Advertisement

De Economist

, Volume 126, Issue 4, pp 521–549 | Cite as

Dutch treat

Long-run changes in personal income distribution
  • Joop Hartog
  • Jan G. Veenbergen
Article

Summary

This paper presents data on personal income distribution in the Netherlands for the period 1914–1972, in terms of decile income shares and measures of dispersion. Estimates are given of the trend and of cyclical sensitivity of income inequality, both trend and cycle being far more important before 1940 than after. Attempts to explain changes in inequality by regression analysis, with a necessarily limited set of variables, lead to many rejections.

Keywords

Regression Analysis International Economic Public Finance Income Inequality Income Distribution 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Beach, C. M., ‘Cyclical Sensitivity of Aggregate Income Inequality,’ Review of Economics and Statistics, LIX (1977), pp. 56–66.Google Scholar
  2. Cate, A. ten and W. J. Keller,Een efficiënte methode voor het vinden van een minimum van een functie van meerdere variabelen: een computer programma, Discussion Paper 7702/P, Institute for Fiscal Studies, Erasmus University, Rotterdam, 1977.Google Scholar
  3. Centraal Planbureau,De personele inkomensverdeling 1952–1967, Monografie 19, Den Haag, 1975.Google Scholar
  4. Champernowne, D. G., ‘A Comparison of Measures of Inequality of Income Distribution,’Economic Journal, LXXXIV (1974), pp. 787–816.Google Scholar
  5. Cline, W. R., ‘Distribution and Development. A Survey of Literature,’ Journal of Development Economics, 1 (1975), pp. 359–400.Google Scholar
  6. Douben, N. H.,Her herverdeelde inkomen, Deventer, 1970.Google Scholar
  7. Kooijman, M. A.,Dummy Variables in Econometrics, Tilburg, 1976.Google Scholar
  8. Mustert, G. M., ‘Meten met mate(n),’Economisch-Statistische Berichten, LXII (1977), pp. 331–33.Google Scholar
  9. Pen J. and J. Tinbergen, ‘Hoeveel bedraagt de inkomensegalisatie sinds 1938’?Economisch-Statistische Berichten, LXI (1976), pp, 880–84.Google Scholar
  10. Schultz, T. P., ‘Secular Equalization and Cyclical Behavior of Income Distribution,’Review of Economics and Statistics, L (1968), pp. 259–267.Google Scholar
  11. Tinbergen, J.,Income Distribution, Amsterdam, 1975.Google Scholar
  12. Williamson, J. G., ‘The Sources of American Inequality 1896–1948,’Review of Economics and Statistics, LVIII (1976), pp. 387–397.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1978

Authors and Affiliations

  • Joop Hartog
  • Jan G. Veenbergen
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of EconomicsErasmus UniversityRotterdamThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations