Abstract
Legislation mandating the protection of wetlands, combined with current pressures to convert them to other uses, emphasize the need to determine accurately a wetland-upland boundary We investigated six methods designed to establish such a boundary based on vegetation Each method was applied to a common data set obtained from 295 quadrats along 22 transects between marsh and upland areas in 13 intertidal saline wetlands in Oregon and Washington. The multiple occurrence, joint occurrence, and five percent methods required plant species to be classified as salt marsh, upland, and non-indicator, cluster and similarity methods required no initial classification Close agreement on wetland-upland boundaries determined by the six methods suggests that preclassification of plants and collection of plant cover data may not be necessary to determine the boundary
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Literature cited
Batten, A. R., S. Murphy, and D. F. Murray. 1978. Definition of Alaskan wetlands by floristic criteria. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Corvallis, OR. 490 pp.
Boesch, D. F. 1977. Application of numerical classification in ecological investigations of water pollution. Virginia Institute of Marine Science. Special Scientific Report No. 77. 115 pp.
Boon, J. D., D. M. Ware, and G. M. Silberhorn. 1978. Survey of vegetation and elevational relationships within coastal marsh transition zones in the central Atlantic coastal region. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Corvallis, OR. 127 pp.
Clifford, H. T. and W. Stephenson. 1975. An introduction to numerical classification. Academic Press, New York, NY. 229 pp.
Darnell, R. M. 1976. Impacts of construction activities in wetlands of the United States. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Corvallis, OR. EPA-600/3-76-045. 392 pp.
Daubenmire, R. F. 1959. Canopy coverage method of vegetation analysis.Northwest Sci. 33:43–64.
Fager, E. W. 1957. Determination and analysis of recurrent groups.Ecology 38:586–595.
Frenkel, R. E., and H. P. Eilers. 1976. Tidal datums and characteristics of the upper limits of coastal marshes in selected Oregon estuaries. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Corvallis, OR. 93 pp.
Frenkel, R. E., T. Boss, and S. R. Schuller. 1978. Transition zone vegetation between intertidal marsh and upland in Oregon and Washington. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Corvallis, OR. 320 pp.
Harvey, H. T., M. J. Kutilek, and K. M. DiVittorio. 1978. Determination of transition zone limits in coastal California wetlands. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Corvallis, OR. 185 pp.
Jefferson, C. A. 1976. Relationship of vegetation and elevation at upper and lower limits of the transition zone between wetland and upland in Oregon's estuaries. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Corvallis, OR. 92 pp.
Mueller-Dombois, D., and H. Ellenberg. 1974. Aims and methods of vegetation ecology. John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York, NY. 547 pp.
National Ocean Survey (NOAA). 1975. The relationship between the upper limit of control marshes and tidal datums. Rockville, National Ocean U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Corvallis, OR. 84 pp.
Odum, E. P. 1961. The role of tidal marshes in estuarine production.Conservationist 15:12–13.
Teal, J. M. 1962. Energy flow in the salt marsh ecosystem of Georgia.Ecology 43:614–624.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Eilers, H.P., Taylor, A. & Sanville, W. Vegetative delineation of coastal salt marsh boundaries. Environmental Management 7, 443–452 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01867124
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01867124