Skip to main content
Log in

Laser pancreatectomy

A Comparison Between Dog and Pig

  • Original Papers
  • Published:
Research in Experimental Medicine

Summary

Total pancreatectomy was performed in dogs (n = 5) and pigs (n = 6) using a contact Nd:YAG laser with a wave length of 1060 nm. The fiber was connected to a laser scalpel, and a 1.0-mm-diameter sapphire tip was used. The power was set at 10–12 W with a pulse time of 9.9 s. The animals were followed postoperatively (p.o.) for 1 week, and no mortality, infection, or any other complication were observed. Total pancreatectomy was significantly faster to perform in pigs than in dogs (P < 0.001). The number of ligatures (P < 0.05) and the amount of bleeding (P < 0.05) were significantly less in pigs than in dogs. The present paper describes the anatomy of the pancreas in dogs and pigs, and also the technical procedure of total pancreatectomy in both species is presented. In conclusion, total pancreatectomy is easier to perform in pigs than in dogs. Furthermore, the anatomy of the pancreas in the pig resembles much that in man.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Berlatzky Y, Muggia-Sullam M, Munda R, Joffe SN (1987) Use of Nd: YAG laser in pancreatic resections with duodenal preservation in the dog. Lasers Surg Med 1985; 5:507–514

    Google Scholar 

  2. Eloy R, Bouchet F, Clendinnen G, Daniel J, Grenier JF (1980) New technique of total pancreatectomy without duodenectomy in the dog. Am J Surg 140:409–412

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Evans HE, Christensen GC (1979) Miller's anatomy of the dog, 2nd edn. Saunders, Philadelphia, Penn, pp 501–506

    Google Scholar 

  4. Getty R (1975) Porcine digestive system: Pancreas. In: Getty R (ed) Sisson and Grossman's the anatomy of the domestic animals. Saunders, Philadelphia, Penn, p 1279

    Google Scholar 

  5. Hoorn van WA, Vinik AI, Hoorn-Hickman R, Terblanche J (1978) The effect of feeding and starvation upon immunoreactive glucagon in the pancreatectomized pig. Endocrinology 102:653–656

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Joffe SN, Sankar MY (1987) Lasers in hepato-biliary and pancreatic surgery. In: Shapsay SM (ed) Endoscopic laser surgery handbook. Marcel Dekker Inc, New York, pp 281–300

    Google Scholar 

  7. Kiviluoto T (1985) Transplantation of pancreatic microfragments in totally pancreatectomized pigs. Eur Surg Res 17:119–127

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Kretschmer GJ, Sutherland DE, Matas AJ, Payne WD, Najarian JS (1978) Autotransplantation of pancreatic fragments to the portal vein and spleen of totally pancreatectomized dogs: A comparative evaluation. Ann Surg 187:79–86

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Schröder T (1982) The effect of early pancreatectomy and peritoneal lavage on the development of experimental haemorrhagic pancreatitis in pigs. Scand J Gastroenterol 17:167–171

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Schröder T, Brackett K, Joffe SN (1987) Proximal pancreatectomy: A comparison of electrocautery with the contact and non-contact Nd:YAG laser techniques in the dog. Am J Surg 154:493–498

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Schröder, T., Rämö, O.J. & Joffe, S.N. Laser pancreatectomy. Res. Exp. Med. 188, 227–233 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01852324

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01852324

Key words

Navigation