Abstract
Overuse of recreation sites seems to justify regulation, and the principal tools for this are fee charging or physical exclusion. Both seem equally costly to administer. Both involve equal costs to consumers if recreationists visit from one origin, but if they come from different origins, costs may be greater and consumers' surplus less under either tool, depending on the shape of the demand curve. Which is the more equitable tool depends on the relative representation of rich and poor participants from near and distant origins. Potentially beneficial use of site revenues is an advantage of charging. Neither availability of substitutes nor variation in daily demand seems likely to change these results substantially, but a system of booking admissions before the trip outset might neutralize the advantages of charging. The optimal level of use varies with the regulatory tool chosen. The optimal admissions under exclusion could be fewer than or more than under charging, or may even be equal to unregulated use.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Literature cited
Brotherton, D. I. 1973. The concept of carrying capacity of countryside recreation areas.Recreation News Supplement 9: 6–11.
Burton, R. C. J. 1974.The Recreational Carrying Capacity of the Countryside. Keele University Library Occasional Publication 11.
Cicchetti, C. J. Some economic issues in planning urban recreation facilities.Land Economics 47: 14–23.
Cicchetti, C. J., and V. K. Smith. 1976.The Costs of Congestion. Ballinger, Cambridge, Mass.
Clawson, M. 1959.Methods of Measuring the Demand for and Value of Outdoor Recreation. Resources for the Future, Inc., Washington, Reprint 10.
Evans, A. W. 1973.The Economics of Residential Location. Macmillan, London.
Fisher, A. C., and J. V. Krutilla. 1972. Determination of optimal capacity of resource-based recreation facilities.In Krutilla, J. V. (ed.),Natural Environments. Resources for the Future, Inc., Washington.
Hendon, W. S. 1973. Property values, schools and park-school combinations.Land Economics 49: 216–18.
Kennedy, J. J. 1972. America's outdoor movement: an adult, white, middleclass subsidy?In Preiser, W. A. (ed.)Environmental Design Perspectives. College of Architecture, Blacksburg, Va.
Knetsch, J. L. 1974.Outdoor Recreation and Water Resources Planning. American Geophysical Union, Washington, Water Resources Monograph 3.
Lewis, R. C., and M. C. Whitby. 1972.Recreation Benefits from a Reservoir. Agricultural Adjustment Unit, University of Newcasde-upon-Tyne, Monograph 2.
McConnell, K. E., and V. A. Duff. 1976. Estimating net benefits of recreation under conditions of excess demand.Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 3: 224–30.
Price, C. 1978.Landscape Economics. Macmillan, London.
Price, C. 1979a. Public preference and the management of recreational congestion.Regional Studies 13: 125–39.
Price, C. 1979b. Interpreting the Clawson demand curve. In Kaiser, F. E. (ed.)IVFRO (P 4.03.00) Meeting Economics of Recreation. USDA Forest Service, Washington.
Price, C. in press. Are extra recreation facilities unproductiveJournal of Environmental Management 11.
Price, C. in prep. Estimating net benefits of recreation under conditions of excess demand: simplification, revision, extension.
Richardson, H. W. 1971.Urban Economics. Penguin, Harmondsworth.
Sinden, J. A., and R. K. Smith. 1975. The analysis and management of forest landscapes: exotics, Eucalypts and solitude.Australian Forestry 38: 183–200.
Smith, R. J. 1971. The evaluation of recreation benefits: the Clawson method in practice.Urban Studies 8: 89–102.
Stankey, G. H. 1972. A strategy for the definition and management of wilderness quality.In Krutilla, J. V. (ed.)Natural Environments. Resources for the Future, Inc., Washington.
Vaux, H. J., and N. A. Williams. 1977. The costs of congestion and wilderness recreation.Environmental Management 1: 495–503.
Veal, A. J. 1973.Perceptual Capacity: a Discussion and some Working Proposals. Centre for Urban and Regional Studies, Birmingham University, Working Paper 1.
Walters, A. A. 1961. The theory and measurement of private and social cost of highway congestion.Econometrica 29: 676–99.
Wetzel, J. N. 1977. Estimating the benefits of recreation under conditions of congestion.Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 4: 239–46.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Price, C. Charging versus exclusion: Choice between recreation management tools. Environmental Management 5, 161–175 (1981). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01867335
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01867335