The frequent charge that environmentalism is “elitist” is examined conceptually and empirically. First, the concept of elitism is analyzed by distinguishing between three types of accusations made against the environmental movement: (a)compositional elitism suggests that environmentalists are drawn from privileged socioeconomic strata, (b)ideological elitism suggests that environmental reforms are a subterfuge for distributing benefits to environmentalists and/or costs to others, and (c)impact elitism suggests that environmental reforms, whether intentionally or not, do in fact have regressive social impacts.
The evidence bearing on each of the three types of elitism is examined in some detail, and the following conclusions are drawn: Compositional elitism is an exaggeration, for although environmentalists are typically above average in socioeconomic status (as are most sociopolitical activists), few belong to the upper class. Ideological elitism may hold in some instances, but environmentalists have shown increasing sensitivity to equity concerns and there is little evidence of consistent pursuit of self-interest. Impact elitism is the most important issue, and also the most difficult to assess. It appears that there has been a general tendency for environmental reforms to have regressive impacts. However, it is increasingly recognized that problems such as workplace pollution and toxic waste contamination disproportionately affect the lower socioeconomic strata, and thus reforms aimed at such problems will likely have more progressive impacts.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Price includes VAT for USA
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
This is the net price. Taxes to be calculated in checkout.
Andrews, P. 1975. State trade group felt to be stepping on environmental toes.Seattle Times, 4 May:B1.
Barkely, K., and S. Weissman. 1970. The eco-establishment. Pages 15–24in Editors of Ramparts (eds.), Eco-catastrophe. Canfield Press, San Francisco.
Barnett, L. D. 1971. Zero Population Growth, Inc.Bioscience 21:759–765.
Barnett, L. D. 1974. Zero Population Growth, Inc.: a second study.Journal of Bio-Social Science 6:1–22.
Bartell, T., and A. St. George. 1974. A trend analysis of environmentalists' organizational commitment, tactic advocacy, and perceptions of government.Journal of Voluntary Action Research 3:41–46.
Binder, G. 1976. Clean air, water versus jobs: a muddy issue.Conservation Foundation Letter July:1–8.
Bullard, R. D. 1983. Solid waste sites and the black Houston community.Sociological Inquiry 53:273–288.
Burch, W. R., Jr. 1976. The Peregrine Falcon and the urban poor: some sociological interrelations. Pages 308–316in P. J. Richerson and J. McEvoy III (eds.), Human ecology: an environmental approach. Duxbury, North Scituate, Massachusetts.
Commoner, B. 1975. How poverty breeds population (and not the other way around).Ramparts 13:22–25 and 58–59.
Conservation Foundation. 1982. State of the environment, 1982. Conservation Foundation, Washington, DC.
Coombs, D. 1972. The Club looks at itself.Sierra Club Bulletin 57:35–39.
Cotgrove, S. 1982. Catastrophe or cornucopia: the environmentalists, politics and the future. Wiley, New York.
Devall, W. B. 1970. Conservation: an upper-middle class social movement: a replication.Journal of Leisure Research 2:123–126.
Dillman, D. A., and J. A. Christenson. 1972. The public value for pollution control. Pages 237–256in W. R. Burch and others (eds.), Social behavior, natural resources and the environment. Harper and Row, New York.
Dorfman, R. 1977. Benefits and costs of environmental programs.Society 14:63–66.
Dunlap, R. E., and M. P. Allen. 1976. Partisan differences on environmental issues: a congressional roll-call analysis.Western Political Quarterly 29:384–397.
Eckholm, E. P. 1977. The picture of health: environmental sources of disease. W. W. Norton, New York.
Faich, R. G., and R. P. Gale. 1971. The environmental movement: from recreation to politics.Pacific Sociological Review 14:270–287.
Fertig, R. D. 1977. The environment, the economy, and the excluded.Sierra Club Bulletin 62:47–48.
Frieden, B. J. 1979. The environmental protection hustle. MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Futrell, W. 1978. The inner-city frontier.Sierra Club Bulletin 63:5.
Grossman, R. and G. Daneker. 1979. Energy, jobs and the economy. Alyson, Boston.
Hardin, G. 1974. Lifeboat ethics: the case against helping the poor.Psychology Today 8:38ff.
Harry, J., R. Gale, and J. Hendee. 1969. Conservation: an upper-middle class social movement.Journal of Leisure Research 1:246–254.
Heffernan, P. 1975. Jobs and the environment.Sierra Club Bulletin 60:25–29.
Hornback, K. E., and D. E. Morrison. 1975. The role of public opinion in social movement evolution. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Sociological Association, San Francisco.
Jenkins, J. C. 1983. Resource mobilization theory and the study of social movements.Annual Review of Sociology 9:527–553.
Kazis, R., and R. L. Grossman. 1982. Fear at work: job blackmail, labor and the environment. Pilgrim Press, New York.
Kohl, D. H. 1975. The environmental movement: what might it be?Natural Resources Journal 15:327–351.
Krieger, M. 1970. Six propositions on the poor and pollution.Policy Sciences 1:311–324.
Kruvant, W. J. 1975. People, energy, and pollution. Pages 125–167in D. K. Newman and D. Day (eds.), The American energy consumer. Ballinger, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Levine, A. G. 1982. Love Canal: science, politics, and people. Lexington Books, Lexington, Massachusetts.
Mauss, A. L. 1975. Social problems as social movements. Lippincott, Philadelphia.
Milbrath, L. W., and M. L. Goel. 1977. Political participation, 2nd edn. Rand McNally, Chicago.
Miller, A. S. 1980. Toward an environmental/labor coalition.Environment 22:32–39.
Mitchell, R. C. 1979. Silent spring/solid majorities.Public Opinion 2:16–20, 55.
Mobil Corporation. 1979. Who's the public in “public interest” politics?New York Times, 1 November:A23.
Morrison, D. E. 1980. The soft, cutting edge of environmentalism: why and how the appropriate technology notion is changing the movement.Natural Resources Journal 20:275–298.
Morrison, D. E. 1984. How and why environmental consciousness has trickled down. Paper presented at a conference on Distributional Conflicts in Environmental-Resource Policy, Science Center, West Berlin.
Morrison, D. E., and R. E. Dunlap. 1986. Is environmentalism elitist?In F. H. Buttel and C. R. Humphrey (eds.), Environment and society. Pennsylvania State University Press, University Park, Pennsylvania (in press).
Morrison, D. E., and D. G. Lockwick. 1981. The social impacts of soft and hard energy systems: the Lovins' claims as a social science challenge.Annual Review of Energy 6:357–378.
Nelkin, D., and M. S. Brown. 1984. Workers at risk: voices from the workplace. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
Neuhaus, R. 1971. In defense of people: ecology and the seduction of radicalism. Macmillan, New York.
Peskin, H. M. 1978. Environmental policy and the distribution of costs and benefits. Pages 144–163in P. Portney (ed.), US environmental policy. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore.
Pinard, M. 1967. Poverty and political movements.Social Problems 15:250–263.
Pollack, S., and J. Grozuczak. 1984. Reagen, toxics and minorities. Urban Environment Conference, Washington, DC.
Project on Industrial Policy and Environment. 1984. America's economic future: environmentalists broaden the industrial policy debate. Natural Resources Defense Council, Washington, DC.
Schnaiberg, A. 1975. Social syntheses of the societal-environmental dialectic: the role of distributional impacts.Social Science Quarterly 56:5–20.
Sills, D. L. 1975. The environmental movement and its critics.Human Ecology 3:1–41.
Smith, C., and A. Freedman. 1972. Voluntary associations: perspectives on the literature. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Smith, J. N. 1974. Environmental quality and social justice in America. The Conservation Foundation, Washington, DC.
Taylor, R. A. 1984. Do environmentalists care about poor people?US News and World Report 96:51–52.
Tucker, W. 1977. Environmentalism and the leisure class.Harper's Magazine 255:49–56 and 73–80.
Tucker, W. 1982. Progress and privilege: America in the age of environmentalism. Anchor/Doubleday, New York.
Van Liere, K. D., and R. E. Dunlap. 1980. The social bases of environmental concern: a review of hypotheses, explanations, and enpirical evidence.Public Opinion Quarterly 44:181–197.
Zinger, C. L., R. Dalsemer, and H. Magargle. 1972. Environmental volunteers in America. National Center for Voluntary Action, Washington, DC.
This is Michigan Agricultural Experiment Station Journal article no. 11508.
About this article
Cite this article
Morrison, D.E., Dunlap, R.E. Environmentalism and elitism: a conceptual and empirical analysis. Environmental Management 10, 581–589 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01866762
- Environmental movement
- Environmental policy
- Public attitudes
- Social movements