De Economist

, Volume 138, Issue 3, pp 321–339 | Cite as

Coordinating unions, wages and employment

  • Jan Jacobs
  • Maarten Janssen
Article

Summary

In this paper we consider a two-sector economy in which individual unions are affiliated into a federation of unions. We analyze the consequences of two different types of wage setting. Firstly, individual unions set wages in their own sector without taking into account the effect of their wages on the employment level in the other sector. There may be positive as well as negative externalities. A positive (negative) externality may exist if a higher (lower) wage in one sector implies a higher level of employment in the other sector. Both cases may occur in our model. Secondly, wages in the two sectors are set by the federation of unions. We show that in this case higher (lower) wages result than in the first case if a positive (negative) externality exists.

Keywords

International Economic Public Finance Negative Externality Employment Level Individual Union 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abraham, F. (1987), ‘Bargaining Structures and Macroeconomic Performance in a Small Open European Economy with Imperfectly Competitive World Markets,’ University of Michigan, Discussion Paper no. 200.Google Scholar
  2. Calmfors, L. and J. Driffill (1988), ‘Bargaining Structure, Corporatism and Macroeconomic Performance,’ Economic Policy, 6, pp. 14–61.Google Scholar
  3. Cooper, R. (1988), ‘Will Share Contracts Increase Economic Welfare?,’ American Economic Review, 78, pp. 139–154.Google Scholar
  4. Cooper, R. and A. John (1988), ‘Coordinating Coordination Failures in Keynesian Models,’ Quarterly Journal of Economics, 103, pp. 441–463.Google Scholar
  5. Gylfason, T. and A. Lindbeck (1984a), ‘Competing Wage Claims, Cost Inflation, and Capacity Utilization,’ European Economic Review, 24, pp. 1–21.Google Scholar
  6. Gylfason, T. and A. Lindbeck (1984b), ‘Union Rivalry and Wages: An Oligopolistic Approach,’ Economica, 51, pp. 129–139.Google Scholar
  7. Hart, O. (1982), ‘A Model of Imperfect Competition with Keynesian Features,’ Quarterly Journal of Economics, 97, pp. 109–138.Google Scholar
  8. Kehoe, P.J. (1987), ‘Coordination of Fiscal Policy in a World Economy,’ Journal of Monetary Economics, 19, pp. 349–376.Google Scholar
  9. Keynes, J.M. (1936),The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money, London.Google Scholar
  10. Mulder, C.B. (1988), ‘Wage Moderating Effects of Corporatism. Decentralized versus centralized Wage Setting in a Union, Firm, Government Context,’ University of Tilburg, Discussion Paper, FEW no. 316.Google Scholar
  11. Mulder, C.B. (1989), ‘Efficient and Inefficient Institutional Arrangements between Governments and Trade Unions; an Explanation of High Unemployment, Corporatism and Union Bashing,’ Tilburg University, Discussion Paper, FEW no. 375.Google Scholar
  12. Nickell, S.J. and M. Andrews (1983), ‘Unions, Real Wages and Employment in Britain 1951–1979,’Oxford Economic Papers, Supplement, pp. 507–530.Google Scholar
  13. Oswald, A.J. (1979), ‘Wage Determination in an Open Economy with Many Trade Unions,’Oxford Economic Papers, pp. 369–385.Google Scholar
  14. Oswald, A.J. (1982), ‘The Economic Theory of Trade Unions: An Introductory Survey,’ Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 87, pp. 160–193.Google Scholar
  15. Varian, H. (1984),Microeconomic Analysis, New York.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1990

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jan Jacobs
  • Maarten Janssen
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of EconomicsUniversity of GroningenAV GroningenThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations