Skip to main content
Log in

Project appraisal and planning for overdeveloped countries: I. The costing of nonrenewable resources

  • Research
  • Published:
Environmental Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In cost-benefit analysis, natural resources, like other factors of production, should be costed as a mixture of marginal social cost of exploiting additional resources and lost marginal social benefit of forgone alternative uses, according to the way in which extra resources are made available to a project. For a nonrenewable resource, changes in future marginal social cost and marginal social benefit are likely to add significantly to the immediate elements of cost, as successively less tractable resource stocks are exploited. Of the several reasons given for ignoring these future costs, the most plausible is that technological advance justifies a heavy discount on the future. However, neither historical nor logical arguments demonstrate the inevitability of efficacious technological advance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature cited

  • Baer, R. A., Jr. 1979. Review ofResources for an uncertain future, edited by C.J. Hitch.Natural Resources Journal 19:464–466.

  • Barnett, H. J., and C. Morse. 1963. Scarcity and growth: the economics of natural resource availability. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD. 304 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beckerman, W. 1972. Economists, scientists and environmental catastrophe.Oxford Economic Papers 24:327–344.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beckerman, W. 1974. In defence of economic growth. Jonathan Cape, London. 287 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carr, J. L. 1966. STP versus SOC in investment criteria.Economic Journal 76:933–934.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, C. W. 1973. The economics of over-exploitation.Science 181:630–634.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, C. W. 1976. Mathematical bioeconomics. John Wiley and Sons, New York, NY. 352 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coddington, A. 1973. Professor Beckerman in perspective.Environment and Planning A 5:667–672.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coles, A. S., ed. 1973. Thinking about the future. Sussex University Press, Brighton. 244 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dasgupta, P., and G. Heal. 1974. The optimal depletion of exhaustible resources.Review of Economic Studies Symposium 1974:3–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eckstein, O. 1961. A survey of the theory of public expenditure criteria.In public finances: needs, sources and utilization. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ. pp. 512.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ecologist. 1972. A blueprint for survival. Penguin Books, Harmondsworth. 139 pp.

  • Ehrlich, P. R., A. H. Ehrlich, and J. P. Holdren. 1977. Ecoscience: population, resources, environment, 3rd ed. Freeman, San Francisco, CA. 1051 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feldstein, M. S. 1964a. Net social benefit calculation and the public investment decision.Oxford Economic Papers 16:114–131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feldstein, M. S. 1964b. The STP discount rate in cost-benefit analysis.Economic Journal 74:360–379.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, A. C., and J. V. Krutilla. 1975. Resource conservation, environmental preservation and the rate of discount.Quarterly Journal of Economics 89:358–370.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, A. C., J. V. Krutilla, and C. J. Cicchetti. 1972. The economics of environmental preservation.American Economic Review 62:605–619.

    Google Scholar 

  • Georgescu-Roegen, N. 1971. The entropy law and the economic process. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA. 457 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Georgescu-Roegen, N. 1975. Energy and economic myths.Southern Economic Journal 41:347–381.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, J. R. 1978. Guide to practical project appraisal. United Nations, New York, NY. 128 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardin, G. 1968. The tragedy of the commons.Science 162:1243–1248.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardin, G., and J. Baden, eds. 1977. Managing the commons. Freeman, San Francisco, CA 294 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Irvin, G. 1978. Modern cost-benefit methods. Macmillan, London. 257 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kay, J. A., and J. A. Mirrlees. 1975. The desirability of natural resource depletion.In D. W. Pearce and J. Rose, eds., The economics of natural resource depletion. Macmillan, London. 220 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, C. 1977. ‘Blind alleys and open prospects’ by Colin Price—a comment.Forestry 50:169–175.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lancaster, K. J. 1966. Change and innovation in the technology of consumption.American Economic Review, Papers and Proceedings 56:14–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lasky, S. G. 1950. How tonnage and grade relations help predict ore reserves.Engineering and Mining Journal.

  • Little, I. M. D., and J. A. Mirrlees. 1974. Project appraisal and planning for developing countries. Heinemann, London. 388 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maddox, J. 1972. Raw materials and the price mechanism.Nature 236:331–334.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marglin, S. A. 1963. The social rate of discount and the optimal rate of investment.Quarterly Journal of Economics 77:95–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marglin, S. A. 1967. Public investment criteria. Allen and Unwin, London. 103 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • McInerney, J. 1981. Natural resource economics: the basic analytical principles.In J.A. Butlin, ed., Economics and resources policy. 206 pp.

  • Meadows, D. H., D. L. Meadows, J. Randers, and W. W. Behrens. 1972. The limits to growth. Earth Island, London. 205 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mishan, E. J. 1967. A proposed normalization procedure for public investment criteria.Economic Journal 77:777–796.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mishan, E. J. 1975. Cost-benefit analysis, 2nd ed. Allen and Unwin, London. 454 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nash, C. A. 1973. Future generations and the social rate of discount.Environment and Planning A 5:611–617.

    Google Scholar 

  • Page, T. 1977. Equitable use of the resource base.Environment and Planning A 9:15–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Price, C. 1973. To the future: with indifference or concern?Journal of Agricultural Economics 24:393–398.

    Google Scholar 

  • Price, C. 1976. Some economic aspects of marine mammal management policies: the future and the discount rate.In Proceedings of the Scientific Consultation on the Conservation and Management of Marine Mammals and their Environment. Food and Agriculture Organization, Rome. Unnumbered pages.

    Google Scholar 

  • Price, C. 1978. Landscape economics. Macmillan, London. 168 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Price, C. 1984. Project appraisal and planning for overdeveloped countries: II. Shadow pricing under uncertainty.Environmental Management 8:233–242 (this issue).

    Google Scholar 

  • Puu, T. 1977. On the profitability of exhausting natural resources.Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 4:185–199.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, J. 1971. A theory of justice. Oxford University Press, London. 607 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, A. 1955. Natural resources: The economics of conservation. University of Toronto Press, Toronto. 184 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Self, P. 1976. Econocrats and the policy process. Macmillan, London. 212 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Squire, L., and H. van der Tak. 1975. Economic analysis of projects. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD. 153 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNIDO. 1972. Guidelines for project evaluation. United Nations, New York, NY. 383 pp.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Price, C. Project appraisal and planning for overdeveloped countries: I. The costing of nonrenewable resources. Environmental Management 8, 221–232 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01866964

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01866964

Key words

Navigation