Skip to main content
Log in

Uncertainties associated with the assessment of vegetation

  • Published:
Environmental Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) attempts to portray the current character of a given ecosystem. This provides a “Baseline” against which future possible changes can be assessed. Ecosystems, however, are dynamic and in a constant state of change. Consequently, data representing a single year reflect conditions only for that year and can be misleading if compared against any other year. In addition to this temporal variation, considerable spacial variation exists in species composition and cover. Ample sampling is required to compensate for this heterogeneity. Variation, or background “noise,” can be minimized by the use of similarity indexes and sampling over a period of at least two years.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature cited

  • Beatley, J. C. 1969. Biomass of desert winter annual populations in northern Nevada.OKOS 20:261–273.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elkington, J. B. 1981. Converting Industry to Environmental impact Assessment.Environ. Conserv. 8:23–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellison, L. 1949. Establishment of vegetation on depleted sub alpine range as influenced by microenvironment.Ecol. Monogr. 19:95–125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gauch, H. G., Jr. 1980. Rapid initial clustering of large data sets.Vegetation 42:103–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gauch, H. G., Jr. 1982. Multivariate analysis in community ecology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. 298 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harner, R. F., and K. T. Harper. 1976. The role of area, heterogeneity, and favorability in plant species diversity of pinyon-juniper ecosystems.Ecology 57:1254–1263.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noy-Mier, I. 1973. Desert ecosystems: environment and producers.Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 4:25–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piemeisel, R. L. 1951. Causes affecting changes and rate of change in a vegetation of annuals in Idaho.Ecology 32:53–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruzicka, M. 1958. Anuendung Mathematisch—Statisticher Methoden in Der Geobotanik (Synthetische Bearbeitung von Aufnahman).Biologia, Bratis L. 13:647–661.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shimwell, D. W. 1971. The description and classification of vegetation. University of Washington Press, Seattle. 322 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shreve, F. 1929. Changes in desert vegetation.Ecology 10:364–373.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sneath, P. H. A., and P. R. Sokal. 1973. Numerical taxonomy: the principals and practice. W. N. Freeman, San Francisco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snedecor, G. W., and W. G. Cochran. 1973. Statistical methods, 6th edn. Iowa State University Press, Ames. 593 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suter, G. W., II. 1981. Ecosystem theory and NEPA assessment. Pages 186–191in Publication 1788. Environmental Science Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN.

    Google Scholar 

  • Terborgh, L. 1973. On the notion of favorableness in plant ecology.Am. Nature 107:481–501.

    Google Scholar 

  • Treshow, M., and J. Allan. 1979. Annual variation in the dynamics of a woodland plant community.Environ. Conserv. 6:231–236.

    Google Scholar 

  • Treshow, M., and J. Allan. 1981. A multivariate approach to comparing annual variation in plant communities.In Proceedings of the 13th International Botanical Congress, Sydney, Australia, 21–28 August 1981.

  • Tueller, P. T., C. D. Beeson, R. J. Tausch, N. E. West, and K. H. Rea. 1979. Pinyon-juniper woodlands of the Great Basin: distribution, flora, vegetal cover. USDA Forest Service research paper INT-229. US Forest Service, Ogden, UT. 23 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wells, P. V. 1960. Physiognomic integration of vegetation of the Pine Valley Mountains in southwestern Utah.Ecology 41:553–556.

    Google Scholar 

  • West, N. E. 1969. Tree patterns in central Oregon ponderosa pine forests.Am. Midl. Naturalist 81:584–590.

    Google Scholar 

  • West, N. E., K. H. Rea, and R. J. Tausch. 1975. Basic synecological relationships in juniper-pinyon woodlands. Pages 41–53in G. F. Gifford and F. E. Busby (eds.), The pinyon-juniper ecosystem: a symposium. Utah State University, Logan. Utah Agric. Exp. Sta. Logan. 194 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whittaker, R. H. 1972. Evolution and measurement of species diversity.Taxon 21:213–251.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whittaker, R. H. 1975. Communities and ecosystems, 2nd edn. Macmillan, New York. 385 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiens, J. A. 1976. Population responses to patchy environments.Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 7:81–120.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Treshow, M., Allan, J. Uncertainties associated with the assessment of vegetation. Environmental Management 9, 471–477 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01867321

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01867321

Key words

Navigation