Abstract
We examined the construct validity of Potential for Hostility (PH) for healthy undergraduate males and females. In Study 1, 45 males and 76 females were rated for PH. Subjects then completed the Cook Medley Hostility Scale (Ho) and a trait negative affectivity (NA) scale. For males, PH correlated with Cynicism, a subscale of the Ho, but was unrelated to NA. However, for females, PH was unrelated to self-reported hostility and minimally related to NA. In Study 2, 52 males and 91 females again were rated for PH in addition to state NA; subjects also provided self-reported state NA and PH measures. For males, convergence was found between observed and self-reported PH scores, but no such relation was found for females; only self-reported and observed state NA predicted females' PH rating. Thus, the Structured Interview method of hostility assessment may not be measuring the same hostility construct in females as it is in males.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Barefoot, J. C. (1992). Developments in the measurement of hostility. In Friedman H. S. (ed.),Hostility Coping and Health, American Psychological Association, Washington, DC, pp. 13–31.
Barefoot, J. C., Dodge, K. A., Peterson, B. L., Dahlstrom, W. G., and Williams, R. B. Jr. (1989). The Cook-Medley Hostility Scale: Item content and ability to predict survival.Psychosom. Med. 51: 46–57.
Brody, L. R. (1985). Gender differences in emotional development: A review of theories and research.J. Personal. 53: 102–149.
Buss, A. H., and Plomin, R. (1984).Temperament: Early Developing Personality Traits. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.
Byrne, D. G., Rosenman, R. H., Schiller, E., and Chesney, M. A. (1985). Consistency and variation among instruments purporting to measure the Type A behavior pattern.Psychosom. Med. 46: 242–261.
Cates, D. S., Houston, B. K., Vavak, C. R., Crawford, M. H., and Uttley, M. (1993). Heritability of hostility-related emotions, attitudes, and behaviors.J. Behav. Med. 16: 237–256.
Chesney, M. A., Eagleston, J. R., and Rosenman, R. H. (1980). The Type A Structured Interview: A behavioral assessment in the rough.J. Behav. Assess. 2: 255–272.
Cook, W., and Medley, D. (1954). Proposed hostility and pharisaic-virtue scales for the MMPI.J. Appl. Psychol. 38: 414–418.
Costa, P. T., Jr., and McCrae, R. R. (1987). Neuroticism, somatic complaints, and disease: Is the bark worse than the bite?J. Personal. 55: 299–316.
Costa, P. T., Jr., Zonderman, A. B., McCrae, R. R., and Williams, R. B., Jr. (1986). Cynicism and paranoid alienation in the Cook and Medley Ho scale.Psychosom. Med. 48: 283–285.
Costa, P. T., Jr., McCrae, R. R. and Dembroski, T. M. (1989). Agreeableness versus antagonism: Explanation of a potential risk factor for CHD. In Siegman, A., and Dembroski, T. M. (eds.),In Search of Coronary-Prone Behavior, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp. 41–63.
Dembroski, T. M. (1978). Reliability and validity of methods used to assess coronary-prone behavior. In Dembroski, T. M., Weiss, S., Shields, J., Haynes, S. G., and Feinleib, M. (eds.),Coronary-Prone Behavior, Springer-Verlag, New York, pp. 95–106.
Dembroski, T. M., and Costa, P. T., Jr. (1987). Coronary-prone behavior: Components of the Type A pattern and hostility.J. Personal. 55: 211–235.
Dembroski, T. M., and MacDougall, J. M. (1983). Behavioral and psychophysiological perspectives on coronary-prone behavior. In Dembroski, T. M., Schmidt, T. M., and Blumchen, G. (eds.),Biobehavioral Bases of Coronary Heart Disease. Karger, New York, pp. 106–129.
Dembroski, T. M., and MacDougall, J. M. (1985). Beyond, global Type A: Relationships of paralinguistic attributes, hostility, and anger-in to coronary heart disease. In Field, T., McAbe, P., and Schneiderman, N. (eds.),Stress and Coping. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp. 223–242.
Dembroski, T. M., MacDougall, J. M., Williams, R. B., Haney, T. L., and Blumenthal, J. A. (1985). Components of Type A, hostility, and anger-in: Relationship to angiographic findings.Psychosom. Med. 219–233.
Dembroski, T. M., MacDougall, J. M., Costa, P. T., Jr., and Grandits, G. A. (1989). Components of hostility as predictors of sudden death and myocardial infarction in the Multiple Risk Factor Intervention Trial.Psychosom. Med. 51: 514–522.
Digman, J. M. (1990). Personality structure: Emergence of the five-factor model.Annu. Rev. Psychol. 41: 417–440.
Engebretson, T. O., and Matthews, K. A. (1992). Dimensions of hostility in men, women, and boys: Relationships to personality and cardiovascular responses to stress.Psychosom. Med. 54: 311–323.
Hearn, M. D., Murray, D. M., and Luepker, R. V. (1989). Hostility, coronary heart disease, and total mortality: A 33-year follow-up study of university students.J. Behav. Med. 12: 105–121.
Helmer, D. C., Ragland, D. R., and Syme, S. L. (1991). Hostility and coronary artery disease.Am. J. Epidemiol. 133: 112–122.
Leon, G. R., Finn, S. E., Murray, D., and Bailey, J. M. (1988). The inability to predict cardiovascular disease from hostility scores of MMPI, items related to Type A behavior.J. Consult. Clin. Psychol. 56: 597–600.
Maccoby, E. E., and Jacklin, C. N. (1974).The Psychology of Sex Differences, Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA.
Maccoby, E. E., and Jacklin, C. N. (1980). Sex differences in aggression: A rejoinder and reprise.Child Dev. 51: 964–980.
Matthews, K. A., Krantz, D. S., Dembroski, T. M., and MacDougall, J. M. (1982). The unique and common variance in the Structured Interview and the Jenkins Activity Survey measures of Type A behavior pattern.J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 42: 303–313.
Musante, L., MacDougall, J. M., Dembroski, T. M., and Costa, P. T. (1989). Potential for hostility and dimensions of anger.Health Psychol. 8: 343–354.
Rosenman, R. H. (1978). The interview method of assessment of the coronary-prone behavior pattern. In Dembroski, T. M., Weiss, S., Shields, J., Haynes, S. G., and Feinleib, M. (eds.),Coronary-Prone behavior, Springer-Verlag, New York, pp. 55–70.
Rosenman, R. H. (1991). Type A behavior pattern and coronary heart disease: The hostility factor?Stress Med. 7: 245–253.
Siegman, A. W. (1993). Cardiovascular consequences of expressing, experiencing and repressing anger.J. Behav. Med. 16: 539–569.
Smith, T. W. (1992). Hostility and health: Current status of a psychosomatic hypothesis.Health Psychol. 11: 139–150.
Smith, T. W., and Williams, P. G. (1992). Personality and health: Advantages and limitations of the five-factor model.J. Personal. 60: 395–423.
Spielberger, C. D., Johnson, E. H., Russell, S. F., Crane, R. J., Jacobs, G. A., and Worden, T. J. (1985). The experience and expression of anger: Construction and validation of an anger expression scale. In Chesney, M. A., and Rosenman, R. H. (eds.),Anger and Hostility in Cardiovascular and Behavioral Disorders, Hemisphere, New York, pp. 5–30.
Swan, G. E., Carmelli, D., and Rosenman, R. H. (1990). Cook and Medley Hostility and the Type A behavior pattern: Psychological correlates of two coronary-prone behaviors.J. Soc. Behav. Person. 5: 89–106.
Thomas, S. P. (1989). Gender differences in anger expression: Health implications.Res. Nurs. Health 12: 389–398.
Thoresen, C. E., and Low, K. G. (1991). Women and Type A behavior pattern: Review and commentary. In Strube, M. J. (ed.),Type A Behavior, Sage, Newbury Park, CA, pp. 117–133.
Watson, D., and Clark, L. A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales.J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 54: 1063–1070.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This research was supported by a grant to K. Davidson from the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada and the Heart and Stroke Foundation of New Brunswick.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Davidson, K., Hall, P. What does potential for hostility measure? Gender differences in the expression of hostility. J Behav Med 18, 233–247 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01857871
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01857871