Skip to main content
Log in

The costs of treating hypertension

  • Hypertension
  • Published:
Cardiovascular Drugs and Therapy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Recent surveys in the U.S. have reported, for the first time, that a significant number of patients with hypertension are finding that the cost of medication and treatment in general is an obstacle to treatment. The cost of management of hypertension can be contained if: a) the diagnostic workup is kept simple (this does not include the use of routine echocardiography or 24-hour monitoring) and b) medications that are relatively inexpensive and easily titratable on one or two visits are chosen. Despite some claims to the contrary, there are relatively few instances where significant metabolic changes are noted, regardless of the medication chosen, that require repeated blood determinations or frequent office visits.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Stason WB. Opportunities for improving the cost-effectiveness of antihypertensive treatment.Am J Med 1986;81 (Suppl 6C):45–49.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Kaplan N. Whom to treat: The dilemma of mild hypertension.Am Heart J 1981;101:867–870.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Moser, M. A decade of progress in the management of hypertension.Hypertension 1983;5:808–813.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Report of the Joint National Committee on Detection, Evaluation and Treatment of High Blood Pressure.JAMA 1977;237:255–261.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Report of the Joint National Committee on Detection, Evaluation and Treatment of High Blood Pressure.Arch Intern Med 1980;140:1280–1285.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Report of the Joint National Committee on Detection, Evaluation and Treatment of High Blood Pressure.Arch Intern Med 1984;144:1045–1057.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Report of the Joint National Committee on Detection, Evaluation and Treatment of High Blood Pressure.Arch Intern Med 1988;148:1023–1038.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hypertension Detection and Follow-Up Program Coopera-ative Group. Five-year findings of the Hypertension Detection and Follow-up Program: 1. Reduction in mortality of persons with high blood pressure, including mild hypertension.JAMA 1979;242:2562–2577.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kannel WB, McGee D, Gordon T. A general cardiovascular risk profile: The Framingham Study.Am J Cardiol 1976;38:46–51.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Moser M, Gifford R. Why less severe degrees of hypertension should be treated.J Hypertension 1985;3:437–447.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Perloff D, Sokolow M, Cowan R. The prognostic value of ambulatory blood pressure.JAMA 1983;249:2793–2798.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Moser M, et al. Long-term management of hypertension. Private practice experience.NY State J Med 1980;80:1102.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Zusman RM. Alternatives to traditional antihypertensive therapy [editorial].Hypertension 1986;8:837–842.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Moser M. In defense of traditional antihypertensive therapyHypertension 1988;12:324–326.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Shulman NB, Martinez B, Brogan D, Carr AA, Miles CG. Financial cost as an obstacle to hypertension therapy.Am J Public Health 1986;76:1105–1108.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Gallup G, Cotugno HE. Preferences and practices of Americans and their physicians in antihypertensive therapy.Am J Med 1986;81 (Suppl 6C):20–24.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Moser, M. The costs of treating hypertension. Cardiovasc Drug Ther 3, 743–747 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01857624

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01857624

Key Words

Navigation