Abstract
This article deals with wilderness politics in relationship to values and public participation; these terms are defined for the purpose of the study. It is argued that the survival, quantity, and quality of wilderness everywhere will basically be determined by the political and governmental processes through values. Yet there is a strong tendency in these processes to avoid value exposure and emphasis.
Much of governmental approach toward wilderness affairs hinges upon economic development, technoscientific facts, and short-term considerations, in contrast to the intangible noneconomic and long-term values of wilderness. By not articulating nd involving wilderness values more in public participation and the political processes, the public often misses opportunities for influencing far-reaching wilderness decisions. In short, wilderness values need to be more explicitly and implicitly stated and implemented politically.
More study and emphasis need to be given to wilderness values per se. It is necessary to develop more innovative ways of educating the public on wilderness values in terms of their lives and of ensuring that their value inputs are effectively incorporated into public participation and political processes. The last section of this article is devoted to efforts by the author and others to identify and describe wilderness tropical forest values.
Similar content being viewed by others
Literature cited
Clark, W. 1970. The role of the Bureau of Land Management in public conservation education. Paper delivered to the South Dakota section meeting of the Society of Range Management, 23 November 1970. Lemmon, South Dakota, p. 6.
Commoner, B. 1967. Informing the public: the duty of the scientist in the environmental crisis. Paper delivered to the secrecy, privacy and public information symposium annual meeting of the American Association for the Advancement of Science, 29 December 1967. New York, p. 13.
Douglas, I. 1976. Value of the rainforest.Habitat 4:9.
Ehrenfeld, D. W. 1976. The conservation of non-resources.American Scientist 64:651.
Ehrlich, P. 1983. Statement on tropical forests. Rainforest information centre, Lismore, NSW, Australia.
Eidsvik, H. 1978. Involving the public in park planning: Canada.Parks 3:5.
Environmental Protection Agency. 1980. Proposed policy on public participation.Federal Register 45:28916.
Grainger, A. 1980. The state of the world's tropical forests.Ecologist 10:32.
Hendee, J. C., and others. 1979. Page 141in Wilderness management. Forest Service, US Department of Agriculture, Washington, DC, no. 1365.
Henning, D. H. 1979. The politics of wilderness: unique value conflicts.Humanist 39:18.
Henning, D. H. 1982. Training park managers for value consideration in public participation.Park and Recreation 17:61.
Henning, D. H., and A. Utton (eds.) Comments on an interdisciplinary social science approach for environmental administration. Pages 239–248in Interdisciplinary environmental approaches. Educational Media Press, California.
Lenny, D. M. 1976. The case for funding citizen participation in the administrative process.Administrative Law Review Summer:490–493.
Rolston III, H. 1985. Valuing wildlands.Environmental Ethics 7:46.
Sagoff, M. 1985. Fact and value in ecological science.Environmental Ethics 7:111.
Unesco Regional Office for Education in Asia and the Pacific. 1980. Pages 1–20in Environmental education in Asia and the Pacific: report of a regional workshop. Bangkok.
Valentine, P. S. 1980. Tropical rainforest and the wilderness experience: the second world wilderness congress. Cairns, Australia.
Zaslowsky, D. 1984. Managing the dream.Wilderness 48:32–33.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Henning, D.H. Wilderness politics: Public participation and values. Environmental Management 11, 283–293 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01867156
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01867156