Abstract
Ecological impacts on camp and picnic sites were examined in three National Park Service units along the Delaware and New rivers, in the eastern United States. All sites experienced pronounced impact to trees, groundcover vegetation, and soils. The nature and magnitude of impacts in these riparian forests were quite similar to those reported in wilderness areas in the mountainous western states and northern Minnesota, despite more favorable growing conditions. The relationship between amount of use and amount of impact and the importance of differences in type of use and environment were also roughly comparable. High-use sites were more heavily impacted than low-use sites, but differences were small when compared with differences in amount of use. The areal extent of impact was the major difference between sites in different environments and sites used by different clienteles. This suggests that the effectiveness of basic strategies for managing impact should not differ greatly between regions. Here, as elsewhere, actions taken to control the areal extent of impact appear to be particularly important.
Similar content being viewed by others
Literature cited
Bratton, S. P., M. G. Hickler, and J. H. Graves. 1978. Visitor impact on backcountry campsites in the Great Smoky Mountains.Environmental Management 2:431–442.
Cole, D. N. 1978. Estimating the susceptibility of wildland vegetation to trailside alteration.Journal of Applied Ecology 15:281–286.
Cole, D. N. 1982. Wilderness campsite impacts: effect of amount of use. USDA Forest Service Research Paper INT-284, Ogden, Utah, 34 pp.
Cole, D. N. 1983. Campsite conditions in the Bob Marshall Wilderness, Montana. USDA Forest Service Research Paper INT-312, Ogden, Utah, 18 pp.
Cole, D. N. 1986. Recreational impacts on backcountry campsites in Grand Canyon National Park, Arizona, USA.Environmental Management 10:651–659.
Cole, D. N. 1987. Research on soil and vegetation in wilderness: a state-of-knowledge review. Pages 135–177in R. C. Lucas (comp.), Proceedings, national wilderness research conference: perspectives, state of knowledge, and future directions. USDA Forest Service General Technical Report INT-220, Intermountain Research Station, Ogden, UT.
Cole, D. N., and R. K. Fichtler. 1983. Campsite impact on three western wilderness areas.Environmental Management 7:275–288.
Cole, D. N., and B. Ranz. 1983. Temporary campsite closures in the Selway-Bitterroot Wilderness.Journal of Forestry 81:729–732.
Marion, J. L., and L. C. Merriam. 1985a. Recreational impacts on well-established campsites in the Boundary Waters Canoe Area Wilderness. University of Minnesota Agricultural Experiment Station Bulletin AD-SB-2502, St. Paul, Minnesota, 16 pp.
Marion, J. L., and L. C. Merriam. 1985b. Predictability of recreational impact on soil.Soil Science Society of America Journal 49:751–753.
Merriam, L. C., Jr., C. K. Smith, D. E. Miller, and others. 1973. Newly developed campsites in the Boundary Waters Canoe Area: a study of 5 years' use. University of Minnesota Agricultural Experiment Station Bulletin 511, St. Paul, Minnesota, 27 pp.
Stohlgren, T. J., and D. J. Parsons. 1986. Vegetation and soil recovery in wilderness campsites closed to visitor use.Environmental Management 10:375–380.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Cole, D.N., Marion, J.L. Recreation impacts in some riparian forests of the Eastern United States. Environmental Management 12, 99–107 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01867381
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01867381