Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The principle of consequences

  • Published:
Philosophical Studies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. Marcus Singer,Generalization In Ethics, (Atheneum: New York, 1971).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Norman C. Gillespie, ‘A Valid Deduction to the Generalization Argument’,Ethics 86, No. 1 (October 1975): 87. For a recent article that claims that Singer's deduction is invalid see R. Brockhaus and G. Hochberg, ‘The Generalization Argument Revisited’,Philosophical Studies 28, No. 2 (August 1975): 123–130.

    Google Scholar 

  3. David Lyons,Forms and Limits of Utilitarianism, (Oxford University Press: London, 1965), p. 23.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Judith Jarvis Thomson, ‘A Defense of Abortion’,Philosophy and Public Affairs 1, No. 1, (Fall 1971): 49.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Dept. of Philosophy, Buffalo State College, Buffalo, N.Y., USA

    Lansing Pollock

Authors
  1. Lansing Pollock
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pollock, L. The principle of consequences. Philos Stud 31, 385–390 (1977). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01857030

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01857030

Search

Navigation