Advertisement

Environmental Management

, Volume 6, Issue 3, pp 217–229 | Cite as

Urban waterfowl population: Ecological evaluation of management and planning

  • David M. Greer
Research

Abstract

An urban population of ducks in Puyallup, Washington, USA was studied for 14 consecutive months beginning in November 1978. Observations were made weekly from four study sites where ducks would congregate at early morning hours. Factors contributing to the presence of waterfowl in Puyallyup included abundant food supplies and a creek corridor that connected fragmented habitats in the urban area to the larger rural populations of waterfowl. Mallards (Anas platyrhynchos) were the most abundant of the 13 species observed and were the only ducks remaining during the nesting season. Habitat size and complexity were important factors influencing the species diversity of a particular site. Nesting success of mallards was poor due to limited distribution of nesting habitat, intraspecific aggression, and human disturbance. Both site-specific and more broad-based strategies are suggested for managing and planning for duck populations in urban areas.

Key words

Urban wildlife Waterfowl Ducks Wildlife habitat Island biogeography Ecological diversity Mallards Wigeons Puyallup Western Washington Urbanization 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature cited

  1. Barash, D. P. 1977. Sociobiology of rape and mallards, (Anasplatyrhynchos): Responses of the mated male.Science 197:788–789.Google Scholar
  2. Barnes, I. R. 1966. Amid brick and asphalt. Pages 414–424in A. Stefferud and A. Nelson, eds. Birds in our lives. USDI, Fish and Wildlife Service, USGPO. xiii + 561 pp.Google Scholar
  3. Bellrose, F. C., and J. P. Low. 1978. Advances in waterfowl management reseach.Wildl. Soc. Bull. 6:63–72Google Scholar
  4. Bishop, R. A., and R. Barratt. 1970. Use of artificial nest baskets by mallards.J. Wildl. Manage. 34:734–738Google Scholar
  5. Dagg, A. I. 1970. Wildlife in an urban area.Natural. Can. 97:201–212.Google Scholar
  6. Davey, S. P. 1967. The role of wildlife in an urban environment.Trans. N. Am. Wildl. Nat. Resourc. Conf. 32:50–60.Google Scholar
  7. Davis, A. M., and T. F. Glick. 1978. Urban escosytems and island biogeography.Env. Conserv. 5:299–303.Google Scholar
  8. DeGraaf, R. M. 1978. Avian communities and habitat association in cities and suburbs. Pages 7–24in C. M. Kirkpatrick, ed. Proceedings: Wildlife and people. Purdue Research Foundation, West Lafayette, IN. 191 pp.Google Scholar
  9. DeGraaf, R. M., and B. R. Payne. 1975. Economic values of nongame birds and some urban wildlife needs.Trans. N. Am. Wildl. Nat. Resourc. Conf. 40:281–287.Google Scholar
  10. DeGraaf, R. M., and J. W. Thomas. 1976. Wildlife habitat in or near human settlements. Pages 54–59in J. W. Andresen, ed. Trees and forests for human settlements. University of Toronto Press, ON, Canada. 417 pp.Google Scholar
  11. DeGraaf, R. M., and J. W. Thomas. 1974. A stategy for wildlife research in urban areas. Pages 53–56in J. H. Noyes and D. R. Progulske, eds. A symposium on wildlife in an urbanizing environment. Holdsworth Nat. Resources Cent., Univ. of Mass., Amherst, MA. Planning and Resource Devel. Ser. No. 28. 181 pp.Google Scholar
  12. Department of Conservation. 1964. Miscellaneous stream-flow measurements in the state of Washington—1890 to January 1961. Division of Water Resources, Olympia, WA. Water Supply Bull. No. 23. 292 pp.Google Scholar
  13. Duebbert, H. F. 1969. High nest density and hatching success of ducks on South Dakota cap land.Trans. N. Am. Nat. Resourc. Conf. 34:218–228.Google Scholar
  14. Duebbert, H. F., and J. T. Lokemoen. 1976. Duck nesting in fields of undisturbed grass-legume cover.J. Wildl. Manage. 40:39–49.Google Scholar
  15. Dwyer, T. J. 1970. Waterfowl breeding habitat in agricultural and nonagricultural land in Manitoba.J. Wildl. Manage. 34:130–136.Google Scholar
  16. Geis, A. D. 1980. Elements of an urban wildlife program. The Wildlifer. No. 180. 2 pp.Google Scholar
  17. Gill, D., and P. Bonnett. 1973., Nature in the urban landscape: A study of city ecosystems. York Press, Baltimore, MD. 209 pp.Google Scholar
  18. Gray, G. G., J. S. Larson, and D. A. Branhardt. 1979. Urban conservation leadership and the wildlife resource.Urban Ecology 4:1–10.Google Scholar
  19. Higgins, K. F. 1977. Duck nesting in intensively farmed areas of North Dakota.J. Wildl. Manage. 41:232–242.Google Scholar
  20. Hoover, R. L. 1976. Incorporating fish and wildlife values in land use planning.Trans. N. Am. Wildl. Nat. Resourc. Conf. 41:280–289.Google Scholar
  21. Jarvis, R. L., and S. W. Harris. 1971. Land use patterns and duck production at Malheur National Wildlife Refuge.J. Wildl. Manage. 35:767–773.Google Scholar
  22. Kirsch, L. M. 1969. Waterfowl production in relation to grazing.J. Wildl. Manage. 33:821–828.Google Scholar
  23. Kricher, J. C. 1972. Bird species diversity: The effect of species richness and equitability on the diversity index.Ecology 53:28–282.Google Scholar
  24. Leedy, D. L., R. M. Maestro, and T. M. Franklin. 1978. Planning for wildlife in cities and suburbs. Am. Soc. of Planning Officials, Chicago, IL, and U.S. Fish and Wildl. Serv., Washington, DC. FWX/OBS-77/66. 64 pp.Google Scholar
  25. Lucid, G. J. 1974. Bird utilization of habitat in residential areas. PH.D. Dissertation. Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State Univ., Blacksburg VA. 164 pp.Google Scholar
  26. MacArthur, R. H., and E. O. Wilson. 1967. The theory of island biogeography. Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, NJ. 203 pp.Google Scholar
  27. Martz, G. F. 1967. Effects of nesting cover removal on breeding puddle ducks.J. Wildl. Manage. 31:236–247.Google Scholar
  28. Meyer, P. A. 1979. Economic value and the lesser snow geese of Wrangell Island—A demonstration with respect to migratory birds. Paper presented at the Northwest Section of the Wildlife Society. Portland, OR.Google Scholar
  29. Mundinger, J. C. 1976. Waterfowl response to rest-rotation grazing.J. Wildl. Manage. 40:60–68.Google Scholar
  30. Oetting, R. B., and C. C. Dixon. 1975. Waterfowl nest densities and success at Oak Hammock Marsh, Manitoba.Wildl. Soc. Bull. 3:166–171.Google Scholar
  31. Phillips, E. A. 1959. Methods of vegetation study. Henry Holt and Company, Inc., NY. 107 pp.Google Scholar
  32. Scott, T. G., and C. H. Wasser. 1980. Checklist of North American plants for wildlife biologists. The Wildl. Soc. 58 pp.Google Scholar
  33. Shafer, E. L., and G. H. Moeller. 1974. Wildlife priorities and benefits: Now, 2000, and beyond.Trans. N. Am. Wildl. Resourc. Conf. 39:208–220.Google Scholar
  34. Shannon, C., and W. Weaver. 1963. A mathematical theory of communciation. Univ. Illinois Press, Chicago IL. 117 pp.Google Scholar
  35. Shoesmith, M. W., and W. H. Koonz. 1977. The maintenance of an urban deer herd in Winnepeg, Manitoba.Trans. N. Am Wildl. Nat. Resourc. Conf. 42:278–285.Google Scholar
  36. Shomom, J. J., B. L. Ashbaugh, and C. D. Tolman. 1974. Wildlife habitat improvement—guidelines on habitat management measures. National Audubon Society, NY. 96 pp.Google Scholar
  37. Simberloff, D. C., and L. G. Abele. 1976. Island biogeography theory and conservation practice.Science 191:285–286.Google Scholar
  38. Snedecor, G. W., and W. G. Cochran. 1967. Statistical methods, 6th ed. Iowa State Univ. Press, Ames, IA. 593 pp.Google Scholar
  39. Stearns, F. W. 1967. Wildlife habitat in urban and suburban environments.Trans. N. Am. Nat. Resourc. Conf. 32:61–69.Google Scholar
  40. Strange, T. D. 1967. Land use planning and zoning in conservation.Trans. N. Am. Nat. Resourc. Conf. 32:80–88.Google Scholar
  41. Thomas, J. W., and R. M. DeGraaf. 1973. Non-game wildlife research in megalopolis: The forest service program. USDA For. Serv. Gen. Techn. Rep. NE-4. 12 pp.Google Scholar
  42. Titman, R. D., and J. K. Lowther. 1975. The breeding behavior of a crowded population of mallards.Can. J. Zool. 53:1270–1283.Google Scholar
  43. Tubbs, C. R., and J. W. Blackwood. 1971. Ecological evaluation of land for planning purposes.Biol.Conserv. 3:169–172.Google Scholar
  44. Twiss, R. H. 1973. Planning for areas of significant environment and amenity value. Pages 233–248in D. M. McAllister, ed. Environment: A new focus for land-use planning. Nat. Sci. Found., Washington DC 328 pp.Google Scholar
  45. Twiss, R. H. 1967. Wildlife in the metropolitan landscape.Trans. N. Am. Natur. Resource. Conf. 32:69–74.Google Scholar
  46. Washington, T. 1978. Wildlife and the urban connection.Colorado Outdoors 27:38–42.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag New York Inc. 1982

Authors and Affiliations

  • David M. Greer
    • 1
  1. 1.Program in Environmental Science and Regional PlanningWashington State UniversityPullman

Personalised recommendations