Skip to main content
Log in

Insect pest management in forest ecosystems

  • Research
  • Published:
Environmental Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Understanding the role of insects in forest ecosystems is vital to the development of environmentally and economically sound pest management strategies in forestry Most of the research on forest insects has been confined to phytophagous species associated with economically important tree species The roles of most other insects in forest environments have generally been ignored, including the natural enemies and associates of phytophagous species identified as being important In the past few years several investigations have begun to reevaluate the role of phytophagous species responsible for perturbation in forest ecosystems, and it appears that these species may be playing an important role in the primary productivity of those ecosystems Also, there is an increasing awareness that forest pest managers have been treating the symptoms and not the causes of the problems in the forest Many insect problems are associated with poor sites or sites where trees are growing poorly because of crowding As a result, there is considerable emphasis on the hazard rating of stands of trees for their susceptibility to various phytophagous insects The next step is to manipulate forest stands to make them less susceptible to forest pest complexes A thinning study in California is used as an example and shows that tree mortality in ponderosa pine (Pinus ponderosa) attributable to the western pine beetle (Dendroctonus brevicomis) can be reduced by commercial thinning to reduce stocking

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature cited

  • Amman, G. D. 1977. The role of the mountain pine beetle in lodgepole pine ecosystems: impact on succession. Pages 3–18in W. J. Mattson, ed. The role of arthropods in forest ecosystems. Springer-Verlag, New York, NY. 104 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bess, H. A., S. H. Spurr, and E. W. Littlefield. 1947. Forest site conditions and the gypsy moth. Harvard Forest Bull. 22. 56 pp.

  • Blais, J. R. 1974. The policy of keeping trees alive via spray operations may hasten the recurrence of spruce budworm out-breaks.Forestry Chron. 50:19–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bormann, F. H., and G. E. Likens. 1979. Pattern and process in a forested ecosystem. Springer-Verlag, New York, NY. 253 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, K. G. 1966. Aspects of insect-tree relationships in forests of eastern Australia. Pages 239–250in H. D. Gerhold, F. J. Schreiner, R. E. McDermott, and J. A. Winisski, eds. Breeding pest-resistant trees. Pergamon Press, Oxford. 505 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, R. W., and R. J. Sloan. 1977. Forest stand responses to defoliation by the gypsy moth. Forest Sciences Monograph 19. 34 pp.

  • Cobb, F. W., Sr., D. L. Wood, R. W. Stark, and J. R. Parmeter, Jr. 1968. Photochemical oxidant injury and bark beetle (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) infestation of ponderosa pine. IV. Theory of the relationships between oxidant injury and bark beetle infestation.Hilgardia 39:141–152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferrell, G. T. 1980. Risk-rating systems for mature red fir and white fir in northern California. Forest Service Gen. Tech. Rep. PSW-39. US Department of Agriculture. 29 pp.

  • Fowells, H. A. 1965. Silvics of forest trees of the United States. US Dep. Agr. Hndbk. 271. 762 pp.

  • Goheen, D. J., and F. W. Cobb, Jr. 1980. Infestation ofCerotocystis wagneri infested ponderosa pine by bark beetles (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) in the central Sierra Nevada.Can. Entomol. 112:725–730.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham, S. A. 1956. Forest inserts and the law of natural compensations.Can. Entomol. 88:45–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hedden, R. L., S. J. Barras, and J. E. Coster, technical coordinators. 1981. Hazard-rating systems in forest pest management: Symposium proceedings. Forest Service Gen. Tech. Rep. WO-27. US Department of Agriculture. 169 pp.

  • Houston, D. R. 1979. Classifying forest susceptibility to gypsy moth defoliation. U.S. Dep. Agr. Hndbk. 542. 21 pp.

  • Jennings, D. T., F. B. Knight, S. C. Hacker, and M. E. McKnight. 1979. Spruce budworms bibliography. University of Maine Life Science and Agric. Exp. Sta. Misc. Rep. 213. 687 pp.

  • Knight, F. B., and M. J. Heikkenen. 1980. Principles of forest entomology. 5th ed. McGraw-Hill, New York, NY. 461 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lang, J., R. C. Heald, E. C. Stone, D. L. Dahlsten, and R. Akers. 1978. Silvicultural treatments to reduce losses to bark beetle.Calif. Agr. 32(7):12–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Massey, C. L., and W. D. Wygant. 1954. Biology and control of the Engelmann spruce beetle in Colorado. US Dep. Agr. Circular 944. 35 pp.

  • Mattson, W. J., ed. 1977. The role of arthropods in forest ecosystems. Springer-Verlag, New York, NY. 104 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mattson, W. J., and N. D. Addy. 1975. Phytophagous insects as regulators of forest primary production.Science 190(4214):515–522.

    Google Scholar 

  • McFadden, M. W., D. L. Dahlsten, C. W. Berisford, F. B. Knight, and W. W. Metterhouse. 1981. Integrated pest management in China's forests.J. Forestry 79:723–726.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLoed, J. M. 1980. Forests, disturbances, and insects.Can. Entomol. 112:1185–1192.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, P. C. 1970. Age-distribution of spruce and fir in beetle-killed forests on the White River Plateau, Colorado.Amer. Midland Nat. 83:206–212.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nilson, S. 1976. Rationalization of forest operations gives rise to insect attack and increment losses.Ambio 5(1):17–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rafes, P. M. 1966. Influence of animals upon the productivity of forest biogeocoenoses. Pages 5–68in Izdatel'stro “Nauka.” Academy of Sciences, USSR, Laboratory of Forest Science, Moscow. Canada Dept. of Forestry and Rural Development Translation No. 89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rudinsky, J. A. 1962. Ecology of Scolytidae.Ann. Rev. Entomol. 7:327–348.

    Google Scholar 

  • Safranyik, L., D. M. Shrimpton, and H. S. Whitney. 1974. Management of lodgepole pine to reduce losses from the mountain pine beetle. Environment Canada, Forestry Services, Forestry Technical Report 1. 24 pp.

  • Salman, K. A., and J. W. Bongberg. 1942. Logging high-risk trees to control insects in pine stands of northeastern California.J. Forestry 40:533–539.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sartwell, C., and R. E. Stevens. 1975. Mountain pine beetle in ponderosa pine.J. Forestry 73:136–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmid, J. M., and R. H. Frye. 1976. Stand ratings for spruce beetles. Forest Service Research Note RM-309. US Department of Agriculture. 4 pp.

  • Smith, D. M. 1976. Changes in eastern forests since 1600 and possible effects. Pages 3–20in J. F. Anderson and H. K. Kaya, eds. Perspectives in forest entomology. Academic Press, London. 428 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stoszek, K. J., P. G. Mika, J. A. Moore, and H. L. Osborne. 1981. Relationships of Douglas-fir tussock moth defoliation to site and stand characteristics in northern Idaho.Forest Science 27:431–442.

    Google Scholar 

  • Telford, A. D. 1961. Lodgepole needleminer parasites: biological control and insecticides.J. Econ. Entomol. 54:347–355.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wickman, B. E. 1980. Increased growth of white fir after a Douglasfir tussock moth outbreak.J. Forestry 78:31–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, C. B., Jr., J. M. Wenz, D. L. Dahlsten, and N. X. Norick. 1979. Relation of forest site and stand characteristics to Douglas-fir tussock moth (Lepidoptera: Lymantriidae) outbreaks in California.Bull. Societe Entomologique Suisse 52:297–307.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dahlsten, D.L., Rowney, D.L. Insect pest management in forest ecosystems. Environmental Management 7, 65–72 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01867043

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01867043

Key words

Navigation