Skip to main content
Log in

Geographic information systems and environmental impact assessment

  • Profile
  • Published:
Environmental Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The analytical structure of environmental impact assessment is continually changing as the applicability of established techniques from other fields and the development of novel methods become known. This paper illustrates the applicability of using existing data bases, through a geographic information system, for theex ante evaluation of land use disruption. More specifically, the Canada Geographic Information System was employed to retrieve, to analyze, and to produce land capability statistics and land use maps for the proposed Glengowan dam and reservoir.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature cited

  • CGIS (Canada Geographic Information System) 1976.Lands Directorate. Environment Canada, Ottawa.

  • CLI (Canada Land Inventory) 1969.Land Capability Classification for Outdoor Recreation. Report No. 6, Department of the Environment, Ottawa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffith, C. R. 1978. Social impact assessment: The proposed Glengowan dam and reservoir.Social impact assessment, No. 30, 4–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Switzer, W. 1976. The Canada Geographic Information System.Proceedings of Symposium on Geographic Information Processing, Carelton University, Ottawa. pp. 22–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tomlinson, R., H. Calkins, and D. Marble 1976.Computer Handling of Geographial Data. The Unesco Press, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Griffith, C. Geographic information systems and environmental impact assessment. Environmental Management 4, 21–25 (1980). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01866217

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01866217

Key words

Navigation