. B. Murray. 1976. Geological map of Georgia. Georgia Department of Natural Resources, Geological and Water Resources Division, Georgia Geological Survey.Google Scholar
  16. Ross, H. H. 1963. Stream communities and terrestrial biomes.Archiv f. Hydrobiologie 59(2):235–242.Google Scholar
  17. Rowe, J. S., and J. W. Sheard. 1981. Ecological land classification: A survey approach.Environmental Management 5(5):451–464.Google Scholar
  18. SAS Institute (SAS). 1982. SAS User's Guide: Statistics, 1982 edition. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, North Carolina.Google Scholar
  19. Smith, G. R., and D. R. Fisher. 1970. Factor analysis and distribution patterns of Kansas fishes. Pages 259–277in W. Dort, Jr., and J. K. Jones, Jr. (eds.), Pleistocene and recent environments of the central Great Plains. Department of Geology, University of Kansas Special Publication No. 3. University Press of Kansas, Lawrence.Google Scholar
  20. Soil Conservation Service (SCS). 1981. Land resource regions and major land resource areas of the United States. Agricultural Handbook 296. USDA Soil Conservation Service, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  21. US Department of Commerce (USDC). 1968. Climatic atlas of the United States. Environmental Sciences Services Administration, Environmental Data Service, USDC, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  22. US Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA). 1977. STORET user handbook. US Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Water and Hazardous Materials, Washington, DC.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag New York Inc 1987

Authors and Affiliations

  • Tim W. Mcdaniel
    • 1
  • Carolyn T. Hunsaker
    • 2
  • John J. Beauchamp
    • 3
  1. 1.Regional Air Pollution Control AgencyDaytonUSA
  2. 2.Environmental Sciences DivisionOak Ridge National LaboratoryOak RidgeUSA
  3. 3.Engineering Physics and Mathematics DivisionOak Ridge National LaboratoryOak RidgeUSA

Personalised recommendations