Skip to main content
Log in

Air pollution control by economic incentives in the U.S.: Policy, problems, and progress

  • Profile
  • Published:
Environmental Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper deals with cost-effectiveness of the economic incentive policies of the bubble concept and offset credits relative to the policy of direct regulations of air emissions. The second section discusses single- and multi-plant bubbles, their adoption across regions and industries, the methods used to control emissions and the extent of savings in costs. We conclude that despite the delay resulting from duplication of review of state implementation plans by both the state and the Environmental Protection Agency, the required technological commands, the requirement to model air quality and the restrictions to permit bubbling only in the attainment areas, the policy is progressing successfully and should be encouraged by eliminating the restrictions. The third section analyzes the policy of emission offset credit, trading, and banking which can permit economic growth in nonattainment areas. It reviews the available literature, which deals only with aggregation of offsets across cities instead of individual offset trades. Progress by individual offset trades is analyzed in terms of the number of offsets, their acceptance across regions, the extent of reductions in emissions, and the classification of the offsets into internal and external trades. Comparison of estimated capital costs and prices of individual offsets with direct regulation costs reveals that the former are economical. We conclude that despite the problems of high tradeoff ratios, the short and uncertain life of the emission offset credits and the technological commands, the policy is progressing successfully and should be encouraged further by relaxing restrictions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature cited

  • Atkinson, S. E., and D. H. Lewis. 1974. A cost-effectiveness analysis of alternative air quality control strategies.Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 1:237–250.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bromberg, J. P. 1980. Bubbling new sources with existing sources: An examination of the environmental and economic benefits of an integrated approach to emission control. Paper submitted to Pennsylvania Electric Co., pp. I–48.

  • Butler, R. V. 1980. Improving environmental quality: Emission offsets and alternative policies. Paper presented at the Southern Economic Association meetings, Washington, DC., pp. 1–23.

  • Dames and Moore. 1980. An investigation of prevention of significant deterioration (PSD) of air quality and emission offset permitting processes. Report prepared for the National Commission on Air Quality, pp. 4–10.

  • Federal Register. 1980. Proposed rulemaking: Revision to the Rhode Island state implementation plan. 45(208):70513.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, A. M., III. 1980. Technology-based effluent standards: The U.S. case.Water Resources Research, 16(1):21–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garvey, D. B., and S. V. Moser. 1979. A study of the implementation of the 1976 emission-offset policy. Prepared for P. W. House, Director, Office of Technology Impacts, U.S. Department of Energy, Washington, DC. Table 2, pp. IV-6–7, prepared by Argonne National Laboratory.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hahn, R. W. 1980. Applying incentive-based methods to pollution problems: The case of paniculate sulfates in Los Angeles. Working paper for a study sponsored by California Air Resources Board at California Institute of Technology, pp. 1–26.

  • ICF, Inc. 1980. Preliminary evaluation of economics of NSPS offsets for utility powerplants. Draft report prepared for EPA's Office of Policy and Planning, pp. 1–14.

  • Lakhani, H. Workshop. mod. 1981. on clean air and economic growth. Conference oganized by Maryland Chamber of Commerce and Regional Planning Council of Baltimore SMSA, pp. 1–10.

  • Lakhani, H., and B. Burnham. 1980. Air emission fees in theory and practice. Concept Paper, National Commission on Air Quality, Washington, DC, pp. 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liroff, R. A. 1980. Air pollution offsets: Trading, selling and banking. Issue report prepared for the Conservation Foundation, Washington, DC, pp. 16–19.

  • Maloney, M. T., and B. Yandle. 1980. Cleaner air at lower cost.Regulation May/June:51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maryland Department of Economic and Community Development. 1981. Interim report to the Maryland General Assembly: Proposals for allocating air emissions. Annapolis, p. 36.

  • Mathtech, Inc. 1978. An analysis of alternative policies for attaining and maintaining a short-term NO2 standard. Report prepared for Council on Environmental Quality, p. 8–3.

  • National Commission on Air Quality. 1981. To breathe clean air. Report to Congress, Washington, DC, pp. 4.1–22.

  • Research Triangle Institute. 1974. Allocative and distributive effects of alternative air quality attainment policies. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, p. 8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seton, Johnson and Odell, Inc. 1980. Air quality and economic development: A growth management strategy for Portland, Oregon. Prepared for City of Portland, Bureau of Economic Development, pp. 1–159.

  • SRI, International. 1981. An estimate of the nonhealth benefits of meeting the secondary national ambient air quality standards. Report prepared for the National Commission on Air Quality, p. 5.

  • U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 1979. “Bubble” policy added to EPA's cleanup strategy.Environmental News Dec. 3:1–4.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 1980. The bubble clearinghouse. Washington, DC, p. 12.

  • U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 1981. EPA announces major changes in bubble policy.Environmental News Jan. 16:I-7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vivian, W., and W. Hall. 1979. An empirical examination of U.S. market trading in air pollution offsets. Draft report prepared for U.S. EPA by University of Michigan, Institute of Public Policy Studies, pp. I-1–I-15, II-1–II-4, III-1–III-30, IV-1–IV-29, V-1–V-5. Appendix Table 7A.1, pages for the Appendix are not numbered. Additional Table of cases as of July 25, 1980, pages not numbered.

  • Yandle, B. 1978. The emerging market in air pollution rights.Regulation July/Aug.:21–28.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This paper represents the author's personal views. Neither the Commission nor any member of its staff is in any way responsible for these views.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lakhani, H. Air pollution control by economic incentives in the U.S.: Policy, problems, and progress. Environmental Management 6, 9–20 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01866802

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01866802

Key words

Navigation