When is overfishing underfishing?
The term “overfishing” is being used with increasing frequency to designate an undesirable level of fisheries exploitation. All too often, however, the term is taken as being self-evident. This article demonstrates that many definitions of overfishing are possible, depending essentially on what objective is being pursued for the fishery. Various possible biological and economic objectives are considered, both in a static and dynamic model of the fishery. Consideration is given to the best utilization of the fish stock from the viewpoint of the individual fishermen as well as that of society. It is shown that overfishing by one definition may be underfishing by another, and it is concluded therefore that anyone using the term overfishing ought, as a matter of course, to define it.
Key wordsOverfishing Fisheries management Maximum sustainable yield Maximum economic yield Optimum sustainable yield Dynamic economic yield Catch per unit effort
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Anderson, L. G. 1976. The relationship between firm and fishery (sic) in common property Fisheries.Land economics 52:179–191.Google Scholar
- Anderson, L. G. 1977. The economics of fisheries management. Johns Hopkins, London. 214 pp.Google Scholar
- Anderson, L. G. 1980. Necessary components of economic surplus in fisheries economics.Canadian Journal of Fish and Aquatic Sciences 37(5):858–870.Google Scholar
- Bevan, D. 1965. Methods of fishery regulation. Chapter 2in J. Crutchfield, ed. The fisheries: problems in resource management. University of Washington Press, Seattle, WA.Google Scholar
- Clark, C. W. 1976. Mathematical bioeconomics. Wiley Interscience, New York. 352 pp.Google Scholar
- Clark, C. W. 1977. Control theory in fisheries economics: frill or fundamental? Chapter 17in L. G. Anderson, ed. Economic impacts of extended fisheries jurisdiction. Ann Arbor, MI.Google Scholar
- Cunningham, S. 1980. EEC fisheries management: a critique of common fisheries policy objectives.Marine Policy 4:229–235.Google Scholar
- Cunningham, S., and D. Whitmarsh. 1980. Fishing effort and fisheries policy.Marine Policy 4:309–316Google Scholar
- Glantz, M. 1979. Science, politics and economics of the Peruvian anchoveta fishery.Marine Policy 3:201–210.Google Scholar
- Gordon, H. S. 1953. An economic approach to the optimum utilization of fisheries resources.Journal of the Fisheries Research Board of Canada 10:442–457.Google Scholar
- Gordon, H. S. 1954. Economic theory of a common property resource: the fishery.Journal of Political Economy 62:124–142.Google Scholar
- International Council for the Exploration of the Sea (ICES). 1977. Report of the ad-hoc meeting on the provision of advice on the biological basis for fisheries management. Co-operative research report no 62. 16 pp.Google Scholar
- Larkin, P. A. 1977. An epitaph for the concept of maximum sustained yield.Trans. Am. Fish. Soc. 106:1–11.Google Scholar
- Lockwood, S. 1978. Mackerel—a problem in fish stock assessment. MAFF Laboratory leaflet no. 44. 18 pp.Google Scholar
- Roedel, P., ed, 1975. Optimum sustainable yield as a concept in fisheries management. American Fisheries society special publication no 9. 89 pp.Google Scholar
- Schaefer, M. B. 1970. Man, birds and anchovies in the Peru current-dynamic interactions.Trans. Amer. Fish. Soc. 99:461–467.Google Scholar
- Skud, B. E. 1973. Management of the Pacific halibut fishery.Journal of the Fisheries Research Board of Canada 30:2393–2398.Google Scholar
- Tomkins, J., and J. Butlin. 1975. A theoretical and empirical approach to fisheries economics.J. Agri. Econ. 26:105–125.Google Scholar
- Whitmarsh, D. 1977. Technological change in the U.K. fishing industry. M.A. Thesis. University of Exeter, England. 292 pp.Google Scholar