Abstract
Initial decision analysis (IDA) is a microcomputer based decision-making technique that is organized so that a rational, step-by-step, procedure can be followed to use existing knowledge to develop resource policies. The IDA process provides a systematic way for participants to define their own problem and to explore jointly alternative solutions. IDA is particularly suited to resolving complex problems involving many groups with conflicting interests. IDA is illustrated with data from the US Forest Service's Draft Environmental Impact Statement for the 1985 to 2030 Resource Planning Act Program for the United States. Four policy options are evaluated: maximization of timber production, of grazing, and of wilderness, and a dominant use policy that concentrates timber management on productive sites. Policies were evaluated using a new mathematical satisficing procedure. Mathematical satisficing of simulated policy consequences showed that, for selected performance standards, current RPA policies are superior to the four alternative policies examined.
Similar content being viewed by others
Literature cited
Behan, R. W. 1974. Para-politics and resource management in the Corps of Engineers, or what to do while waiting for the Sierra Club to arrive. Paper presented to the US Army Corps of Engineers park managers seminar, Fresno, CA, 1 October 1974 (mimeo).
Bell, E. F. 1975. Problems with goal programming on a national forest planning unit. Pages 119–126in Proceedings, systems analysis and forest resource management. Society of American Foresters, University of Georgia, Atlanta, 11–13 August 1975.
Bonnicksen, T. M. 1978. A biosocial analysis of fire management decision-making for brushland watersheds in southern California. PhD dissertation. University of California, Berkeley. 268 pp.
Bonnicksen, T. M. 1981. Brushland fire-management policies: a cross-impact simulation of southern California.Environmental Management 5:521–529.
Bonnicksen, T. M., and R. H. Becker. 1983. Environmental impact studies: an interdisciplinary approach for assigning priorities.Environmental Management 7:109–117.
Bonnicksen, T. M., and R. G. Lee. 1982. Biosocial systems analysis: an approach for assessing the consequences of resource policies.Journal of Environmental Management 15:47–61.
Cortner, H. J., and D. L. Schweitzer. 1981. The political nature of quantitative models in local public forest planning. Pages 305–313in Proceedings, 17th IUFRO world congress, Kyoto, Japan, 6–12 September 1981.
De Neufville, R., and J. H. Stafford. 1971. Systems analysis for engineers and managers. McGraw-Hill, New York. 353 pp.
Hayes-Roth, F., D. A. Waterman, and D. B. Lenat (eds.). 1983. Building expert systems. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA. 444 pp.
La Porte, T. R. 1975. Organized social complexity. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ. 373 pp.
Lendaris, G. G. 1980. Structural modeling: a tutorial guide.IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics SMC-10:807–840.
Simon, H. A. 1955. A behavioral model of rational choice.Quarterly Journal of Economics 59:99–118.
US Forest Service. 1984. Draft environmental impact statement, 1985–2030 Resources Planning Act Program.
Yager, R. R. 1980. Competitiveness and compensation in decision making: a fuzzy set based interpretation.Computers and Operations Research 7:285–300.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bonnicksen, T.M. Initial decision analysis (IDA): a participatory approach for developing resource policies. Environmental Management 9, 379–391 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01866337
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01866337