Skip to main content
Log in

Significance of thymus differential ratio in immunologic status of graft tolerance

  • Original Papers
  • Published:
Research in Experimental Medicine

Summary

LEW with BDE-heart graft received 0 (control), 15, or 40 mg cyclosporine (CsA)/kg b. wt. per day. On postoperative days 3, 5, 7, 10, and 14 in four animals each weight and cell count of thymus and spleen were determined, and thymus and spleen cell subpopulations were examined with monoclonal antibodies. The same tests were performed in FiS heart graft recipients without immunosuppression and ungrafted LEW which received 15 or 40 mg CsA. We expressed alterations in thymocyte subpopulations by using the differentiation ratio (DR), i.e., differentiated in % of all T-cells and by the ratio of helper to suppressor/cytotoxic T-cells (Th-Ts/c). In graft rejection the thymus showed no significant change in DR or Th-Ts/c. However, in the CsA-induced graft tolerance DR was elevated and at the same time Th-Ts/c declined, both showing maximum values on days 5 and 7 and a return to normal thereafter. FiS graft recipients exhibited similar thymus alterations as tolerant recipients, but less marked. In CsA-treated ungrafted LEW, elevation of DR was slight after 15 mg but very strong after 40 mg CsA (93% on day 7), and it did not return to normal in the latter group. Th-Ts/c was decreased in these ungrafted animals, but not as strongly as in tolerant graft recipients. Such thymus alterations were not observed in graft rejection. Spleen weights were strongly increased in graft rejection and unchanged in graft tolerance. Splenic Ts/c and Th-Ts/s were increased in CsA-treated tolerant recipients but not in graft rejection. We conclude that elevation of DR and decline of thymic Th-Ts/c in the initial postoperative phase are indicators of graft tolerance in organ recipients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Araujo JL, Williams JM, Heidecke CD, Christenson L, Towpik E, Kupiec-Weglinski JW, Tilney NL (1985) Cell cycle analysis and lymphocyte subsets in rejecting rat cardiac allografts. Transplant Proc 17:872–874

    Google Scholar 

  2. Baldwin WM III, Hendry WS, Birinyi LK Jr, Tilney NL (1979) Immune responses to organ allografts. I. Intense B-cell response to heart allografts in lymphoid tissues of unmodified rats. Lab Invest 40:695–702

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Baldwin WM III, Hendry WS, McLennan I, Tilney NL (1979) Immune responses to organ allografts. II. Decreased B-cell responses to cardiac allografts in rats pretreated with enhancing, suppressor cell, or T lymphocyte depletion protocols. Transplantation 28:228–234

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Baldwin WM III, Hutchinson IF, Meijer CJLM, Tilney NL (1981) Immune responses to organ allografts. III. Marked decrease in medullary thymocytes and splenic T-lymphocytes after cyclosporin A treatment. Transplantation 31:117–120

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Barclay AN (1981) The localization of populations of lymphocytes defined by monoclonal antibodies in rat lymphoid tissues. Immunology 42:593–600

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Bartchelor JR (1981) Immune mechanisms responsible for the prolonged kidney allograft survival in immunologic enhancement. Transplant Proc 13:562–565

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Brideau RJ, Carter PB, McMaster WR, Mason DW, Williams AF (1980) Two subsets of rat T-lymphocytes defined with monoclonal antibodies. Eur J Immunol 10:609–615

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Dallman MJ, Mason DW, Webb M (1982) The roles of host and donor cells in the rejection of skin allografts by T-cell deprived rats injected with syngeneic T cells. Eur J Immunol 12:511–518

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Demetris AJ, Nalesnik MA, Kunz HW, Gill TJ III, Shinozuka H (1984) Sequential analyses of the development of lymphoproliferative disorders in rats receiving cyclosporine. Transplantation 38:239–246

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Duncan WR, Stepkowski SM (1986) Role of T-cell subpopulations in the acceptance or rejection of allografts. Transplant Proc 18:202–206

    Google Scholar 

  11. Durkin HG, Carboni JM, Waksman BH (1978) Antigen-induced increase in migration of large cortical thymocytes (regulatory cells?) to the marginal zone and red pulp of the spleen. J Immunol 121:1075–1081

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Forbes RDC, Guttmann RD (1984) Pathogenetic studies of cardiac allograft rejection using inbred rat models. Immunol Rev 77:5–29

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Hall BM, Jelbart ME, Dorsch SE (1984) Suppressor T cells in rats with prolonged cardiac allograft survival after treatment with cyclosporine. Transplantation 37:595–600

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Höhnke C, Lee KS, Otani Y, Höfer M, Lie TS (1987) The graft's own regenerative potential suppresses rejection of hepatic transplants. Transplant Proc 19:1080–1081

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Kupiec-Weglinski JW, Filho MA, Strom TB, Tilney NL (1984) Sparing of suppressor cells: A critical action of cyclosporine. Transplantation 38:97–101

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Kupiec-Weglinski JW, Lear PA, Heidecke CD, Tilney NL (1984) Modification of function and migration patterns of thymocyte populations by cyclosporine after organ transplantation in rats. Transplantation 37:631–633

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Lee S, Willoughby WF, Smallwood CJ, Dawson A, Orloff MJ (1970) Heterotopic heart and lung transplantation in the rat. Am J Pathol 59:279–298

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Lie TS, Galkowska H, Jaeger K, Niehaus KJ (1983) Immunmechanismus nach Lebertransplantation. Experimentelle Studie bei Ratten. Langenbecks Arch Chir 360:17–27

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Lie TS, Yasuda K, Höfer M, Otani Y (1987) Thymus alteration in hepatic regeneration. Res Exp Med (Berl) 187:379–384

    Google Scholar 

  20. Lindor KD, Wiesner RH, Katzmann JA, Hamburger HA (1986) Selective activation of suppressor T-lymphocytes by cyclosporine in the antologons mixed lymphocyte reaction. Transplant Proc 18:893–894

    Google Scholar 

  21. Mason DW, Arthur RP, Dallman MJ, Green JR, Spickett GP, Thomas ML (1983) Functions of rat T-lymphocyte subsets isolated by means of monoclonal antibodies. Immunol Rev 74:57–82

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Morris PJ (1980) Suppression of rejection of organ allografts by alloantibody. Immunol Rev 49:93–125

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Nakajima Y, Kessler M, Nakano H, Lie TS (1985) Restoration of T-cell responsiveness to interleukin-2 in recipients of pancreatic islet xenografts treated with cyclosporine. Transplantation 40:73–76

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Paterson DJ, Green JR, Jefferies WA, Puklavec M, Williams AF (1987) The MRC OX-44 antigen marks a functionally relevant subset among rat thymocytes. J Exp Med 165:1–13

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Strom TB, Carpenter CB, Garovoy MR, Abbas AK, Corson JM, Bear RA, Soulillou JP (1975) Modification of the rat alloimmune response by enhancing antibodies and the role of blocking factors in the survival of renal grafts. Transplantation 20:368–380

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Stuart FP, McKearn TJ, Weiss A, Fitch FW (1980) Suppression of rat renal allograft rejection by antigen and antibody. Immunol Rev 49:127–165

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Tilney NL, Kupiec-Weglinski JW, Heidecke CD, Lear PA, Strom TB (1983) Mechanisms of rejection and prolongation of vascularized organ allografts. Immunol Rev 77:185–216

    Google Scholar 

  28. Van Buren CT (1986) Caclosporine: Progress, problems and perspectives. Surg Clin North Am 66:435–447

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Otani, Y., Höfer, M., Preißinger, H. et al. Significance of thymus differential ratio in immunologic status of graft tolerance. Res. Exp. Med. 188, 305–317 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01852279

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01852279

Key words

Navigation