Skip to main content
Log in

Felodipine in the treatment of patients with severe hypertension and impaired renal function

  • Hypertension
  • Published:
Cardiovascular Drugs and Therapy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Twenty-three patients with severe hypertension and impaired renal function were included in an open study of the efficacy and tolerance of felodipine treatment over 6 months. All patients were previously treated with a diuretic, a beta blocker, and a vasodilator, and eight of them also received an ACE inhibitor. At the start of felodipine treatment the previously used vasodilator was withdawn. In nine patients the concomitant antihypertensive treatment was reduced during the study. The glomerular filtration rate (GFR), as51Cr EDTA clearance, was determined before and at the end of the study. The blood pressure (BP) and heart rate (HR) were recorded at all clinical visits in the moring 12 hours after the evening dose of felodipine and 2 hours after the morning dose. Plasma concentrations of felodipine were measured at every visit before the morning dose and 2 hours after dose.

The BP was reduced after felodipine was substituted for the previously used vasodilator. A significant additional antihypertensive effect was recorded 2 hours after the dose and amounted to −37±22/−15±12 mmHg (p=0.0001/p=0.0002) at 6 months. The effect measured 12 hours after the dose was less pronounced and was −11±28/−6±10 mmHg (p=0.15/p=0.03). Mean GFR was unchanged during the study, 38±19 versus 38±19 ml/min (n=16).

There was a sixfold interindividual variation in the trough plasma concentrations at steady state at the same drug dosage. Higher plasma concentrations seemed to be required to achieve the same antihypertensive effects as in patients with less severe hypertension and normal renal function. The frequency of adverse effects and the number of patients withdrawn (n=5) were somewhat higher than reported in patients with normal renal function and may be related to the high doses (up to 80 mg daily) used. In conclusion our data suggest that felodipine, in addition to other antihypertensives, is effective and is usually well tolerated in the treatment of patients with severe hypertension and reduced renal function. In order to ensure a more even reduction of BP over the day, a tid dosage regimen of the plain-tablet formulation used in this study may be preferable.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Folkow B. Physiological aspects of primary hypertension.Physiol Rev 1982;62:347–504.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Ljung B. Vascular selectivity of felodipine.Drugs 1985;29 (Suppl 2):46–58.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Edgar B, Bengtsson E, Elmfeldt D, et al Acute diuretic/natriuretic properties of felodipine in man.Drugs 1985;29 (Suppl 2):176–184.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Hulthén LU, Katzman PL. Renal effects of acute and longterm treatment with felodipine in essential hypertension.J. Hypertens 1988;6:231–237.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Herlitz H, Aurell M, Björck S, et al.. Renal effects of felodipine in hypertensive patients with reduced renal function.Drugs 1985;29 (Suppl 2):192–197.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Herlitz H, Nyberg G, Granerus G, et al. Effects of felodipine in patients with refractory hypertension and progressive renal disease.Scand J Urol Nephrol 1988; (Suppl 108):31–34.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Bröchner-Mortensen J. A simple method for determination of glomerular filtration rate.Scand J Clin Lab Invest 1972;30:271–274.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Bröchner-Mortensen J, Rödbro P. Selection of routine method for determination of glomerular filtration rate in adult patients.Scand J Clin Lab Invest 1976;36:35–43.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Ahnoff M, Ervik M, Johnsson L. Comparison of highselectivity gas chromatographic methods including column switching, for the determination of felodipine in plasma.Chromatography 1987;394:419–427.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Elmfeldt D, Edgar B. Relation between plasma concentration of felodipine and effect on diastolic blood pressure. 2nd Cardiovascular Pharmacotherapy International Symposium, San Francisco, USA 1987;232.

  11. Edgar B, Collste P, Haglund K, et al. Pharmacokinetics and haemodynamic effects of felodipine as monotherapy in hypertensive patients.Clin Invest Med 1987;10:388–394.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Shapiro, et al. The trough-to-peak ratio of felodipine, a novel approach to the evaluation of a tihypertensive efficacy throughout the dosing interval (abstract #1091).Am J Hypertens 1988;1:23A.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Hansson L, Dahlöf B, Gudbrandsson T, et al. Antihypertensive effect of felodipine or hydralazine when added to β-blocker therapy.J Cardiovasc Pharmacol 1988;12:94–101.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Andersson O, Hansson L, Sivertsson R, Primary hypertension refractory to triple drug treatment: A study in central and peripheral hemodynamics.Circulation 1978;58:615–622.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Edgar B, Regårdh CG, Johnsson G, et al. Felodipine kinetics in healthy men.Clin Pharmacol Ther 1985;38:205–211.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Edgar B, Regårdh CG, Attman PO, et al. Pharmacokinetics of felodipine in patients with impaired renal function.Br J Clin Pharmacol 1989;27:67–74.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Romero JC, Raij L, Granger JP, Ruilope LM, Rodicio JL. Multiple effects of calcium entry blockers on renal function in hypertension.Hypertension 1987;10:140–151.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Andersson OK, Granerus G, Hedner T. Felodipine, a calcium-inhibitory vasodilator in refractory hypertension.Drugs 1985;29 (Suppl 2):102–108.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Loutzenhiser RD, Epstein M, Hoston C. Inhibition by diltiazem of pressure-induced afferent vasoconstriction in the isolated perfused rat kidney.Am J Cardiol 1987;59:72A–75A.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Loutzenhiser RD, Epstein M. Renal hemodynamic effects of calcium antagonists.Am J Med 1987;82 (Suppl 3B):23–28.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Navar LG, Champion WJ, Thomas CE. Effects of calcium channel blockade on renal vascular resistance responses to changes in perfusion pressure and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition in dogs.Circ Res 1986;58:874–881.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Gustafsson D. Microvascular mechanism involved in calcium antagonist oedema formation.J Cardiovasc Pharmacol 1987;10 (Suppl 1):121–131.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Hedner T, Elmfeldt D, Dahlöf C, et al. Comparison of antihypertensive effect and pharmacokinetics of conventional and extended release felodipine tablets in patients with arterial hypertension.Drugs 1987;34 (Suppl 3):125–131.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Hart W, Westberg B. Felodipine extended release tablets once daily versus plain tablet twice daily in hypertension.J Cardiorasc Pharmacol 1988;12 (Suppl 6):s190.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Larsson, R., Lindsjö, M.K., Danielsson, B. et al. Felodipine in the treatment of patients with severe hypertension and impaired renal function. Cardiovasc Drug Ther 4, 253–259 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01857641

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01857641

Key Words

Navigation