Journal of Behavioral Medicine

, Volume 17, Issue 4, pp 361–374 | Cite as

Psychosocial factors influencing low fruit and vegetable consumption

  • Robert G. Laforge
  • Geoffrey W. Greene
  • James O. Prochaska
Article

Abstract

A major national health campaign has recently been initiated to promote consumption of 5 or more servings of fruits and vegetables each day. This paper investigates psychosocial factors related to fruit and vegetable consumption to understand better who might be receptive and who might resist the national 5-A-Day campaign. We studied 405 adult respondents to a random-digit dial telephone survey. Applying the Transtheoretical Model, respondents were classified by stage of readiness to adopt the practice of eating 5 or more fruits and vegetables each day. Logistic regression models were developed for persons consuming 2 or fewer servings daily and for persons in the Precontemplation stage. Education was directly related to fruit and vegetable intake and indirectly related to being in the Precontemplation stage. Males were twice as likely as females to be in the Precontemplation stage and eat fewer than 2 servings a day. Of special interest, respondents with children at home were at greater risk of eating 2 or fewer servings a day than those without children at home (OR=1.63; 95% CI, 1.06–2.52). These results imply that stage of readiness to change should be considered as well as other factors in planning interventions for increasing fruit and vegetable consumption.

Key Words

fruit vegetables diet stages of change children 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Anderson, S. A. (1992).Guidelines for Use of Dietary Intake Data, Life Sciences Research Office, Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology; Bethesda, MD.Google Scholar
  2. Block, G., Patterson, B., and Subar, A. (1992). Fruit, vegetables, and cancer prevention: A review of the epidemiologic evidence.Nutr. Cancer 18: 1–29.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Bunch, K. L. (1990).1989 California Dietary Practices Survey, Focus on Fruits and Vegetables, Highlights, Nutrition and Cancer Prevention Program, California Department of Health Services, California Public Health Foundation. Nutrition and Cancer Prevention Program, Sacramento.Google Scholar
  4. Contento, I. R. (1992). Nutritional perspective on individual subject interventions. In Henderson, M. M., Bowen, D. J., and De Roos, K. K. (eds.),Promoting Dietary Change in Communities: Applying Existing Models of Dietary Change to Population Based Interventions, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA.Google Scholar
  5. Curry, S. J., Kristal, A. R., and Bowen, D. F. (1992). An application of the stage model of behavior change to dietary fat reduction.Health Educ. Res. 7: 97–105.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. DiClemente, C. C., Prochaska, J. O., Fairhurst, S., Velicer, W. F., Velasquez, M. M., and Rossi, J. S. (1991). The process of smoking cessation: An analysis of precontemplation, contemplation and preparation stages of change.J. Consult. Clin. Psychol. 59: 295–304.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Dixon, W. J., Brown, M. B., Engelman, L., and Jennrich, R. I. (1990).BMDP Statistical Software, Vols. 1 and 2, Berkeley, University of California Press.Google Scholar
  8. Ershoff, D. H., Mullen, P. D., and Quinn, V. P. (1989). A randomized trial of serialized self-help smoking cessation program for pregnant women in an HMO.Am J. Public Health 79(2): 182–187.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Greene, G., Rossi, S., Reville, A., Reed, G., and Blais, L. (1992).Evaluation of an Individualized Feedback System for Reduction of Dietary Fat Intake, Society for Nutritional Education, Washington, DC, July.Google Scholar
  10. Hosmer, D. W., and Lemeshow, S. (1989).Applied Logistic Regression, John Wiley & Sons, New York.Google Scholar
  11. Kristal, A. R., Abrams, B. F., Thornquist, M. D., and Disogra, L., et al. (1990). Development and validation of a food use checklist for evaluation of community nutrition interventions.Am. J. Public Health 80: 1318–1322.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. National Institutes of Health (1985).Health Implications of Obesity: Consensus Development Conference Statement, Bethesda, Feb. 11–13.Google Scholar
  13. Ockene, J., Kristeller, J. L., Goldberg, R., et al. (1992). Smoking cessation and severity of disease: The Coronary Artery Smoking Intervention Study.Health Psychol. 11: 119–126.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Patterson, B. H., Block, G., Rosenberger, W. F., Pee, and Kahle, L. L. (1990). Fruits and vegetables in the American diet: Data from the NHANES survey.Am. J. Public Health 80: 1443–1449.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Prochaska, J. O., and DiClemente, C. C. (1983). Stages and processes of self-change of smoking: Toward an integrative model of change.J. Consult. Clin. Psychol. 51: 390–395.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Prochaska, J. O., and DiClemente, C. C., (1986). Towards a comprehensive model of change. In Miller, W., and Heather, N. (eds.),Treating Addictive Behaviors, Plenum Press, New York, pp. 3–27.Google Scholar
  17. Prochaska, J. O., DiClemente, C. C., and Norrcross, J. C. (1992). In search of how people change: Applications to addictive behaviors,Am. Psychol. 47(9): 1102–1114.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Prochaska, J. O., DiClemente, C. C., Velicer, W. F., and Rossi, J. S. (1993). Standardized, individualized, interactive and personalized self-help programs for smoking cessation.Health Psychol. 12(5): 399–405.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Prochaska, J. O., Velicer, W. F., Rossi, J. S., Goldstein, M. G., Marcus, B. H., Rakowski, W., Fiore, C., Harlow, L. L., Redding, C. A., Rosenbloom, D., and Rossi, S. R. (1994). Stages of change and decisional balance for twelve problem behaviors.Health Psychol. 13(1): 39–46.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Rossi, J. S. (1992). Stages of change for 15 health risk behaviors in an HMO population. Paper presented at the 13th annual scientific sessions of the Society of Behavioral Medicine, New York, March.Google Scholar
  21. Salmon, C. T., and Nichols, J. S. (1983). The next-birthday method of respondent selection.Public Opin. Q. 47: 207–276.Google Scholar
  22. Subar, A. S., Heimendinger, J., Krebs-Smith, S. M., Patterson, B. H., Kessler, R., and Pivonka, E. (1990).5-A-Day for Better Health. A Baseline Study of American's Fruit and Vegetable Consumption, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Rockville, MD.Google Scholar
  23. U. S. Department of Health and Human Services (1991).Health People 2000: National Health Promotion and Disease Prevention Objectives, DHHS Publ. No. (PHS) 91-50212. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  24. Willett, W. (1990). Vitamin A and lung cancer.Nutr. Rev. 48: 201–211.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Ziegler, R. G. (1991). Vegetables, fruits, and carotenoids and the risk of cancer.Am. J. Clin. Nutr. Suppl. 53: 251S-259S.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • Robert G. Laforge
    • 1
  • Geoffrey W. Greene
    • 2
  • James O. Prochaska
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Psychology, Cancer Prevention Research CenterUniversity of Rhode IslandKingston
  2. 2.Department of Food Science and Nutrition, Cancer Prevention Research CenterUniversity of Rhode IslandKingston

Personalised recommendations