Advertisement

Environmental Management

, Volume 10, Issue 5, pp 637–650 | Cite as

A review of major factors influencing plant responses to recreation impacts

  • Fred R. Kuss
Profile

Abstract

This article reviews some of the more important factors found to influence the susceptibility of plants to trampling impacts associated with recreational use of natural areas. A three-way interaction mediates plant responses to impacts: plant x environment x stress level(s). Plant responses vary in part according to the genetic constitution of the plant, life and growth form, the adaptive flexibility of the plant, and anatomical differences inherent to growth habit and morphology. Other factors that influence plant sensitivities to impacts are the habitat environments in which plants grow, since a number of conditions such as moisture excesses or deficiencies, nitrogen or oxygen starvation, late frosts, etc., cause physiological injury and may increase plant sensitivity to impacts. Among the environmental factors that may increase or lessen plant sensitivities to impacts are soil moisture levels, canopy density, elevation, aspect, microclimate, soil drainage, texture, fertility and productivity. Seasonal influences also bear consideration since environmental changes and phonological and physiological events are mediated by time of year. Stresses are caused by both direct and indirect forms of impact and vary according to season of use, frequency and amount of use, and the type of activity. These interactions are further complicated by evidence that inter- and intraspecific competition, antagonism, and commensalism may influence differences in the sensitivity of plant communities to impacts.

Key words

Recreation impacts Plant stress Soil compaction Drainage Canopy densities Microclimate 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature cited

  1. Alexander, M. 1961. Soil microbiology. John Wiley and Sons, New York, 471 pp.Google Scholar
  2. Asphalt Institute. 1969. Soils manual no. 10 (MS-10). College Park, Maryland, 260 pp.Google Scholar
  3. Bates, G. H. 1935. Vegetation of footpaths, sidewalks, cart tracks and gateway.Journal of Ecology 23:470–487.Google Scholar
  4. Baver, L. D. 1933. Some soil factors affecting erosion.Agricultural Engineering 14:51–52.Google Scholar
  5. Blom, C. W. P. M. 1976. Effects of trampling and soil compaction on the occurrence of some plantago species in coastal sand dunes: part 1.Oecological Plant 11:225–241.Google Scholar
  6. Boyce, J. S. 1938. Forest pathology. McGraw-Hill, New York, 600 pp.Google Scholar
  7. Bryan, R. B. 1977. The influence of soil properties on degradation of mountain hiking trails at Grovelsjon.Geografiska Annaler 59:49–65.Google Scholar
  8. Burden, R. F., and P. F. Randerson. 1972. Quantitative studies of the effects of human trampling on vegetation as an aid to the management of semi-natural areas.Journal of Ecology 9:439–457.Google Scholar
  9. Cieslinski, T. J., and J. A. Wagar. 1970. Predicting the durability of forest recreation sites in northern Utah: preliminary results. USDA Forest Service Research Note INT-117. Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Ogden, Utah, 7 pp.Google Scholar
  10. Cole, D. N. 1979. Reducing the impact of hikers on vegetation: an application of analytical research methods. Pages 71–78in Proceedings: recreational impact on wildlands. USDA Forest Service Pacific Northwest Region, Seattle, Washington.Google Scholar
  11. Cole, D. N. 1981. Managing ecological impacts at wilderness campsites: an evaluation of techniques.Journal of Forestry 79:86–89.Google Scholar
  12. Cole, D. N. 1982. Wilderness campsite impacts: effect of amount of use. USDA Forest Service Research Paper INT-284. Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Odgen, Utah, 34 pp.Google Scholar
  13. Cole, D. N. 1984. Recreation use effects on habitat types in western Montana (in press).Google Scholar
  14. Cole, D. N., and B. Ranz. 1983. Temporary campsite closures in the Selway-Bitteroot wilderness.Journal of Forestry 81:729–732.Google Scholar
  15. Cole, D. N., and E.G. Schreiner. 1981. Impacts of back-country recreation: site management and rehabilitation: an annotated bibliography. USDA Forest Service General Technical Report INT-121. Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station.Google Scholar
  16. Crawford, A. K., and M. J. Liddle. 1977. The effects of trampling on neutral grassland.Biological Conservation 12:135–142.Google Scholar
  17. Daubenmire, R. F. 1974. Plants and environment. John Wiley and Sons, New York, 422 pp.Google Scholar
  18. Dawson, J. O., P. N. Hinz, and J. C. Gordon. 1974. Hiking trail impact on Iowa stream valley forest preserves.Iowa State Journal of Research 48:329–337.Google Scholar
  19. Dawson, J. O., D. W. Countryman, R. R. Fittin. 1978. Soil and vegetative patterns in northeastern Iowa campgrounds.Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 33:39–41.Google Scholar
  20. Del Moral, R. 1979. Predicting human impact on high elevation ecosystems. Pages 292–303in Proceedings: recreational impact on wildlands. USDA Forest Service Pacific Northwest Region, Seattle, Washington.Google Scholar
  21. Donard, G. B.; and C. W. Cook. 1970. Carbohydrate reserve content of mountain range plants following defoliation and regrowth.Journal of Range Management 23:15–19.Google Scholar
  22. Dykema, J. A. 1971. Ecological impact of camping upon the southern Sierra Nevada. PhD dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles, 156 pp.Google Scholar
  23. Frenkel, R. E. 1970. Ruderal vegetation along some California roadsides.University of California Public Geography 20:1–163.Google Scholar
  24. Frissell, S. S., Jr., and D. P. Duncan. 1965. Campsite preference and deterioration in the Quetico-Superior canoe country.Journal of Forestry 63:256–260.Google Scholar
  25. Goetz, C. 1975. Will we all participate in bac'k-country decisions?Appalachia 60(8):7–20.Google Scholar
  26. Hamilton, M. P. 1983. A floristic basis for the management of rare species and their communities in the San Jacinto Mountains, California. PhD dissertation, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, 189 pp.Google Scholar
  27. Hartley, E. A. 1976. Man's effects on the stability of apline and subalpine vegetation in Glacier National Park, Montana. PhD dissertation, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, 358 pp.Google Scholar
  28. Hecht, S. B. 1976. Ecological carrying capacity research, Yosemite National Park. II. Human impact on subalpine ecosystems: microclimate. US Department of Commerce, National Technical Center PB-270-956, 27 pp.Google Scholar
  29. Helgath, S. F. 1975. Trail deterioration in the Selway-Bitteroot wilderness. USDA Forest Service Research Note INT-193. Ogden, Utah, 15 pp.Google Scholar
  30. Holmes, D. O., and H. E. M. Dobson. 1976. Ecological carrying capacity research: Yosemite National Park. I. The effect of human trampling and urine on backcountry use and the ecological carrying capacity of wilderness. US Department of Commerce National Information Service, Springfield, Virginia, 247 pp.Google Scholar
  31. Huxley, T. 1970. Footpaths in the countryside. Countryside Commission, Scotland, 51 pp.Google Scholar
  32. Jones, D. H. 1978. The effect of pedestrian impact on selected soils. Master's thesis, University of Glasgow, Scotland, 154 pp.Google Scholar
  33. Kellomaki, S. 1973. Ground cover response to trampling in a spruce stand of myrtillus type.Silvia Fenn 7:96–113.Google Scholar
  34. Kellomaki, S., and V. L. Saastamoinen. 1975. Trampling tolerance of forest vegetation.Acta Forestalia Fennica 147:5–19.Google Scholar
  35. Kemper, W. D., B. A. Stewart, and K. L. Porter. 1971. Effects of compaction on soil nutrient status.In Barnes, Carleton, Taylor, Throckmorton, Vanderberg(eds.), Compaction of agricultural soils. ASEA, St. Joseph, Michigan.Google Scholar
  36. Knight, C. B. 1965. Basic components of ecology. MacMillan, New York.Google Scholar
  37. Krynine, Dimitri P. 1941. Soil mechanics. New York, 451 pp.Google Scholar
  38. Laing, C. C. 1961. A report on the effects of visitors on the natural landscape in the vicinity of Lake Solitude, Grand Teton National Park, Wyoming. USDI National Park Service. Unpublished report, 62 pp.Google Scholar
  39. Landals, M., and G. W. Scotter. 1974. An ecological assessment of the Summit area, Mount Revelstoke National Park. Unpublished report. Canadian Wildlife Service, Edmonton, Alberta, 197 pp.Google Scholar
  40. Leeson, B. F. 1969. Research on wildland recreation impact in the Canadian Rockies. Pages 64–65in Proceedings: recreational impact on wildlands. USDA Forest Service Pacific Northwest Region, Seattle, Washington.Google Scholar
  41. Legg, M. 1973. Site factors useful in predicting deterioration of forest campsites in northern Michigan. PhD dissertation. Michigan State University, East Lansing, 99 pp.Google Scholar
  42. Leney, F. M. 1974. The ecological effects of public pressure on picnic sites.Journal of Sports Turf Research Institute 50:47–51.Google Scholar
  43. Leonard, R., and H.J. Plumley. 1979. Pages 50–63in The use of soils information for dispersed recreation planning. USDA Forest Service Pacific Northwest Region R-6-001-1979, Seattle, Washington.Google Scholar
  44. Lesko, G. L. 1973. A preliminary site capability rating system for campground use in Alberta. Forest Research Center Information Report NOR-X-45, Edmonton, Alberta, 16 pp.Google Scholar
  45. Lesko, G. L., and E. B. Robson. 1975. Impact study and management recommendations for primitive campgrounds in the Sunshine-Egypt Lake area, Banff National Park. Forest Research Center Information Report NOR-X-132, Edmonton, Alberta, 86 pp.Google Scholar
  46. Liddle, M. J. 1975. A selective review of the ecological effects of human trampling on natural ecosystems.Biological Conservation 7:17–36.Google Scholar
  47. Liddle, M. J., and P. Greig-Smith. 1975. A survey of tracks and paths in a sand dune ecosystem.Journal of Applied Ecology 11:1057–1068.Google Scholar
  48. Liddle, M. J., and K. G. Moore. 1974. The microclimate of sand dune tracks: the relative contribution of vegetation removal and soil compression.Journal of Applied Ecology 11:1057–1068.Google Scholar
  49. Logan, L. L. 1979. Soil and vegetation patterns of campsites in northeast Iowa campgrounds. Master's thesis, Department of Forestry, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa.Google Scholar
  50. Lull, H. W. 1959. Soil compaction on forest and range lands. USDA Forest Service Miscellaneous Publication 768, 33 pp.Google Scholar
  51. Lutz, H. J. 1945. Soil conditions of picnic grounds in public forestparks. Journal of Forestry 43:121–127.Google Scholar
  52. Malin, L., and A. Z. Parker. 1976. National ecological carrying capacity research: Yosemite National Park. III. Subalpine soils and wilderness use. US Department of Commerce, National Technical Information Center PB-27-957, 89 pp.Google Scholar
  53. Manning, R. E. 1979. Impacts of recreation on riparian soil and vegetation.Water Resources Bulletin 15:30–43.Google Scholar
  54. Marshall, T. J., and J. W. Holmes. 1979. Soil physics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 345 pp.Google Scholar
  55. Mausbach, M. J., and E. E. Gamble. 1984. Bulk density summaries for midwestern soils.Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 39:203–205.Google Scholar
  56. McAtee, J. W., and D. L. Drawe. 1981. Human impact on beach and foredune microclimate.Environmental Management 5:121–134.Google Scholar
  57. Nagy, J. A. S., and G. W. Scotter. 1974. A quantitative assessment of the effects of human and horse trampling on natural areas. Waterton Lakes National Park, Canadian Wildlife Service, Edmonton, Alberta, 145 pp.Google Scholar
  58. Naito, T. 1969. Changes of alpine vegetation in Mt. Hakkoda due to human treading.Ecological Review 17:171–176.Google Scholar
  59. Orr, H. K. 1960. Soil porosity and bulk density on grazed and protected Kentucky bluegrass range in the Black Hills.Journal of Range Management 13:80–86.Google Scholar
  60. Palmer, R. 1972. Human foot impact. Pages 15–25in Wilderness impact study report, September. Sierra Club Outing Committee.Google Scholar
  61. Parish, D. H. 1971. Soil conditions as they affect plant establishment, root development, and yield. Pages 277–312in Barnes, Carleton, Taylor, Throckmorton, and Vandenberg (eds.), Compaction of agricultural soils. ASAE, St. Joseph, Michigan.Google Scholar
  62. Pearcy, R. W., and R. T. Ward. 1972. Phenology and growth of Rocky Mountain populations ofDeschampsia caespitosa.Ecology 53:1171–1178.Google Scholar
  63. Price, M. F. 1983. Management planning in the sunshine area of Canada's Banff National Park.Parks 7(4):6–10.Google Scholar
  64. Raunkaier, C. 1934. The life forms of plants and statistical plant geography. Oxford Press, London, 632 pp.Google Scholar
  65. Rees, J., and J. Tivy. 1978. Recreational impact on Scottish lockshore wetlands.Journal of Biogeography 5:93–108.Google Scholar
  66. Reid, W. H. 1979. Vegetative structure, physical environment and disturbance in White Sands National Monument, New Mexico. Proceedings: second conference on scientific research in the national parks 9:71–85. USDI National Park Service, San Francisco.Google Scholar
  67. Ripley, H. T. 1962. Recreation impact on southern Appalachian campgrounds and picnic sites. USDA Forest Service research paper SE-153. Southeast Forest Experiment Station, Asheville, North Carolina, 20 pp.Google Scholar
  68. Rutherford, G. K., and D. C. Scott. 1979. The impact of recreational land use on soil chemistry in a provincial park.Park News 15:22–25.Google Scholar
  69. Schreiner, E. S. 1974. Vegetation dynamics and human trampling in three subalpine communities of Olympic National Park. Master's thesis, University of Washington, Seattle, 130 pp.Google Scholar
  70. Schreiner, E. S. 1983. Personal communication. National Park Ecologist. Olympic National Park, Washington.Google Scholar
  71. Schreiner, E. S., and B. B. Moorhead. 1976. Human impact inventory and management in the Olympic National Park backcountry. Pages 203–212in Proceedings: recreational impact on wildlands. USDA Forest Service Pacific Northwest Region, Seattle, Washington.Google Scholar
  72. Scoles, F. G. 1977. Patterns of visitor use and seasonal changes in campsite condition associated with site design, soil texture, and vegetative cover type. Master's thesis, Ohio State University, Columbia, Ohio.Google Scholar
  73. Slatter, R. J. 1978. Ecological effects of trampling on sand dune vegetation.Journal of Biological Education 12:89–96.Google Scholar
  74. Sparrow, S. D., F. J. Wooding, and E. H. Whiting. 1978. Effects of off-road vehicle traffic on soils and vegetation in the Denali Highway region of Alaska.Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 33:20–27.Google Scholar
  75. Speight, M. C. D. 1973. Outdoor recreation and its ecological effects: a bibliography and review. Discussion Papers in Conservation 4. University College, London, 35 pp.Google Scholar
  76. Stohlgren, T. J. 1982. Vegetation and soil recovery of subalpine campsites in Sequoia National Park, California. Master's thesis, California State University, Fresno, California.Google Scholar
  77. Strand, S. 1972. An investigation of the relationship of packstock to some aspects of meadow ecology for seven meadows in Kings Canyon National Park. Master's thesis, California State University, San Jose.Google Scholar
  78. Thorud, D. B., and S. S. Frissel. 1969. Soil rejuvenation following artificial compaction in a Minnesota oak stand. Minnesota Forest Research Note 208, 4 pp.Google Scholar
  79. Thorud, D. B., and S. S. Frissel. 1976. Time changes in soil density following compaction under an oak forest. Minnesota Forest Reserach Note 257, 4 pp.Google Scholar
  80. Wagar, J. A. 1961. How to predict which vegetated areas will stand up best under active recreation.American Recreation Journal 1(7):20–21.Google Scholar
  81. Whisler, F. D., C. F. Engle, and N. M. Baughman. 1969. The effect of soil compaction on nitrogen transformations in the soil. West Virginia University Agricultural Experiment Station Bulletin 516T, 12 pp.Google Scholar
  82. Willard, B. E., and J. W. Marr. 1970. Effects of human activities on alpine tundra ecosystems in Rocky Mountain National Park, Colorado.Biological Conservation 2:257–265.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag New York Inc. 1986

Authors and Affiliations

  • Fred R. Kuss
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of RecreationUniversity of MarylandCollege ParkUSA

Personalised recommendations