Abstract
The formulation and implementation of new fire policies in the national forests depend upon public acceptance. A national survey of organized groups of forest users indicates that, contrary to the concern of many forest managers, considerable support exists for flexible fire suppression policies. Forest users are also willing to accept the risk associated with the manager's use of prescribed fire. However, important intergroup differences do exist. Such variation is discussed in relation to a number of socioeconomic variables, general fire knowledge, specific knowledge about the effects of low-intensity fires, and risk preference levels.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Literature cited
Blattenberger, G., W. F. Hyde, and T. J. Mills. 1983. Displaying risk in fire management decisionmaking: techniques and criteria. USDA Forest Service, Pacific SW Experiment Station, Riverside, CA, draft.
Bonnicksen, T. M., and R. G. Lee. 1979. Persistence of the fire exclusion policy in southern California: a biosocial interpretation.Journal of Environmental Management 8:277–293.
Cortner, H. J., M. J. Zwolinski, E. H. Carpenter, and J. G. Taylor. 1984. Public support for fire management policies.Journal of Forestry 82:359–361.
Davis, J. B. 1979. A new fire management policy on Forest Service lands.Fire Technology 15:43–50.
Folkman, W. S. 1973. Butte County, California residents: their knowledge and attitudes about forest fires reassessed. USDA Forest Service research note PSW-297, Berkeley, CA. 5 pp.
Folkman, W. S. 1975. Fire prevention in Butte County, California: evaluation of an experimental program. USDA Forest Service research paper PSW-98, Berkeley, CA. 23 pp.
Folkman, W. S. 1979. Urban users of wildland areas as forest fire risk. USDA Forest Service research paper PSW-137, Berkeley, CA. 22 pp.
Gale, R. D. 1977. Evaluation of fire management activities on the national forests. Policy analysis staff report, USDA Forest Service, Washington, DC. 127 pp.
Hall, D. A. 1972. Public attitudes toward fire. Pages 57–63in Proceedings of the symposium on fire in the environment. USDA Forest Service, report 276, Denver CO.
Hendee, J. C., W. R. Catton, Jr., L. D. Marlow and C. F. Brockman. 1968. Wilderness users in the Pacific Northwest: their characteristics, values and management preferences. USDA Forest Service research paper PSW-61, Portland, OR. 92 pp.
Nelson, T. C. 1979. Fire management policy in the national forests: a new era.Journal of Forestry 77:723–725.
Rauw, D. M. 1980. Interpreting the natural role of fire: implications for fire management policy. Pages 228–233in Proceedings of the 6th conference on fire and forest meteorology. Society of American Foresters, Washington, DC.
Schweitzer, D. L., W. V. Andersen, and T. J. Mills. 1982. Economic efficiency of fire management programs at six national forests. USDA Forest Service research paper PSW-157, Berkeley, CA. 29 pp.
Stankey, G. H. 1976. Wilderness fire policy: an investigation of visitor knowledge and beliefs. USDA Forest Service research paper INT-180, Ogden, UT. 17 pp.
Taylor, J. G., and T. C. Daniel. 1982. Scenic and recreational perceptions of forest burn areas and the effects of fire information on public knowledge and attitudes. School of Renewable Natural Resources, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ. 158 pp.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gardner, P.D., Cortner, H.J., Widaman, K.F. et al. Forest-user attitudes toward alternative fire management policies. Environmental Management 9, 303–311 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01867302
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01867302