Skip to main content
Log in

Natural environmental impact assessment: A rational approach

  • Research
  • Published:
Environmental Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A method is presented which combines environmental indices and estimates of inputs from various land uses to aid in environmental impact assessments. Unweighted pair/group cluster analyses are used to obtain relationships between easily observable environmental indices, such as vegetation types, soils, and geology, based on their mutual recurrence. These relationships are shown by using an ordination technique which shows the nature of complex impacts on a natural system. Results are used to develop anenvironmental effects sequence diagram based on known scientific and engineering principles and observed natural relationships. The diagram may be used in conjunction with land use data to estimate the possible magnitude of impacts on the pre-existing system which may result from such land use. Several examples are developed which quantify inputs from various land uses and which compare them with environmental inputs including point source and non-point source liquid and atmospheric emmissions, land modifications, and resource consumption. Known average values are used and a separate comparison is made in describing the vast differences between the project phases of construction versus longterm operation. A hypothetical environmental impact assessment is given for a small residential development in Chambers County, Texas, U.S. of A.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature cited

  • Anderberg, M.R. 1973. Cluster analysis for applications. Academic Press, New York. 359 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ball, G.H. and D.J. Hall. 1967. Comparison of some cluster-seeking techniques. Interim report no. RADC-TR-66-514, Stanford Research Institute, Menlo Park, California. 46 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bray, R.R., and J.T. Curtis. 1959. Ordination of the upland forest communities of Southern Wisconsin. Ecological Monographs. 27:325–349.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chayes, Felix. 1960. On correlation of variables of constant sum. J. Geophysical Research. 65:4185–4193.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dee, Norbert. 1973. Planning a methodology for water quality management. Environmental Evaluation System, Batelle Memorial Institute, Columbus, Ohio.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feldhausen, P.H. 1971. Ordination of sediments from Cape Hatteras continental margin. Mathematical Geology. 2:113–129.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gevirtz, J.L., R.A. Park, and G.M. Friedman. 1971. Paraecology of benthonic Foraminifera and associated microorganisms of the continental shelf off Long Island, New York. Journal of Paleontology. 45:153–177.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hopkins, L.D. 1973. Environmental impact statements: handbook for writers and reviewers. University of Illinois. 202 pp.

  • Krauskopf, T.M., and D.C. Bunde. 1972. Evaluation of environmental impact through a computer modelling process. Pages 107–125in R. Ditton and T. Goodale, eds. Environmental impact analysis: philosophy and methods. University of Wisconsin Sea Grant Program, Madison, Wisconsin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leopold, L.B. 1971. A procedure for evaluating environmental impact. U.S. Geological Survey Circular. 645. 13 pp.

  • Linsley, R.L., and J.B. Franzini. 1972. Water resources engineering. 2nd ed. McGraw-Hill Book Co., New York. 355 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • McHarg, Ian. 1968. A comprehensive highway route-selection method. Highway Research Record. 246:1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1969. Design with nature. Natural History Press, New York. 198 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowe, P.G., and A. de L. Fajardo, 1973. LUFSAT-Land Use feasibility study analysis technique, DMG-DRS Journal. 7(1):41–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowe, P.G., J.L. Gevirtz, and P.A. Harcombe. 1976. An approach for describing natural systems and for assessing natural environmental impacts. Rice Center for Community Design and Research. Houston, Texas. 123 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sneath, P.H.A., and R.R. Sokal. 1973. Numerical taxonomy. W.H. Freeman and Co., San Francisco, California. 573 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sokal, R.R., and Sneath, P.H.A. 1963. Principles of numerical taxonomy. W.H. Freeman and Co., San Francisco, California. 359 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sorensen, Jens. 1970. A framework for identification and control of resource degradation and conflict in the multiple use of the coastal zone. University of California, Berkeley, California. 31 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ward, W.S., and D.P. Grant. 1971. CASAT: computer assisted space allocation technique. Pages 180–185in M. Kennedy, ed. Proceedings of the Kentucky workshop on computer application to environmental design. College of Architecture, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warner, M.L., and E.H. Preston. 1974. A review of environmental impact assessment methodologies. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C. 27 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winslow, D.E., and W.H. Espey. 1972. Storm water runoff analysis of residential settings for the Woodlands. TRACOR project 077-022-01, document no. T72-AU-9585. 70 pp.

  • Wischmeier, W.H., and D.D. Smith. 1960. A universal soil loss estimating equation to guide conservation farm planning. Transactions of the Seventh International Congress of Soil Science. Vol. 1. p. 418–425.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gevirtz, J.L., Rowe, P.G. Natural environmental impact assessment: A rational approach. Environmental Management 1, 213–226 (1977). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01867285

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01867285

Key Words

Navigation