Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Resource suitability: Methods for analyses

  • Profile
  • Published:
Environmental Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

There is a growing need to develop methods for analyzing resource suitability that are both legally defensible and accurate. Three approaches to suitability analysis are reviewed: the US Soil Conservation Service capability classification and important farmlands mapping; the McHarg, or Pennsylvania, suitability analysis method; and Dutch approaches to suitability analysis. Computer applications and the carrying-capacity concept are briefly reviewed. Three applications of suitability analysis are discussed: examples from Medford Township, New Jersey; Whitman County, Washington; and Abuja, the new federal capital city of Nigeria.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature cited

  • Barnhart, C. L. (ed). 1953. The American college dictionary. Harper and Row, New York, NY. 1432 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartelli, L. J., A. A. Klingebiel, T. V. Baird, and M. R. Huddleston. 1966. Soil surveys and land-use planning. Soil Science Society of America, Madison, WI. 179 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beach, R., D. Benson, D. Brunton, K. Johnson, J. Knowles, J. Michalovic, H. G. Newman, B. Tripp, and C. Wunschel. 1978. Asotin County ecological inventory and land-use suitability analysis. Washington State University, Cooperative Extension Service, Pullman, WA. 356 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beeman, L. E. 1978. Computer-assisted resource management. Pages 375–381in Integrated inventories of renewable natural resources. H. G. Lund, V. LaBau, P. F. Folliot, and D. Robinson (eds). US Forest Service, Tucson, Arizona.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belknap, R. K., and J. G. Furtado, 1967. Three approaches to environmental resource analysis. The Conservation Foundation, Washington, DC. 102 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belknap, R. K. and J. G. Furtado. 1968. Hills, Lewis, McHarg Methods Compared.Landscape Arch. 58(2):146–147.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger, J., A. Johnson, D. Rose, and P. Skaller. 1977. Regional planning notebook (unpublished course guidelines). University of Pennsylvania, Department of Landscape Architecture and Regional Planning, Philadelphia, PA. 132 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bosselman, F., and D. Callies. 1971. The quiet revolution in land-use control. US Government Printing Office, Washington, DC. 327 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bosselman, F., D. Callies, and J. Banta. 1973. The taking issue. US Government Printing Office, Washington, DC. 329 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brady, N. C. 1974. The nature and properties of soils. MacMillan Publishing Co., New York, NY. 639 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brinkman, R., and A. J. Smyth (eds). 1973. Land evaluation for rural purposes (Publication 17). International Institute for Land Reclamation and Improvement, Wageningen, The Netherlands. 116 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Callies, D. L. 1980. The quiet revolution revisited.J. Amer. Plann. Assoc. 46(2):135–144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cannon, T. M., and B. R. Hunt. 1981. Image processing by computer.Sci. Amer. 245(4):214–225.

    Google Scholar 

  • Catton, W. 1982. Social and behavioral aspects of the carrying capacity of natural environments.In Behavior and natural environment (Volume VI of Human Behavior and Environment). I. Altman and J. F. Wohlwill (eds). Plenum Publishing Company, New York, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coombs, D. B., and J. Thie. 1979. The Canadian land inventory system. Pages 909–933in Planning the uses and the management of the land. M. T. Beatty, G. W. Petersen, and L. R. Swindale (eds). American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America and Soil Science Society of America, Madison, WI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coughlin, R. E., and J. C. Keene. 1981. The protection of farmland: A reference guidebook for state and local officials. National Agricultural Lands Study, Washington, DC. 284 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, P. E., N. Lerch, L. Tornes, J. Steiger, N. Smeck, H. Andrus, J. Trimmer, and G. Boltrell. 1976. Soil survey of Montgomery County, Ohio. US Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service, Washington, DC. 107 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dideriksen, R. 1980. SCS important farmlands mapping program. Pages 156–165in Farmlands preservation, The state of the art. F. Steiner and J. Theilacker (eds). Washington State University, Department of Horticulture and Landscape Architecture, Cooperative Extension, and Partnership for Rural Improvement, Pullman, WA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donahue, R., R. W. Miller, and J. C. Schickluna. 1977. Soils: An introduction to soils and plant growth. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ. 626 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunford, R. W., E. D. Roe, F. R. Steiner, and W. R. Wagner. 1982. The agricultural land evaluation and site assessment system: Incorporating economic, locational, and governmental factors into land classifications (paper presented at the Planning Association of Washington Annual Meeting). Washington State University, Pullman, WA. 14 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fabos, J. G., and S. J. Caswell. 1977. Composite landscape assessment (Research Bulletin Number 637). University of Massachusetts, Massachusetts Agricultural Experiment Station, Amherst, MA. 323 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, S. I. and G. E. Gordon. 1981. The accuracy of soil survey information for urban land-use planning.J. Amer. Plann. Assoc. 47(3):301–312.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hills, G. A. 1961. The ecological basis for land-use planning (Research Report No. 46). Ontario Department of Lands and Forests, Toronto, ON. 204 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hopkins, L. D. 1977. Methods for generating land suitability maps: a comparative evaluation.J. Amer. Inst. Plann. 43:386–400.

    Google Scholar 

  • International Planning Associates. 1978. Site evaluation and site selection (Report No. 2. A New Federal Capital for Nigeria). Federal Capital Development Authority, Lagos, Nigeria. 91 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • International Union for the Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources. 1980. World conservation strategy. (Published in Cooperation with the United Nations Environment Programme and The World Wildlife Fund.) Gland, Switzerland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs, P. 1971. Landscape development in the urban fringe. A case study of the site planning process.Town Plann. Rev. 42:342–360.

    Google Scholar 

  • Juneja, N. 1974. Medford. University of Pennsylvania, Department of Landscape Architecture and Regional Planning, Center for Ecological Research in Planning and Design, Philadelphia, PA. 64 pp.

  • Killpack, C. 1981. Computer mapping, spatial analysis, and landscape architecture.Landscape J. 1(1):41–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kowalski, K. T., and K. R. Brooks. 1980. Hierachial land-use suitability modeling for protecting agricultural lands in Whitman County, Washington. Presented before the Council of Educators in Landscape Architecture, August 1980, Madison, WI. 26 pp.

  • Laird, R. T., J. B. Perkins, D. A. Bainbridge, J. B. Baker, R. T. Boyd, D. Huntsman, P. E. Staub, and M. B. Zucker. 1979. Quantitative land-capability analysis (Geological Survey Professional Paper 945). US Government Printing Office, Washington, DC. 115 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Lier, H. N. 1973. Determination of planning capacity and layout criteria of outdoor recreation projects. Centre for Agricultural Publishing and Documentation, Wageningen, The Netherlands. 156 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Lier, H. N. 1980. Outdoor recreation in the Netherlands. II. A system to determine the planning capacity of outdoor recreation projects having varying daily attendance.Landscape Plann. 7:329–343.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Lier, H. and F. Steiner. 1982. A review of the Zuiderzee reclamation works: An example of Dutch physical planning.Landscape Plann. 9:35–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lime, D. W. 1979. Carrying capacity.Trends in Rivers and Trails 16:37–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lime, D. W., and G. H. Stankey. 1971. Carrying capacity: Maintaining outdoor recreation quality. Pages 174–184in Forest recreation symposium proceedings. Northeast Forest Experiment Station, Upper Darby, PA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Litton, R. B. Jr., and R. E. Boder. 1971. Book review ofDesign with nature.J. Amer. Inst. Plan. 37(1):50–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lynch, K. 1971. Site planning. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. 384 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacDougall, E. B. 1975. The accuracy of map overlays.Landscape Plann. 2:23–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • McAllister, D. A. 1980. Evaluation in environmental planning. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. 308 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCormick, D. W. 1974. Soil potentials: A positive approach to urban planning.J. Soil Wat. Conserv. 29:258–262.

    Google Scholar 

  • McHarg, I. L. 1969. Design with nature. Doubleday/The Natural History Press, Garden City, NY. 197 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meester, R., and J. L. M. van der Voet. 1980. Carrying capacity, goal or result of a policy concerning water-based recreation areas. Agricultural University, Department of Land and Water Use, Wageningen, The Netherlands. 6 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyers, C. R., Jr. 1971. Regional modeling abstracts (3 volumes). Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyers, C. R., M. Kennedy, and R. N. Sampson. 1979. Information systems for land-use planning. Pages 889–907in Planning the uses and management of land. M. T. Beatty, G. W. Peterson, and L. D. Swindale (eds). American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science of America, and Soil Science Society of America, Madison, WI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, F. P. 1978. Soil survey under pressure: The Maryland experience.J Soil Water Conserv. 33(3):104–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Transport and Public Works. No date. Room at last. IJsselmeerpolders Development Authority, Lelystad, The Netherlands. 48 pp.

  • Moffett, N. 1978. Nigeria's new federal capital city.West African Technical Review April:109–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nash, R. (ed). 1976. The American environment. Readings in the history of conservation. Addison-Wesley Publishing Co., Reading, MA. 364 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Agricultural Lands Study. 1981. Final report. US Government Printing Office, Washington, DC. 108 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Resources Defense Council, Inc. 1977. Land-use controls in the United States. E. Moss (ed). The Dial Press/James Wade, New York, NY. 362 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nichols, R., and E. Hyman. 1982. Evaluation of environmental assessment methods.J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage. Div. 108(WR1):87–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niesward, G. H., and P. J. Pizor. 1977. Current planning capacity: A practical carrying-capacity approach to land-use planning (Extension Bulletin 413). Rutgers University, Cooperative Extension Service, New Brunswick, NJ. 103 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Banion, K. 1980. Modeling land-use conflicts and constraints for energy development.Environ. Sci. Tech. 14(12):1439–1444.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pacific Northwest River Basins Commission. 1973. Ecology and the economy. Vancouver, WA. 118 pp.

  • Palmer, A. E. 1981. Toward Eden. Creative Resources Systems, Winterville, NC. 417 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfister, P. E., and R. E. Frankel. 1975. The concept of carrying capacity. Its application for management of Oregon's scenic waterway system (Publication No. 32). Water Resources Research Institute, Salem, OR. 155 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reganold, J. P., and M. J. Singer. 1978. Defining prime agricultural land in California (Environmental Quality Series No. 29). University of California, Institute of Government Affairs, Davis, CA. 45 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reganold, J. P., and M. J. Singer. 1979. Defining prime farmland by three land classification systems.J. Soil Water Conserv. 34(4): 172–176.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, M. C., J. C. Randolph, and J. R. Chiesa. 1979. A land suitability model for the evaluation of land-use change.Environ. Manage. 3:339–359.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowe, J. E. 1977. A suitability matrix for selecting land-use alternatives for reclaimed strip mined areas.Landscape Plann. 4:257–271.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, D. M., D. R. Godschalk, and N. Axler. 1978. The carrying capacity concept as a planning tool (PAS Report No. 338). American Planning Association, Chicago, IL. 26 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singer, M. J., K. K. Tanji, and J. H. Snyder. 1979. Planning uses of cultivated cropland and pastureland. Pages 225–27in Planning the uses and management of land. M. T. Beatty, G. W. Petersen, and L. D. Swindale (eds). American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, Soil Science of America, Madison, WI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soil Conservation Service. 1975. National soils handbook. US Department of Agriculture, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soil Survey Staff. 1951, 1975. Soil survey manual (USDA Handbook 18). US Department of Agriculture, Washington, DC. 200 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soil Survey Staff. 1975. Soil taxonomy—A basic system of soil classification for making and interpreting soil surveys (Agricultural Handbook 436). US Department of Agriculture, Washington, DC. 754 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stankey, G. H., and D. W. Lime. 1973. Recreational carrying capacity: An annotated bibliography (General Technical Report INT-3). US Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Ogden, UT. 45 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steiner, F. 1981. Farmland protection in the Netherlands.J. Soil Water Conserv. 36(2):71–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steiner, F., and J. Theilacker. 1978. Whitman Country rural housing feasibility study. Whitman County Regional Planning Council, Colfax, WA. 99 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steiner, F., and J. Theilacker. 1979. Locating feasible areas for rural housing in Whitman County, Washington.J. Soil Water Conserv. 34(6):283–285.

    Google Scholar 

  • United States Congress. 1979. National Forest system land and resource management planning.Fed. Reg. 44(181):53983–53999.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tahoe Regional Planning Agency. 1982. Environmental impact statement for the establishment of environmental threshold carrying capacities. South Lake Tahoe, CA. 140 pp.

  • Vink, A. P. A. 1975. Land use in advancing agriculture. Springer-Verlag, New York, NY. 394 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, J. A. 1974. Recreational carrying capacity reconsidered.J. For. 72(5):274–278.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walters, K., and P. A. Clancy. 1969. Reconnaissance of geology and groundwater occurrence in Whitman County, Washington (Water Supply Bulletin No. 26). Washington Department of Water Resources, Olympia, WA. 169 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitman County Regional Planning Council. 1978. Whitman County comprehensive plan. Colfax, WA. 64 pp.

  • Wright, L. 1981. Agricultural land evaluation and assessment systems: Pilot program (unpublished briefing paper). US Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, L., S. Aradas, R. Darden, S. Pfluger, and W. Zitzmann. 1982. Farmland: Want to protect?Plann. 48(7):20–21.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Horticulture and Landscape Architecture, Washington State University, 99164-6414, Pullman, Washington

    Frederick Steiner

Authors
  1. Frederick Steiner
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Steiner, F. Resource suitability: Methods for analyses. Environmental Management 7, 401–420 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01867120

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01867120

Key words

Search

Navigation