Skip to main content
Log in

Role of fluid replacement, increased oxygen availability by perfluorochemicals and enhanced RES function in the treatment of mesenteric occlusion shock

  • Original Papers
  • Published:
Research in Experimental Medicine

Summary

Experiments were carried out on 183 rats to study the effect of a complex therapy for treatment of mesenteric shock. The superior mesenteric artery (SMA) was temporarily ligated for 90 min under ether anesthesia; this was followed by an analgesic treatment. After release of the ligated artery, fluid therapy was instituted by administering the equivalent of 7.5% of body weight of one of three different solutions: ringer lactate (RL), hydroxyethyl starch (HES) in RL, and perfluorochemicals (PFC, 4g/kg b.wt. in RL with HES), the latter with the aim to improve the oxygen transport to the tissue. The same fluid therapy was carried out on rats pretreated withE. coli endotoxin. Endotoxin pretreatment was chosen to compensate the negative effect of PFC on the reticuloendothelial system (RES) as shown in previous studies [15]. Survival time and survival rate were recorded as well as hematocrit values at different times before and after treatment.

Experimental groups were:Controls: (1) SMA occlusion without release; (2) 90-min occlusion without therapy.Treated animals: (3) RL therapy; (4) therapy with HES in RL; (5) therapy with PFC in RL and HES; (6), (7), and (8) identical therapies as Groups 3, 4, and 5, respectively, but with endotoxin pretreatment.

Survival time increased to the same extent if HES or PFC were added to RL. There was a further increase both in survival times and rates with endotoxin pretreatment (Groups 6, 7, and 8 vs. Groups 3, 4, and 5). The highest survival time and rate were obtained in Group 8, which received PFC therapy with endotoxin pretreatment. There was a slight negative correlation between survival time and hematocrit values if all groups were considered together. It was found that the most effective antishock treatment combines fluid therapy with a higher O2 content in the blood, achieved by the PFC emulsion, but that this combination was effective only under a pretreatment stimulating the RES. A further goal is to look for other mechanisms circumventing the need for the pretreatment part of therapy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Blattberg B, Levy MN (1962) Mechanism of action of reticuloendothelial system in shock. Am J Physiol 203:111–114

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Boettcher I, Gash J, Lohr H, Lindner P (1975) Bestimmung des intravasalen Volumenverlustes beim Arteria mesenterica superior-Schock der Ratte und Versuche zur adäquaten Substitutionstherapie. Langenbecks Arch Chir Suppl Chir Forum 191–195

  3. Bounous G (1967) Role of intestinal contents in the pathophysiology of acute intestinal ischemia. Am J Surg 114:368–375

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Cameron GR, Khanna SD (1959) Regeneration of the intestinal villi after extensive mucosal infarction. J Pathol Bacteriol 77:505–511

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Child CJ, Scott HJ, Gurd FN (1972) Volume deficit versus toxic absorption: A study of canine shock after mesenteric arterial occlusion. Ann Surg 175:479–488

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Fine J, Frank ED, Ravin HA, Rutenberg SH, Schweinburg FB (1959) The bacterial factor in traumatic shock. N Engl J Med 260:214–220

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Glotzer DJ, Villegas AH, Anekayama S, Shaw RS (1962) Healing of the intestine in experimental bowel infarction. Ann Surg 155:183–189

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Haglind E, Bengtsson JP, Falk A, Haglund U, Lundgren O, Schersten T (1986) Intestinal vascular obstruction in the cat. Right heart function in a shock model. Res Exp Med (Berl) 186:285–294

    Google Scholar 

  9. Haglund U (1973) The small intestine in hypotension and hemorrhage. Acta Physiol Scand [Suppl] 387:1–37

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hartley HO (1950) The maximum F — ratio as a short-cut test for heterogeneity of variance. Biometrika 37:308–312

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Juhasz M, Hamar J, Dezsi L, Feher E (1984) Effect of vascular perfusion on the regeneration of the small intenstine after prolonged ischemia. Kiserletes Orvostudomany (in Hungarian) 36:304–310

    Google Scholar 

  12. Lillehei RC (1957) The intestinal factor in irreversible shock. Surgery 42:1043–1054

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Lutz J (1983) Studies on RES function in rats and mice after different doses of fluosol. In: Bolin RB, Geyer RP, Nemo GJ (eds) Advances in blood substitute research. Liss, New York, pp 197–208

    Google Scholar 

  14. Lutz J, Barthel U, Metzenauer P (1982) Variation in toxicity ofEscherichia coli endotoxin after treatment with perfluorated blood substitutes in mice. Circ Shock 9:99–106

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Lutz J, Metzenauer P (1980) Effects of potential blood substitutes (perfluorochemicals) on rat liver and spleen. Pfluegers Arch 387:175–181

    Google Scholar 

  16. Marston A (1963) Causes of death in mesenteric arterial occlusion. I. Local and general effects of devascularisation of the bowel. Ann Surg 158:952–959

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Messmer K, Sunder-Plassmann L, Jesch F, Görnandt L, Sinagowitz E, Kessler M (1973) Oxygen supply to the tissues during limited normovolemic hemodilution. Res Exp Med (Berl) 159:152–166

    Google Scholar 

  18. Mitsuno T, Ohyanagi H, Naito R (1982) Clinical studies of a perfluorochemical whole blood substitute (Fluosol-DA) In: Frey R, Beisbarth H, Stosseck K (eds) Oxygen-carrying colloidal blood substitutes. Zuckschwerdt, München, pp 30–40

    Google Scholar 

  19. Okamoto H, Yamanouchi K, Tokoyama K (1975) Retention of perfluorochemicals in circulating blood and organs of animals after intravenous injection of their emulsions. Chem Pharm Bull (Tokyo) 23:1452–1457

    Google Scholar 

  20. Sachs H (1984) Angewandte Statistik. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York

    Google Scholar 

  21. Selkurt EE (1959) Intestinal ischemic shock and the protective role of the liver. Am J Physiol 197:281–285

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Shapiro PB, Bronsther B, Frank ED, Fine J (1958) Host resistance to hemorrhagic shock. XI. Role of deficient flow through the intestine in development of irreversibility. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med 97:372–376

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Tremper KK, Friedman AE, Levine EM, Lapin PR, Camarillo D (1982) The preoperative treatment of severely anemic patients with a perfluorochemical oxygen-transport fluid, Fluosol-DA. N Engl J Med 307:277–283

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Wagner R (1979) Ischämische Schädigung und postischämische Regeneration der Dünndarmschleimhaut. Thesis, Johannes Gutenberg Universität, Mainz

    Google Scholar 

  25. Wallenstein S, Zucker CL, Fleiss JL (1980) Some statistical methods useful in circulation research. Circ Res 47:1–9

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Zweifach BW, Grodon HA, Wagner M, Reyniers SA (1958) Irreversible hemorrhagic shock in germ-free rats. J Exp Med 107:437–440

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Partly supported by the Dept. of Health of Hungary, grant No. TPB-EüM-05 and by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, Lu 162/7.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hamar, J., Dezsi, L., Adam, E. et al. Role of fluid replacement, increased oxygen availability by perfluorochemicals and enhanced RES function in the treatment of mesenteric occlusion shock. Res. Exp. Med. 187, 451–459 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01852183

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01852183

Key words

Navigation